Search results

territory of its Member State in accordance with Article 55(1). In that case, the urgent need to act under Article 66(1) shall be presumed to be met and require

GDPR (Article 31 GDPR). Direct liability of the representative is limited to the obligations set out in Article 30 and Article 58(1)(a) GDPR. Article 27(5)

of this Article, the other supervisory authorities may adopt a provisional measure on the territory of its Member State in accordance with Article 55. In

studies. Hence, Article 89(2) and (3) GDPR also allow for specific derogation to the GDPR for these purposes, as further detailed below. Article 89(1) GDPR

explicit wording of Article 81 GDPR does not limit its application to proceedings instigated either under Article 78 GDPR or Article 79 GDPR. Secondly,

by Article 53(4) GDPR are contained in several other EU law provisions concerning the dismissal of members of independent bodies. These are Article 247

commentary to Article 60 GDPR, Article 61 GDPR, Article 62 GDPR, Article 63 GDPR, Article 64 GDPR, Article 65 GDPR, Article 66 GDPR and Article 56 GDPR. The

subject – may violate primary EU law, namely Article 47 CFR in connection with Article 16 TFEU and Article 8 CFR. In Joined Cases E-11/19 and E-12/1, the

required in principle (see hereunder Article 65(2) GDPR) to adopt a decision under Article 65 GDPR is reached, since Article 64 GDPR only requires a simple majority

processing), Article 57 GDPR (tasks of SAs), Article 58 GDPR (powers of SAs), as well as Article 65 GDPR (dispute resolution by the board), Article 63 GDPR (consistency

consent pursuant to point (a) of Article 6(1) or point (a) of Article 9(2) or on a contract pursuant to point (b) of Article 6(1); and (b) the processing is

complaint with all due diligence (see, by analogy, as regards Article 25(6) of Directive 95/46, judgment of 6 October 2015, Schrems, C‑362/14, EU:C:2015:650

the functioning of decisions adopted on the basis of Article 25(6) or Article 26(4) of Directive 95/46/EC. In its adequacy decisions, the Commission should

basis of both the Directive 95/46/EC and the GDPR. The Court assessed the requirements for a valid consent under both Directive 95/46/EC and the GDPR and

violation of rights under Directive 95/46 was claimed, but rather a violation of the basic provision of Article 25 of Directive 95/46. 51 From a Union law perspective

controller in Article 82 of French Data Protection Act, which is justified by the reference made by Article 2 of the ePrivacy Directive to Directive 95/46/EC on

other countries, although it contemplated several exceptions. Following Directive 95/46/EC, the Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos de Carácter Personal (Organic

scope of the Data Protection Directive 95/46 under the exceptions stipulated in Article 3(2) of the Data Protection Directive 95/46? (2) Whether personal data

artistic or literary purposes, only Article 24, Article 26, Article 28, Article 29, Article 32, and Article 40- Article 43 applies, following § 3. Special

took effect in the European Union (EU) on May 25, 2018, it replaced both the Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC) and the Dutch Personal Data Protection Act