Search results

as: [defendant] , authorized representatives: mr. O.A. Sleeking and mr. A.W.D. lensink. 1. The process 1.1. The course of the procedure follows from the

statement was made by mr. L.M. Reijnierse, judge, in the presence of mr. E.H.W. Schierbeek, clerk. The decision was pronounced on November 10, 2020 and will

November 26, 2020, GZ 3 R 128 / 20v-15 , with which the judgment of the Salzburg Regional Court of August 14, 2020, GZ 4 Cg 67 / 19w-9, was partially amended

refers to the judgment of the Federal Fiscal Court of October 28, 2009 (VIII R 78/05) and the ruling of the Bavarian State Office for Taxes of March 28, 2020

telephone (video) connection. The agents of defendants J. Stoffels (Roerdalen), R. Timmers (Valkenburg aan de Geul), M. Orasanin (Vaals) and Mr. A.A.C.M. Gidding-Baade

Bodewits), and the Dutch Data Protection Authority, defendant (attorneys: mr. W. van Steenbergen and mr. E Nijhof). Procedure By decision of 23 September 2019

operates in Belgium, and the complainant has been a senior executive of Company W for some time. years, i.e. a company that is closely related to Company Z.

business number W245 2252208-1/36E W245 2252221-1/30E Written copy of the verbal decision announced on March 31, 2023 I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K 

of 26 January 2006, p. 1). July 2017 - RiZ (R) 3/16 -, juris marginal no. 15 and of 16 March 2005 - RiZ (R) 2/04 -, juris marginal no. 20; VG Potsdam,

represented by his counsel Mr. Dr. Jan-Henning Strunz, Matray, Matray & Hallet, s.c.r.l, rue des Fories, 2, 4020 Liège, hereinafter “the plaintiff” The defendant:

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 9 . 0 4 . 2 0 2 2 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 5 8 2 2 4 7 0 2 8 - 1 / 1 1 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court

case of monocratic jurisdiction, there is administration (Muzak, B-VG6 Art 87 R 2 f). According to Article 87, paragraph 2, B-VG, a judge is “in the exercise

detailed presentation can be dispensed with in this respect. 2.2.3 Regarding W 258 2216873, the Federal Administrative Court (BVwG) in its decision of 30

AUGUST 2021 [doc. web n. 9685994] Order injunction against Deliveroo Italy s.r.l. - July 22, 2021 Record of measures n. 285 of 22 July 2021 THE GUARANTOR

random=1672750512146 &cv=11&fst=1672747200000&bg=fffff&guid=ON&async=1&gtm=2oabu0&u_w=1920 &u_h=1080&frm=0&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.telekom.de%2Fstart &tiba=Teleko

this case was the complaint of the Bank [...] Spółka Akcyjna with its seat in W. against the decision of the President of the Personal Data Protection Office

person with NIPC 506204367 and headquarters at Rua de Sao Tomee Principe, 18 r/c Oto. , 2900-087 Setubal, dedicates itself to support for immigrants from

breach by TUiR WARTA SA with its seat in W., President of the Personal Data Protection Office,finding that TUiR WARTA SA with its seat in W. has breached

plaintiff (...) with its seat in W. purchased the debt from (...) Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością S.K.A. with its seat in W. Party to the loan agreement

original for more details. 1/7  File No.: TD / 00044/2021 RESOLUTION NO: R / 00423/2021 Considering the claim made before this Agency by A.A.A. (hereinafter