|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | #REDIRECT [[CJEU - C‑645/19 - Facebook Ireland and others v Gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit]] |
| [[Category:CJEU|F]] | | [[Category:CJEU|F]] |
| {| class="wikitable" style="width: 25%; margin-left: 10px; float:right;"
| |
| ! colspan="2" |
| |
| CJEU - C-645/19 - Facebook v. Belgian DPA
| |
| |-
| |
| | colspan="2" style="padding: 20px; background-color:#9c1b20;" |[[File:Cjeulogo.png|center|150px]]
| |
| |-
| |
| |Court:||[[:Category:CJEU|CJEU]]
| |
| |-
| |
| |Jurisdiction:||[[:Category:European Court Decisions|EU]]
| |
|
| |
|
| |-
| |
| [[Category:European Union]]
| |
| |Relevant Law:||[[Article 55 GDPR#1|Article 55(1) GDPR]]
| |
| [[Category:Article 55 GDPR|1]]
| |
|
| |
| [[Article 56 GDPR]]
| |
| [[Category: Article 56 GDPR]] | | [[Category: Article 56 GDPR]] |
|
| |
| [[Article 57 GDPR]]
| |
| [[Category: Article 57 GDPR]] | | [[Category: Article 57 GDPR]] |
|
| |
| [[Article 58 GDPR]]
| |
| [[Category: Article 58 GDPR]] | | [[Category: Article 58 GDPR]] |
|
| |
| [[Article 60 GDPR]]
| |
| [[Category: Article 60 GDPR]] | | [[Category: Article 60 GDPR]] |
|
| |
| [[Article 61 GDPR]]
| |
| [[Category: Article 61 GDPR]] | | [[Category: Article 61 GDPR]] |
|
| |
| [[Article 62 GDPR]]
| |
| [[Category: Article 62 GDPR]] | | [[Category: Article 62 GDPR]] |
|
| |
| [[Article 63 GDPR]]
| |
| [[Category: Article 63 GDPR]] | | [[Category: Article 63 GDPR]] |
|
| |
| [[Article 64 GDPR]]
| |
| [[Category: Article 64 GDPR]] | | [[Category: Article 64 GDPR]] |
|
| |
| [[Article 65 GDPR]]
| |
| [[Category: Article 65 GDPR]] | | [[Category: Article 65 GDPR]] |
|
| |
| [[Article 66 GDPR]]
| |
| [[Category: Article 66 GDPR]] | | [[Category: Article 66 GDPR]] |
|
| |
| [[Article 67 GDPR]]
| |
| [[Category: Article 67 GDPR]] | | [[Category: Article 67 GDPR]] |
|
| |
| [[Article 68 GDPR]]
| |
| [[Category: Article 68 GDPR]] | | [[Category: Article 68 GDPR]] |
| |-
| | [[index.php?title=Category:Article 55 GDPR|1]] |
| |Decided:||30.08.2019
| |
| |-
| |
| |Published:||n/a
| |
| |-
| |
| |Parties:||[https://about.fb.com/ Facebook]
| |
| | |
| [https://www.gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit.be/ Belgian DPA] | |
| |-
| |
| |Case Number:||C-645/19
| |
| |-
| |
| |European Case Law Identifier:||<small>n/a</small>
| |
| |-
| |
| |Referring Court:||[[:Category:Court of Appeal of Brussels (Belgium)|Court of Appeal of Brussels]]
| |
| |-
| |
| |Language:||24 EU Languages
| |
| |-
| |
| |Original Source:||[http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=DB3F3A7754FA45222B5B5EB611D9E2E0?text=2016%252F679&docid=221193&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=req&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=5287027#ctx1 InfoCuria Case-law (in EN)]
| |
| |}
| |
| | |
| The Court of Appeal of Belgium made a reference for a preliminary ruling to the CJEU in a case between Facebook Ireland Limited, Facebook Inc., Facebook Belgium BVBA and the Belgian DPA concerning the interpretation of the GDPR provisions on the competence, tasks and powers of the supervisory authorities as well as the cooperation and consistency mechanism for the supervisory authorities (Articles 55(1), 56 to 58 and 60 to 66 GDPR).
| |
| | |
| The main question was whether a supervisory authority should have the power to commence legal proceedings before a court in its Member State for infringements of the GDPR in connection with cross-border processing if it is not the lead supervisory authority for that cross-border processing.
| |
| | |
| ==English Summary==
| |
| | |
| ===Questions referred===
| |
| | |
| * Should Articles (55)(1), 56 to 58 and 60 to 66 GDPR, read in conjunction with Articles 7, 8 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, be interpreted as meaning that a supervisory authority which, pursuant to national law adopted in implementation of [[Article 58 GDPR#5|Article 58(5) GDPR]] of that regulation, has the power to commence legal proceedings before a court in its Member State against infringements of that regulation cannot exercise that power in connection with cross-border processing if it is not the lead supervisory authority for that cross-border processing?
| |
| | |
| * Does it make a difference if the controller of that cross-border processing does not have its main establishment in that Member State but does have another establishment there?
| |
| * Does it make a difference whether the national supervisory authority commences the legal proceedings against the controller’s main establishment or against the establishment in its own Member State?
| |
| * Does it make a difference if the national supervisory authority had already commenced the legal proceedings before the date on which the regulation entered into force (25 May 2018)?
| |
| * If the first question is answered in the affirmative, does [[Article 58 GDPR#5|Article 58(5) GDPR]] have direct effect, such that a national supervisory authority can rely on the aforementioned article to commence or continue legal proceedings against private parties even if [[Article 58 GDPR#5|Article 58(5) GDPR]] has not been specifically transposed into the legislation of the Member States, notwithstanding the requirement to do so?
| |
| | |
| * If the previous questions are answered in the affirmative, could the outcome of such proceedings prevent the lead supervisory authority from reaching a conclusion to the contrary, in the event that the lead supervisory authority investigates the same or similar cross-border processing activities in accordance with the mechanism laid down in [[Article 56 GDPR]] and [[Article 60 GDPR]]?
| |
| | |
| [[Category: Article 56 GDPR]] | | [[Category: Article 56 GDPR]] |
| [[Category: Article 60 GDPR]] | | [[Category: Article 60 GDPR]] |
| ==Comment==
| |
| ''Share your comment here!''
| |
|
| |
| ==Further Resources==
| |
| ''Share blogs or news articles here!''
| |
| <references />
| |
