OGH - 6Ob127/20z

From GDPRhub
Revision as of 08:32, 8 April 2021 by MB (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{COURTdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Austria |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo=Courts_logo1.png |Court_Abbrevation=OGH |Court_With_Country=OGH (Austria) |Case_Number_Name=6Ob127/20z...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
OGH - 6Ob127/20z
Courts logo1.png
Court: OGH (Austria)
Jurisdiction: Austria
Relevant Law: Article 4(1) GDPR
Article 15(1) GDPR
Article 79 GDPR
§ 151 Austrian Trade Regulation Act (Gewerbeordnung 1994 - GewO)
Decided: 18.02.2021
Published: 01.04.2021
Parties: unknown (claimant)
Österreichische Post AG (defendant)
National Case Number/Name: 6Ob127/20z
European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:AT:OGH0002:2021:0060OB00127.20Z.0218.000
Appeal from: OLG Linz
2 R 35/20k-19
Appeal to: Not appealed
Original Language(s): German
Original Source: Rechtsinformationssystem des Bundes (RIS) (in German)
Initial Contributor: n/a

The Austrian Supreme Court held that a court must not issue a declaratory judgement that a controller has to provide access to certain data under Article 15 GDPR to a data subject if the controller had already fulfilled the data subject's requests for access and deletion and refrained from further processing the data subject's data.


English Summary

Facts

Lorem ipsum

Dispute

Lorem ipsum

Holding

The Austrian Supreme Court overturned a decision of the Higher Regional Court Linz and restored the decision of the first instance court:

Comment

Share your comments here!

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!

English Machine Translation of the Decision

The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details.