Rb. Amsterdam - C/13/696010 / HA ZA 21-81
From GDPRhub
Rb. Amsterdam - C/13/696010 / HA ZA 21-81 | |
---|---|
Court: | Rb. Amsterdam (Netherlands) |
Jurisdiction: | Netherlands |
Relevant Law: | Article 22 GDPR |
Decided: | 24.02.2021 |
Published: | 14.04.2021 |
Parties: | Uber B.V. |
National Case Number/Name: | C/13/696010 / HA ZA 21-81 |
European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2021:1415 |
Appeal from: | |
Appeal to: | |
Original Language(s): | Dutch |
Original Source: | de Rechtspraak (in Dutch) |
Initial Contributor: | n/a |
In progress.
English Summary
Facts
In progress.
Dispute
In progress.
Holding
In progress.
Comment
In progress.
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
English Machine Translation of the Decision
The decision below is a machine translation of the Dutch original. Please refer to the Dutch original for more details.
Authority Court of Amsterdam Date of judgment 24-02-2021 Date of publication 14-04-2021 Case number C / 13/696010 / HA ZA 21-81 Jurisdictions Civil rights Special characteristics First instance - single Miter Content indication Judgment in absentia. Locations Rechtspraak.nl Enriched pronunciation Share pronunciation Print Save as PDF Copy link Statement verdict COURT OF AMSTERDAM Private Law Department case number / cause list number: C / 13/696010 / HA ZA 21-81 Judgment of February 24, 2021 in the case of 1 [claimant 1], residing in [residence 1] (United Kingdom), 2. [claimant 2], residing in [residence 1] (United Kingdom), 3. [claimant 3], residing in [residence 1] (United Kingdom), 4. [claimant 4], residing in [residence 1] (United Kingdom), 5. [claimant 5], residing in [residence 2], 6. [claimant 6], residing in [residence 3] (United Kingdom), plaintiffs, lawyer mr. A.H. Ekker in Amsterdam, against the private company with limited liability UBER B.V., Based in Amsterdam, defendant, not published. 1 The procedure 1.1. The course of the procedure is evidenced by: - the summons, with exhibits, - the default granted against the defendant. 1.2. Finally, verdict has been determined. 2 The assessment 2.1. The claimed penalty will be limited as follows. 2.2. The claim does not otherwise appear to the court to be unlawful or unfounded and will be awarded as follows. 2.3. As the unsuccessful party, the defendant will be ordered to pay the costs of the proceedings. The costs on the part of the claimants are estimated at: - summons € 100.89 - court fee 1,666.00 - lawyer salary 1,770.00 (1.0 point × rate € 1,770.00) Total € 3,536.89 3 The decision The court 3.1. reserves the right that the defendant's decisions regarding the alleged violation of defendant's terms and conditions and / or the alleged fraudulent acts of plaintiffs and / or the termination of the agreement between defendant and plaintiffs and / or deactivation of Uber Driver accounts of claimants can be regarded as decisions based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which have legal consequences for claimants or which otherwise significantly affect them, within the meaning of Article 22 (1) GDPR, 3.2. destroys defendant's automated decisions regarding the alleged violation of defendant's terms and conditions and / or plaintiffs' alleged fraudulent acts and / or termination of defendant's / plaintiffs' agreement and / or deactivation of plaintiffs' Uber Driver accounts, 3.3. orders defendant to undo the deactivation of claimants' Uber Driver account within one week of serving this judgment, 3.4. orders the defendant to pay the plaintiffs a penalty of € 5,000.00 for each day or part thereof that they fail to comply with in 3.3. pronounced main conviction, up to a maximum of € 50,000.00 has been reached, 3.5. orders the defendant to pay an amount of € 19,012.00 (nineteen thousand and twelve euros) to the plaintiff under 1 within fourteen days after this judgment has been served, plus the statutory interest as referred to in art. 6: 119 BW on this amount from December 30, 2020 until the day of full payment, 3.6. orders the defendant to pay an amount of € 15,968.00 (fifteen thousand nine hundred and sixty-eight euros) to the plaintiff sub 2 within fourteen days after this judgment has been served, plus the statutory interest as referred to in art. 6: 119 BW on this amount from December 30, 2020 until the day of full payment, 3.7. orders the defendant to pay an amount of € 16,012.00 (sixteen thousand and twelve euros) to the plaintiff sub 3 within fourteen days after this judgment has been served, plus the statutory interest as referred to in art. 6: 119 BW on this amount from December 30, 2020 until the day of full payment, 3.8. orders the defendant to pay an amount of € 19,518.00 (nineteen thousand five hundred eighteen euros) to the plaintiff sub 4 within fourteen days after this judgment has been served, plus the statutory interest as referred to in art. 6: 119 BW on this amount from December 30, 2020 until the day of full payment, 3.9. orders the defendant to pay an amount of € 8,206.00 (eight thousand two hundred and six euros) to the plaintiff sub 5 within fourteen days after this judgment has been served, plus the statutory interest as referred to in art. 6: 119 BW on this amount from December 30, 2020 until the day of full payment, 3.10. orders the defendant to pay an amount of € 20,258.00 (twenty thousand two hundred and fifty-eight euros) to the plaintiff sub 6 within fourteen days after this judgment has been served, plus the statutory interest as referred to in art. 6: 119 BW on this amount from December 30, 2020 until the day of full payment, 3.11. orders the defendant to pay the plaintiffs an amount of € 1,500.00 (fifteen hundred euros), plus the statutory interest as referred to in art. 6: 119 BW on this amount from December 30, 2020 until the day of full payment, 3.12. orders the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, estimated to date on the part of the plaintiffs at € 3,536.89, to be increased by the statutory interest as referred to in art. 6: 119 BW on this amount from the fourteenth day after the notification of this judgment until the day of full payment, 3.13. declares this judgment with regard to the provisions under 3.2. to 3.12. executable from stock, 3.14. rejects the more advanced or otherwise advanced. This judgment was rendered by mr. L. Voetelink and pronounced in public on February 24, 2021.1 1 type: AAK coll: