User contributions for FD

09:0309:03, 24 November 2021 diff hist −12‎ UKSC - Richard Lloyd v Google LLC (2021) UKSC 50 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
08:5108:51, 24 November 2021 diff hist 0‎ TA Luxembourg - N° 46416 ‎No edit summary current Tag: Visual edit
08:4008:40, 24 November 2021 diff hist +73‎ HDPA (Greece) - 50/2021 ‎ →‎Facts Tag: Visual edit
08:3908:39, 24 November 2021 diff hist +3‎ HDPA (Greece) - 50/2021 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
08:3908:39, 24 November 2021 diff hist +280‎ HDPA (Greece) - 50/2021 ‎ Great summary! I added a bit of context and shortened the intro. I made sure that the name of the parties where used in a consistent manner (e.g. the Ministry; the HDPA). I changed some verbs to the past tense, as required by our Style Guide. I corrected or simplified some sentences here and there :) Thank you again! Tag: Visual edit

12:2012:20, 17 November 2021 diff hist 0‎ GHAL - 200.254.914 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
12:1312:13, 17 November 2021 diff hist +4‎ CNPD (Luxembourg) - Délibération n° 38FR/2021 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
12:1112:11, 17 November 2021 diff hist +4‎ CNIL (France) - MEDP-2021-001 ‎No edit summary current Tag: Visual edit
10:5910:59, 17 November 2021 diff hist −50‎ CNPD (Luxembourg) - Délibération n° 35FR/2021 ‎ →‎Facts current Tag: Visual edit
10:5710:57, 17 November 2021 diff hist −33‎ CNPD (Luxembourg) - Délibération n° 35FR/2021 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
10:5610:56, 17 November 2021 diff hist +928‎ CNPD (Luxembourg) - Délibération n° 35FR/2021 ‎ I reformatted the structure in line with the heading and sub-heading of the GDPRhub ; I simplified and corrected the language where necessary (e.g. "to issue an injunction" ; not "to deliver an order" ); I shortened the summary so that it would fit in the Newsletter ; I corrected the formatting (better not to use "underline" or "bold"); I corrected references to the GDPR (e.g. Article 5(1)(c) GDPR; not Article 5(1), c) GDPR)! Thank you! :D Tag: Visual edit

15:1715:17, 15 November 2021 diff hist +1‎ CNIL (France) - MEDP-2021-001 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
15:1715:17, 15 November 2021 diff hist +327‎ CNIL (France) - MEDP-2021-001 ‎ Thank you! super interesting summary! I corrected the grammar and the syntax where necessary. I made sure the name of the parties were consistent (e.g. Francetest ; the CNIL ; the Commission; etc). I corrected and specified some important legal terms (for example, not "delivered a notice" but "issued an injunction"; not "disclose" but rather "publish"). Please check the "compare tool" for more details ;) Tag: Visual edit
14:2314:23, 15 November 2021 diff hist +90‎ CNIL (France) - SAN-2021-019 ‎ Very interesting case! I corrected the English (grammar/syntax/vocabulary); I replaced some terms by the correct legal terms under the English version of the GDPR (e.g. the principle of 'conservation' does not exist --> the principle of storage limitation); I harmonised the names of the parties (not employees but 'agent' ; nor the DPA but the 'CNIL' ; etc); I added the hyperlinks to the GDPR Articles (make sure to use the correct format, i.e. Article 5(1)(c) GDPR; and not 'Art. 5.1.c. GDPR) ;) current Tag: Visual edit
14:1814:18, 15 November 2021 diff hist +70‎ CNIL (France) - SAN-2021-019 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
14:1714:17, 15 November 2021 diff hist +8‎ CNIL (France) - SAN-2021-019 ‎ →‎Holding Tag: Visual edit
14:1614:16, 15 November 2021 diff hist +664‎ CNIL (France) - SAN-2021-019 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
14:0014:00, 15 November 2021 diff hist −40‎ CNIL (France) - SAN-2021-019 ‎ →‎Facts Tag: Visual edit
13:5813:58, 15 November 2021 diff hist +22‎ CNIL (France) - SAN-2021-019 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
13:4813:48, 15 November 2021 diff hist +44‎ HDPA (Greece) - 7/2021 ‎No edit summary current Tag: Visual edit
13:4213:42, 15 November 2021 diff hist +381‎ HDPA (Greece) - 7/2021 ‎ I made some grammatical and syntax changes to ensure clarity ; I added the missing hyperlinks to the articles of the GDPR (make sure to say "Article 6(4) GDPR" and not "Article 6(4) of the GDPR ;-)) ; I erased the numbering in line with our Style Guidelines (NB. normally, numbering/bullet point should only be used for example to list names of parties or specific conditions ; here however, the points made by the HDPA were on different topics, such as the qualification of parties or lawfulness) Tag: Visual edit

