CJEU - C-33/22 - Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde: Difference between revisions
From GDPRhub
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
}} | }} | ||
The CJEU decided that the GDPR applies to | The CJEU decided that the GDPR applies to national parliamentary committees and that its activity was not related to safeguarding national security meaning that it was not exempt under Article 2(2)(a) GDPR. | ||
==English Summary== | ==English Summary== | ||
=== Facts === | === Facts === | ||
A data subject gave | |||
=== Holding === | === Holding === | ||
The CJEU held that | The CJEU held that | ||
'''On the first question:''' | |||
'''On the second question:''' | |||
'''On the third question:''' | |||
== Comment == | == Comment == | ||
' | This case succeeds C-272/19 Land Hessen, which is also about Parliamentary Committee's. | ||
== Further Resources == | == Further Resources == | ||
''Share blogs or news articles here!'' | ''Share blogs or news articles here!'' | ||
Revision as of 16:06, 23 January 2024
| CJEU - C-33/22 Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court: | CJEU |
| Jurisdiction: | European Union |
| Relevant Law: | Article 2(2)(a) GDPR Article 4(7) GDPR 16(2) TFEU |
| Decided: | |
| Parties: | |
| Case Number/Name: | C-33/22 Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde |
| European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:EU:C:2024:46 |
| Reference from: | |
| Language: | 24 EU Languages |
| Original Source: | AG Opinion Judgement |
| Initial Contributor: | sh |
The CJEU decided that the GDPR applies to national parliamentary committees and that its activity was not related to safeguarding national security meaning that it was not exempt under Article 2(2)(a) GDPR.
English Summary
Facts
A data subject gave
Holding
The CJEU held that
On the first question:
On the second question:
On the third question:
Comment
This case succeeds C-272/19 Land Hessen, which is also about Parliamentary Committee's.
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
