Search results

under Article 6(4) GDPR and further processing for a compatible purpose under Article 6(4) GDPR. See the commentary on Article 6(4) GDPR for details on the

love. In other words, Replika provides a kind of 'virtual friend' that users can configure as friend, partner or mentor. Various reports were published in

litigation chamber concluded that the "invite a friend" function of a social media platform violates the GDPR since consent from the users was not collected

since these data had been provided by a friend of his; that in the message that the claimant receives from his friend at no time does he state that he has

the household exception of Article 2(2)(c) GDPR. The data subject had a phone call via Whatsapp with a friend (the controller) in which she confessed to

has access because he had made a commercial call infringe Article 5 of the GDPR? The DPA held that the entity who was the object of the complaint was not

processing data from a public registry without a legal basis under Article 6 GDPR. A citizen filled a complaint with the AEPD regarding the unlawful processing

controller, to correct its data processing practice in accordance with the GDPR. This decision does not assess the activities of the police in relation to

a) of the GDPR. two. ORDER TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF RIBADEDEVA ( *** POSITION 1 ) according with the provisions of article 58.2 d) of the GDPR, so that you

in conjunction with Article 7 GDPR, which cannot be superseded by relying on Article 6(1)(b) GDPR? Is Article 5(1)(c) GDPR (data minimisation) to be interpreted

unauthorized consultation of the National Register as they were allegedly a friend of the data subject, seeking to find out about her after 25 years. After

the facts of the case have a logical connection with other GDPR Articles, such as Article 32 GDPR, about the security of processing, the AEPD did not consider

as well as Article 6(1) GDPR and (II.) §§ 12, 50a and 50d of the Austrian Data Protection Act (DSG). The violations of the GDPR was taxed with EUR 1,200

Article 5(2) GDPR in conjunction with Article 5(1)(a) GDPR. Failure to demonstrate that processing is performed in accordance with the GDPR The DPA noted

to Article 17 GDPR. Controller is Defam, a credit provider. Data subject took out a credit of €10,000 for their friend, because the friend wanted to open

data in the context of telephone jokes. Article 6 GDPR (legality of processing) and Articles 13 and 14 GDPR (transparency) were infringed. The decision is

audit is permissible. REASONS FOR DECISION: P***** F*****, hairdresser and friend of the plaintiff, suggested a hair transplant at the defendant party. The

Protection (LOPD, former national law previous to the application of the GDPR, not applicable anymore) in relation to four jokes made between April and

Warning System for Financial Institutions, in order to then verify whether the GDPR legislation has been respected. The national legislation is used to determine

6(1)(f) GDPR, issued a €30,500 fine and ordered them to implement internal controls of their credit rating process in line with Article 24 GDPR. Interestingly