Rb. Amsterdam - ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2023:7218

From GDPRhub
Revision as of 15:04, 11 December 2023 by Aa (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{COURTdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Netherlands |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo=Courts_logo1.png |Court_Abbrevation=Rb. Amsterdam |Court_Original_Name=Rechtbank Amsterdam |Court_English_Name=District Court Amsterdam |Court_With_Country=Rb. Amsterdam (Netherlands) |Case_Number_Name=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2023:7218 |ECLI=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2023:7218 |Original_Source_Name_1=de Rechtspraak |Original_Source_Link_1=https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/#!/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2023:7218&showbutt...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Rb. Amsterdam - ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2023:7218
Courts logo1.png
Court: Rb. Amsterdam (Netherlands)
Jurisdiction: Netherlands
Relevant Law: Article 6(1)(f) GDPR
Decided: 15.11.2023
Published: 01.12.2023
Parties: Rabobank
National Case Number/Name: ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2023:7218
European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2023:7218
Appeal from:
Appeal to:
Original Language(s): Dutch
Original Source: de Rechtspraak (in Dutch)
Initial Contributor: n/a

A Court refused to enforce a data subject's objection to processing (Article 21(1) GDPR), which requested that their negative registration be removed from the Netherlands' national Credit Information System, as the data subject had no overriding legitimate interest.

English Summary

Facts

f

Holding

f

Comment

Share your comments here!

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!

English Machine Translation of the Decision

The decision below is a machine translation of the Dutch original. Please refer to the Dutch original for more details.