Search results

activities of the controller or the processor at issue in the GDPR infringement(s). Second, it needs to be considered whether specific data processing infringing

The Court did not question the Police’s argument that, with regard to archived criminal investigations, they don't have information about the actual identities

the scope and validity of the consent given by consumers to the processing(s). The Inspection Service and the Litigation Chamber of the Belgian DPA held

The audio on the file contains two voices and provides: “Who’s this? Who’s that? …. it’s Arkadiusz, one of our supervisors.” 114.6 Accordingly, during

data subject's consent on repeated occasions. Firth, the DPA stated that the controller was responsible for uploading the data subject's CV to Facebook

Google Group, and constitutes the group's European headquarters, it is the board's assessment that Google Denmark ApS can also be considered to be an establishment

complainant's company first and then the complainant personally, "indicating that the action was intentional". The DPA commented that they don't believe

BANKINTER.S. A 02/11/2022 Amp. Term to BANKINTER, S.A. 02/14/2022 Request for a copy of the BANKINTER.S file. A 02/14/2022 Transfer to BANKINTER, S.A. 02/25/2022

front camera to register the data subject's face while taking the exam, but it also captured the computer’s desktop. An additional camera had ot be installed

agreed to initiate sanction proceedings against HOSPITAL RECOLETAS PONFERRADA, S.L. (hereinafter the claimed party). Notified on initiation agreement and after

the proposed legal basis . You definitely want to help, but you by sending don’t want to break the law . On the basis of the information you have provided

Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (FOMR) reassessed the data subject's refugee status. In a request for information with a deadline subject to a €500

'scientific research purposes' (Article 9(2)(j) GDPR). Thomas International Systems, S.A ('Thomas'), the controller, was a talent acquisition company that carried

distinction between the subscribers who want to appear in a directory and those who don't, is in practice expressed by assigning a code in the registration of each

within the meaning of 50 U.S. code § 1881a (b) (49) and as such is subject to supervision by U.S. Intelligence agencies under 50 U.S. Code § 1881a ("FISA 702"):

Spanish Agency for Data Protection. The claim is directs against MALAGATROM, S.L.U. with NIF B93178614 (hereinafter, MALAGATROM or the claimed one), which

prepared brief - Unmistakable relevant information from the 1st BF (minutes S 5 and 6). It is precisely from this that the MB, whose only access route through

was sponsored by the first complainant's company. It is therefore one clear predominance of the first complainant's interests in freedom of expression of

ES5500493569920005001274, indicating in the beneficiary the T.S.J. Contentious-Administrative Chamber Section 4 NIF: S-2813600J, and in the observations section 18 JURISPRUDENCE

compensation. This decision was made by mr. T. Boesman, judge, in the presence of mr. S.M.J. Boss, clerk. The verdict was pronounced in public on March 29, 2022. clerk