HBDI (Hesse) - 90.20.77:0245

From GDPRhub
Revision as of 23:10, 17 December 2021 by Baltpeter (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{DPAdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Germany |DPA-BG-Color=background-color:#ffffff; |DPAlogo=LogoDE-HE.png |DPA_Abbrevation=HBDI (Hesse) |DPA_With_Country=HBDI (Hesse) |Case_Numb...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
HBDI (Hesse) - 90.20.77:0245
LogoDE-HE.png
Authority: HBDI (Hesse)
Jurisdiction: Germany
Relevant Law: Article 12(6) GDPR
Type: Complaint
Outcome: Upheld
Started:
Decided: 20.11.2020
Published: 19.12.2020
Fine: None
Parties: ABIS GmbH
National Case Number/Name: 90.20.77:0245
European Case Law Identifier: n/a
Appeal: Not appealed
Original Language(s): German
Original Source: Datenanfragen.de (in DE)
Initial Contributor: Benjamin Altpeter

The DPA of Hesse (the HBDI) held that ABIS GmbH, an address management company, may not require a signature as identification for access requests as per Art. 12(6) GDPR and has to also respond to access requests via other transport mediums than postal mail.

English Summary

Facts

A data subject made an access request with ABIS, a German address management company. The company responded saying that the data subject had to provide a handwritten signature to authenticate their request, claiming they wouldn't be able to identify the data subject otherwise.

They further said they would only respond via postal mail.

Holding

The DPA held that the GDPR imposes no formal requirements on data subject requests and especially doesn't allow the controller to require a signature. The DPA said that a signature cannot even be used to uniquely identify a data subject.

The DPA further held that always requesting additional identification data from data subjects in response to requests violates Article 12(6) GDPR, which only allows this in the case of reasonable doubts concerning the identity of the data subject.

Finally, the DPA held that controllers have to respond to access request using different transport mediums, not only postal mail.

ABIS GmbH accepted the holding and confirmed to the DPA that they would cease both practices.

Comment

Share your comments here!

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!

English Machine Translation of the Decision

The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details.