CJEU - Case C‑456/22 - Gemeinde Ummendorf: Difference between revisions

From GDPRhub
(Created page with "{{CJEUdecisionBOX |Case_Number_Name=Case C‑456/22 Gemeinde Ummendorf |ECLI=ECLI:EU:C:2023:988 |Opinion_Link= |Judgement_Link=https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=280630&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=864707 |Date_Decided= |Year= |GDPR_Article_1=Article 82(1) GDPR |GDPR_Article_Link_1=Article 82 GDPR#1 |GDPR_Article_2= |GDPR_Article_Link_2= |GDPR_Article_3= |GDPR_Article_Link_3= |EU_Law_Name_1= |EU_Law_Link_1= |...")
 
No edit summary
Line 39: Line 39:
}}
}}


h
The CJEU decided that Article 82(1) precludes any national legislation or practice which sets a ''deminimis'' threshold to establish non-material damages under the GDPR.


==English Summary==
==English Summary==


=== Facts ===
=== Facts ===
h
In June 2020 both the Municipality of Ummendorf and the Administrative Court of Sigmaringen, published without consent the name of a data subject. The Mun


=== Holding ===
=== Holding ===

Revision as of 16:21, 29 January 2024

CJEU - Case C‑456/22 Gemeinde Ummendorf
Cjeulogo.png
Court: CJEU
Jurisdiction: European Union
Relevant Law: Article 82(1) GDPR
Decided:
Parties:
Case Number/Name: Case C‑456/22 Gemeinde Ummendorf
European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2023:988
Reference from:
Language: 24 EU Languages
Original Source: Judgement
Initial Contributor: n/a

The CJEU decided that Article 82(1) precludes any national legislation or practice which sets a deminimis threshold to establish non-material damages under the GDPR.

English Summary

Facts

In June 2020 both the Municipality of Ummendorf and the Administrative Court of Sigmaringen, published without consent the name of a data subject. The Mun

Holding

h

Comment

h

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!