BVwG - W258 2217446-1

From GDPRhub
Revision as of 13:43, 4 December 2020 by MB (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{COURTdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Austria |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo=Courts_logo1.png |Court_Abbrevation=BVwG |Court_With_Country=BVwG (Austria) |Case_Number_Name=W258 22174...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
BVwG - W258 2217446-1
Courts logo1.png
Court: BVwG (Austria)
Jurisdiction: Austria
Relevant Law: Article 4(1) GDPR
Article 5(1) GDPR
Article 9(1) GDPR
Article 9(2) GDPR
Article 16 GDPR
Article 17(3) GDPR
Article 58(2)(d) GDPR
Article 133(4) Federal Constitution (Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz - B-VG)
§ 151 Trade Regulation Act (Gewerbeordnung 1994 - GewO)
Decided: 26.11.2020
Published: 02.12.2020
Parties: Austrian Postal Service (Plaintiff)
Austrian Data Protection Authority (DSB; Respondent)
National Case Number/Name: W258 2217446-1
European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:AT:BVWG:2020:W258.2217446.1.01
Appeal from: DSB
DSB-D213.747/0002-DSB/2019 (not published because parts of the case are pending before Austrian Administrative Supreme Court (VwGH))
Appeal to: Unknown
Original Language(s): German
Original Source: Rechtsinformationssystem des Bundes (RIS) (in German)
Initial Contributor: Marco Blocher

The Austrian Federal Administrative Court partially uphelds a decision of the Austrian DPA: Data on the presumed "affinity for a political party" are special categories of personal data. Their processing would require the data subject's consent.

English Summary

Facts

TBC

Dispute

TBC

Holding

TBC

Comment

Share your comments here!

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!

English Machine Translation of the Decision

The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details.