ICO - FER0851659: Difference between revisions

From GDPRhub
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 25%; margin-left: 10px; float:right;"
{{DPAdecisionBOX
! colspan="2" |ICO - FER0851659
|-
| colspan="2" style="padding: 20px; background-color:#023868;" |[[File:ICOLOGO.png|center]]
|-
|Authority:||[[ICO (UK)]]
[[Category:ICO (UK)]]
|-
| Jurisdiction: || [[Data Protection in the United Kingdom|United Kingdom]] [[Category: United Kingdom]]
|-
|Relevant Law:||[[Article 4 GDPR#1|Article 4(1) GDPR]]
[[Category:Article 4(1) GDPR]]


[[Article 9 GDPR]]
|Jurisdiction=United Kingdom
[[Category:Article 9 GDPR]]
|DPA-BG-Color=background-color:#023868;
|DPAlogo=LogoUK.png
|DPA_Abbrevation=ICO (UK)
|DPA_With_Country=ICO (UK)


[[Article 10 GDPR]]
|Case_Number_Name=FER0851659
[[Category:Article 10 GDPR]]
|ECLI=


[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/3391/contents/made Regulation 5(3) EIR]
|Original_Source_Name_1=ICO
|-
|Original_Source_Link_1=https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2019/2616232/fer0851659.pdf
|Type:||Complaint
|Original_Source_Language_1=English
|-
|Original_Source_Language__Code_1=EN
|Outcome:||Rejected
|Original_Source_Name_2=
|-
|Original_Source_Link_2=
|Decided:||01.11.2019
|Original_Source_Language_2=
[[Category:2019]]
|Original_Source_Language__Code_2=
|-
 
|Published:||n/a
|Type=Complaint
|-
|Outcome=Rejected
|Fine:||none
|Date_Started=
|-
|Date_Decided=01.11.2019
|Parties:||[https://www.canterbury.gov.uk/ Canterbury City Council]
|Date_Published=
|-
|Year=2019
|National Case Number:||FER0851659
|Fine=None
|-
|Currency=
|European Case Law Identifier:||n/a
 
|-
|GDPR_Article_1=Article 4(1) GDPR
|Appeal:||n/a
|GDPR_Article_Link_1=Article 4 GDPR#1
|-
|GDPR_Article_2=Article 9 GDPR
|Original Language:||[[Category:English]]
|GDPR_Article_Link_2=Article 9 GDPR
English
|GDPR_Article_3=Article 10 GDPR
|-
|GDPR_Article_Link_3=Article 10 GDPR
|Original Source:||[https://ico.org.uk/media/action-weve-taken/decision-notices/2019/2616232/fer0851659.pdf ICO (EN)]
|GDPR_Article_4=
|}  
|GDPR_Article_Link_4=
|GDPR_Article_5=
|GDPR_Article_Link_5=
 
|EU_Law_Name_1=
|EU_Law_Link_1=
|EU_Law_Name_2=
|EU_Law_Link_2=
 
|National_Law_Name_1=Regulation 5(3) EIR
|National_Law_Link_1=http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2004/3391/contents/made
|National_Law_Name_2=
|National_Law_Link_2=
|National_Law_Name_3=
|National_Law_Link_3=
 
|Party_Name_1=Canterbury City Council
|Party_Link_1=https://www.canterbury.gov.uk/
|Party_Name_2=
|Party_Link_2=
|Party_Name_3=
|Party_Link_3=
 
|Appeal_To_Body=
|Appeal_To_Case_Number_Name=
|Appeal_To_Status=
|Appeal_To_Link=
 
|Initial_Contributor=
|
}}


The ICO issued a decision related to disclosure of information held by public authorities which was likely to include personal data.
The ICO issued a decision related to disclosure of information held by public authorities which was likely to include personal data.
Line 50: Line 72:


===Facts===
===Facts===
The complainant has requested the disclosure of information about complaints concerning a property over a defined time period. Canterbury City Council (the Council) withheld the information because it considered that the information requested was the personal data of third parties. Thus, the disclosure would have breach the GDPR principles. The complainant challenged the decision before the ICO.   
The complainant has requested the disclosure of information about third-parties´ complaints concerning his property. Canterbury City Council withheld the information as disclosure would imply the unjustified communication of such third parties. Thus, the disclosure would have breached the GDPR principles. The complainant challenged the decision before the ICO.   


===Dispute===
===Dispute===  
Are the information contained in the complaints sensitive personal data? Would a disclosure to the word art large and not to the complainant only, contravene GDPR principles ?


===Holding===
===Holding===   
The ICO decided that "as the complainant and his family have either owned or occupied the land in question during the time period specified, all the information falling within the scope of the request is in fact the complainant’s own personal data". The ICO applied Regulation 5(3) of the Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR) which prevents disclosure to the world at large of information including personal data. Also, the ICO considered that the personal data at issue were criminal offence data about the complainant, as described by Article 10 GDPR, and not special category of personal data, as described by Article 9 GDPR.  


==Comment==
==Comment==

Latest revision as of 16:11, 7 March 2022

ICO (UK) - FER0851659
LogoUK.png
Authority: ICO (UK)
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Relevant Law: Article 4(1) GDPR
Article 9 GDPR
Article 10 GDPR
Regulation 5(3) EIR
Type: Complaint
Outcome: Rejected
Started:
Decided: 01.11.2019
Published:
Fine: None
Parties: Canterbury City Council
National Case Number/Name: FER0851659
European Case Law Identifier: n/a
Appeal: n/a
Original Language(s): English
Original Source: ICO (in EN)
Initial Contributor: n/a

The ICO issued a decision related to disclosure of information held by public authorities which was likely to include personal data.

English Summary

Facts

The complainant has requested the disclosure of information about third-parties´ complaints concerning his property. Canterbury City Council withheld the information as disclosure would imply the unjustified communication of such third parties. Thus, the disclosure would have breached the GDPR principles. The complainant challenged the decision before the ICO.

Dispute

Holding

Comment

Share your comments here!

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!

English official version

 to be completed..
Retrieved from "https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=ICO_-_FER0851659&oldid=24203"
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
Powered by MediaWiki