Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9669974
|Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9669974|
|Authority:||Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy)|
|Relevant Law:||Article 5(1)(c) GDPR|
Article 5(1)(a) GDPR
Article 6 GDPR
Article 9 GDPR
Article 13 GDPR
Article 35 GDPR
Article 88 GDPR
Article 113 and 114 Codice in materia di protezione dei dati personali
|Parties:||Municipality of Bolzano|
|National Case Number/Name:||9669974|
|European Case Law Identifier:||n/a|
|Original Source:||Garante Privacy (in IT)|
The Italian DPA (Garante) fined the Municipality of Bolzano €84,000 for indiscriminate monitoring of employees in violation of Articles 5 (1)(a) and (c), 6, 9,13, 88, and 35 GDPR.
English Summary[edit | edit source]
Facts[edit | edit source]
An employee of the Municipality of Bolzano alleged that the Municipality was violating its duty to protect personal data by monitoring the network traffic and individual Internet accesses of the complainant and of employees in general.
The complaint alleges a violation of the principles of lawfulness, accuracy and data minimisation in the processing of the personal data of the Municipality's employees. The system for recording Internet access registration used by the Municipality allows for massive, constant and indiscriminate monitoring, tracing, and filtering of the chronology of the internet sites visited and the time of browsing for each site, as well as the storage and retention of the data associated with each employee for a long period of time.
The processing was allegedly carried out in the absence of any information to the employees about the possible controls on Internet access by the employer.
Holding[edit | edit source]
The Italian DPA's investigations revealed that the municipality had been using, for about ten years, a system for monitoring and filtering employees' internet browsing that stores employee data for one month and creates reports for network security purposes. It characterized the system as carrying out the preventive and generalised collection of data on websites visited by individual employees. Although the employer had entered into an agreement regarding data collection with the trade unions, as required by the sectoral regulations, the DPA pointed out that such data processing must also comply with the data protection principles laid down in the GDPR.
The DPA (Garante) held that the municipality failed to adequately inform employees about the data processing system, which allowed processing operations that were unnecessary and disproportionate to the purpose of protecting and securing the internal network. The system also collected information unrelated to professional activity that related to the private life of employees.
The Garante argued that the need to reduce the risk of improper use of Internet surfing cannot lead to the complete annulment of any expectation of privacy on the part of the employee in the workplace, even where the employee uses the network services made available by the employer. The Garante also pointed out that the municipality of Bolzano failed to carry out a data protection impact assessment.
Furthermore, the Garante found violations with regard to the processing of employees' medical data: the form to be filled in for special medical requests required the manager of the unit to examine it, resulting in the unlawful processing of health data.
For all these reasons, and with the power conferred by Articles 58(2)(i) and 83 GDPR, the Garante fined the Municipality of Bolzano €84,000 for indiscriminate monitoring of employees in violation of Articles 5 (1)(a) and (c), 6, 9,13, 88, and 35 GDPR. The Garante also ordered the Municipality to take technical and organisational measures to anonymise data relating to employees' workstations, delete personal data in recorded web navigation logs, and update the internal procedures identified and included in the trade union agreement.
Comment[edit | edit source]
Share your comments here!
Further Resources[edit | edit source]
Share blogs or news articles here!
English Machine Translation of the Decision[edit | edit source]
The decision below is a machine translation of the Italian original. Please refer to the Italian original for more details.