CJEU - C-768/21 - Land Hessen

From GDPRhub
Revision as of 15:43, 25 February 2022 by Hha (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{CJEUdecisionBOX |Case_Number_Name=C-768/21 Land Hessen |ECLI= |Opinion_Link= |Judgement_Link=https://curia.europa.eu/juris/documents.jsf?oqp=&for=&mat=or&lgrec=en&jge=&td=...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
CJEU - C-768/21 Land Hessen
Cjeulogo.png
Court: CJEU
Jurisdiction: European Union
Relevant Law: Article 57(1)(a) GDPR
Article 57(1)(f) GDPR
Article 58(2) GDPR
Article 77(1) GDPR
Decided:
Parties: VG Wiesbaden
Land Hessen
Case Number/Name: C-768/21 Land Hessen
European Case Law Identifier:
Reference from: VG Wiesbaden
6 K 1107/20
Language: 24 EU Languages
Original Source: Judgement
Initial Contributor: Heiko Hanusch


See Holding for questions referred.

English Summary

Facts

Facts pending decision.

Holding

Are Article 57(1)(a) and (f) and Article 58(2)(a) to (j) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation, ‘the GDPR’, OJ 2016 L 119, p. 1), read in combination with Article 77(1) thereof, to be understood as meaning that, where the supervisory authority finds that data processing has infringed the data subject’s rights, the supervisory authority must always take action in accordance with Article 58(2) of the GDPR?

Comment

Share your comments here!

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!