Accurate titles for the decisions of DPAs: Difference between revisions

From GDPRhub
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 9: Line 9:
|-
|-
|Belgium
|Belgium
|
|APD/GBA (Belgium) - XX/year
|-
|-
|Bulgaria
|Bulgaria
|
|CPDP (Bulgaria) - PNN - XX-XX/year
|-
|-
|Croatia
|Croatia
|
|AZOP (Croatia) - DD-MM-YYYY
|-
|-
|Cyprus
|Cyprus
|
|Commissioner (Cyprus) - number of the decision
|-
|-
|Czech  Republic
|Czech  Republic
|
|UOOU (Czech Republic) - number of the decision
|-
|-
|Denmark
|Denmark
|
|Datatilsynet (Denmark) - year-XX-XXXX
|-
|-
|Estonia
|Estonia
Line 33: Line 33:
|-
|-
|Finland
|Finland
|
|Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - number of the case
|-
|-
|France
|France
|
|CNIL (France) - SAN-year-XXX
|-
|-
|Germany
|Germany
Line 42: Line 42:
|-
|-
|Greece
|Greece
|
|HDPA (Greece) - XX/year
|-
|-
|Hungary
|Hungary
|
|NAIH (Hungary) - number of the case
|-
|-
|Iceland
|Iceland
|
|Persónuvernd (Iceland) - number of the case
|-
|-
|Ireland
|Ireland
|
|DPC (Ireland) - number of the case
|-
|-
|Italy
|Italy
Line 57: Line 57:
|-
|-
|Latvia
|Latvia
|
|DVI (Latvia) - name of the case
|-
|-
|Liechtenstein
|Liechtenstein
Line 66: Line 66:
|-
|-
|Luxembourg
|Luxembourg
|
|CNPD (Luxembourg) - Délibération n° XXFR/year
|-
|-
|Malta
|Malta
|
|IDPC (Malta) - CDP/XXXX/XX/year
|-
|-
|Netherlands
|Netherlands
Line 78: Line 78:
|-
|-
|Norway
|Norway
|
|Datatilsynet (Norway) - XX/XXXXX
|-
|-
|Other
|Other
Line 84: Line 84:
|-
|-
|Poland
|Poland
|
|UODO (Poland) - number of the case
|-
|-
|Portugal
|Portugal
|
|CNPD (Portugal) - Deliberação year/XX
|-
|-
|Romania
|Romania
Line 96: Line 96:
|-
|-
|Slovenia
|Slovenia
|
|IP (Slovenia) - number of the case
|-
|-
|Spain
|Spain
|
|AEPD (Spain) - number of the case
|-
|-
|Sweden
|Sweden
|
|Datainspektionen (Sweden) - DI-year-XXXX
|-
|-
|Switzerland
|Switzerland
Line 108: Line 108:
|-
|-
|United  Kingdom
|United  Kingdom
|
|ICO (UK) - name of the case/of the parties
|}
|}

Latest revision as of 09:30, 28 March 2024

Given that GDPRhub.eu serves as a research tool for both experts and non-experts, it is important that the decisions uploaded on the platform are easily discoverable. Thus, we aim for that the decisions are named in a uniform way in order to ensure quick and easy searches.

DPA Title of the decision of that DPA
Austria DSB (Austria) - year-0.XXX.XXX
Belgium APD/GBA (Belgium) - XX/year
Bulgaria CPDP (Bulgaria) - PNN - XX-XX/year
Croatia AZOP (Croatia) - DD-MM-YYYY
Cyprus Commissioner (Cyprus) - number of the decision
Czech Republic UOOU (Czech Republic) - number of the decision
Denmark Datatilsynet (Denmark) - year-XX-XXXX
Estonia AKI (Estonia) - 2.1.-X/XX/XXXX
European Union
Finland Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - number of the case
France CNIL (France) - SAN-year-XXX
Germany Each DPA has its own rules
Greece HDPA (Greece) - XX/year
Hungary NAIH (Hungary) - number of the case
Iceland Persónuvernd (Iceland) - number of the case
Ireland DPC (Ireland) - number of the case
Italy Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - XXXXXXX
Latvia DVI (Latvia) - name of the case
Liechtenstein
Lithuania ADA (Lithuania) - name of the case/of the parties
Luxembourg CNPD (Luxembourg) - Délibération n° XXFR/year
Malta IDPC (Malta) - CDP/XXXX/XX/year
Netherlands AP (The Netherlands) - name of the case
News
Norway Datatilsynet (Norway) - XX/XXXXX
Other
Poland UODO (Poland) - number of the case
Portugal CNPD (Portugal) - Deliberação year/XX
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia IP (Slovenia) - number of the case
Spain AEPD (Spain) - number of the case
Sweden Datainspektionen (Sweden) - DI-year-XXXX
Switzerland
United Kingdom ICO (UK) - name of the case/of the parties