Search results

controller's behalf should be established. In particular, the controller should be obliged to implement appropriate and effective measures and be able to demonstrate

may not be considered to be ‘necessary’. In this context, the CJEU expressly recalled that the condition relating to the need for processing must be examined

this will usually be printed. There is no duty to provide the information in a format that can be kept by the data subject, it must only be "provided". It

subject be concise, easily accessible and easy to understand, and that clear and plain language and, additionally, where appropriate, visualisation be used

always be considered with the potential harm (i.e. damage); therefore it could be argued that a potential risk of e.g. “destruction” will not be (very)

pseudonymisation, which could be attributed to a natural person by the use of additional information should be considered to be information on an identifiable

it can be assumed that the SAs may be given additional powers, but that the existing powers may not be restricted. A contrary view cannot be derived from

processing to be carried out. The description of personal data used should be as precise as possible, while still being concise. Usually this can be achieved

criteria should be used. According to Voigt and von dem Bussche, “the former should be the case, as otherwise the obligation would be too much of a burden

the infringement to be punished is to this code of conduct, the less this criterion may be taken into account. Otherwise, there would be a violation of the

Interest of a Natural Person The processing of personal data should also be regarded to be lawful where it is necessary to protect an interest which is essential

order to be effective, data protection must be implemented ex ante. Hence, the controller must define the privacy requirements that need to be taken into

circumstances of the case. Where personal data can be legitimately disclosed to another recipient, the data subject should be informed when the personal data are first

controller's behalf should be established. In particular, the controller should be obliged to implement appropriate and effective measures and be able to demonstrate

referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall be explicitly brought to the attention of the data subject and shall be presented clearly and separately from any

consent should be given for all of them. If the data subject's consent is to be given following a request by electronic means, the request must be clear, concise

determining the purposes and means of processing, the processor shall be considered to be a controller in respect of that processing. Recital 81: Entrusting

information can be obtained; (c) describe the likely consequences of the personal data breach; (d) describe the measures taken or proposed to be taken by the

involved in processing shall be liable for the damage caused by processing which infringes this Regulation. A processor shall be liable for the damage caused

nnees.be/introduire-une-requete-une-plainte In Dutch: https://www.gegevensbeschermingsautoriteit.be/verzoek-klacht-indienen The complaint can be sent by