Rb. Amsterdam - AMS 22/5458: Revision history

From GDPRhub

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

13 September 2023

7 September 2023

  • curprev 09:4509:45, 7 September 2023Aa talk contribsm 27,537 bytes +179 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 09:4209:42, 7 September 2023Aa talk contribs 27,358 bytes +379 overall good! Just remember the formatting rules ( so you wrote Article 12 para 2 AVG, but just remember to convert to noyb formatting = Article 12(2) GDPR) . I rewrote some sentences to be shorter and used simpler words to describe things (not all of our readers have a legal background), but your legal analysis of the reasoning generally was very good! Well done! Tag: Visual edit

1 September 2023

  • curprev 17:3417:34, 1 September 2023Nur-khmeydan talk contribs 26,979 bytes +26,979 Created page with "{{COURTdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Netherlands |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo=Courts_logo1.png |Court_Abbrevation=Rb. Amsterdam |Court_Original_Name=Rechtbank Amsterdam |Court_English_Name=District Court Amsterdam |Court_With_Country=Rb. Amsterdam (Netherlands) |Case_Number_Name=AMS 22/5458 |ECLI=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2023:5074 |Original_Source_Name_1=de Rechtspraak |Original_Source_Link_1=https://uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl/#!/details?id=ECLI:NL:RBAMS:2023:5074&showbutton=true&keyw..." Tag: submission [1.0]