Search results

judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 20 February 2024, III OSK 2700/22. The allegation of violation of this provision was not raised in the cassation

holder of the DSB-approval for code U*** was explicitly against A*** GmbH beeing accredited to monitor compliance with this code of conduct The holder of

[sic] of your vroag to your data no longer use.l-rarr 0r-0BCI0r9qsess-000q-BEes-ÍlL-0I-il5.7lEíÍEffiJ Page 6 Court of Appeal Brussels-2020/ARh1.60- p. 5However

July 22, 2020, the Disputes Chamber will decide on the basis of art. 63, 2° and 94, 1° WOG an examination to ask the Inspectorate. 7. On July 22, 2020

will be notified that the hearing will take place on September 22, 2022. 16. On September 22, 2022, the parties will be heard by the Disputes Chamber. 17

data, which allows recording of telephone conversations provided that the bee the communication involved parties are informed of before registration the

which for the setting or reading of cookies 22 no prior consent should be obtained from the data subject: 22In so far as relevant, Section 129 WEC reads

an objection on 22 January 2021; e. The French SA raised an objection on 22 January 2021; f. The Italian SA raised an objection on 22 January 2021; g.