CJEU - C-33/22 - Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde: Difference between revisions
From GDPRhub
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
}} | }} | ||
The CJEU decided that the GDPR applies to a national parliamentary committees and that its activity was not related to safeguarding national security under Article 2(2)(a) GDPR. | |||
==English Summary== | ==English Summary== | ||
=== Facts === | === Facts === | ||
f | |||
=== Holding === | === Holding === | ||
The CJEU held that | |||
== Comment == | == Comment == | ||
Revision as of 15:59, 23 January 2024
| CJEU - C-33/22 Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court: | CJEU |
| Jurisdiction: | European Union |
| Relevant Law: | Article 2(2)(a) GDPR Article 4(7) GDPR 16(2) TFEU |
| Decided: | |
| Parties: | |
| Case Number/Name: | C-33/22 Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde |
| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EU:C:2024:46 |
| Reference from: | |
| Language: | 24 EU Languages |
| Original Source: | AG Opinion Judgement |
| Initial Contributor: | sh |
The CJEU decided that the GDPR applies to a national parliamentary committees and that its activity was not related to safeguarding national security under Article 2(2)(a) GDPR.
English Summary
Facts
f
Holding
The CJEU held that
Comment
Share your comments here!
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