10:1710:17, 10 November 2021 diff hist +16‎ CNPD (Luxembourg) - Délibération n° 36FR/2021 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
10:0210:02, 10 November 2021 diff hist +10‎ Personvernnemnda (Norway) - 2021-13 (20/01874) ‎ →‎Facts Tag: Visual edit
10:0110:01, 10 November 2021 diff hist +10‎ Personvernnemnda (Norway) - 2021-13 (20/01874) ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
09:4409:44, 10 November 2021 diff hist +10‎ Personvernnemnda (Norway) - 2021-13 (20/01874) ‎ Great summary! Just simplified or corrected the language here and there. Also added references to the GDPR when missing (you referenced several articles without adding "GDPR" after them). I defined the name of the parties and harmonised them throughout the text (the Norwegian DPA --> Datatilsynet ; the company running the restaurant --> the Company). Tag: Visual edit
09:4209:42, 10 November 2021 diff hist +430‎ Personvernnemnda (Norway) - 2021-13 (20/01874) ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
09:2509:25, 10 November 2021 diff hist −16‎ CNPD (Luxembourg) - Délibération n° 36FR/2021 ‎ →‎Holding Tag: Visual edit
09:2109:21, 10 November 2021 diff hist +72‎ CNPD (Luxembourg) - Délibération n° 36FR/2021 ‎ →‎Facts Tag: Visual edit
09:1809:18, 10 November 2021 diff hist +366‎ CNPD (Luxembourg) - Délibération n° 36FR/2021 ‎ Great case-summary! I had to shorten the small summary to comply with maximum of words. I streamlined the layout and style in accordance with our guidelines (no 'underline'; no "..."; etc; Not "Article 39.2 GDPR" but "Article 39(2) GDPR"). I added internal hyperlinks and corrected the syntax where necessary. I also changed and harmonized references to the DPA by references to the CNPD after defining it; and references to Company A to "the Company" after defining it. Tag: Visual edit

12:3712:37, 4 November 2021 diff hist +24,483‎ N CNPD (Luxembourg) - Délibération n°37FR/2021 ‎ Created page with "{{DPAdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Luxembourg |DPA-BG-Color= |DPAlogo=LogoLU.png |DPA_Abbrevation=CNPD (Luxembourg) |DPA_With_Country=CNPD (Luxembourg) |Case_Number_Name=37FR/20..." Tag: submission [1.0]
10:2410:24, 4 November 2021 diff hist +90‎ Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - 6132/151/19 ‎ →‎Facts current Tag: Visual edit
10:1810:18, 4 November 2021 diff hist +13,979‎ N Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - 6132/151/19 ‎ Created page with "{{DPAdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Finland |DPA-BG-Color= |DPAlogo=LogoFI.png |DPA_Abbrevation=Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) |DPA_With_Country=Tietosuojavaltuutetun to..." Tag: submission [1.0]

15:3415:34, 2 November 2021 diff hist −2‎ Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - 6745/163/18 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit: Switched
15:3315:33, 2 November 2021 diff hist +255‎ Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - 6745/163/18 ‎ →‎Facts Tag: Visual edit
15:2815:28, 2 November 2021 diff hist +26,518‎ N Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - 6745/163/18 ‎ Created page with "{{DPAdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Finland |DPA-BG-Color= |DPAlogo=LogoFI.png |DPA_Abbrevation=Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) |DPA_With_Country=Tietosuojavaltuutetun to..." Tag: submission [1.0]
14:0214:02, 2 November 2021 diff hist +159‎ APD/GBA (Belgium) - 117/2021 ‎ Very nice summary! I added some references to the GDPR Articles, shortened or corrected the syntax of some sentences. Normally, we don't use 'bold' in case-summaries (only in the Newsletter). Therefore, I reformatted the sentences that were in bold. Tag: Visual edit
09:1309:13, 2 November 2021 diff hist +11‎ Upravno sodišče - TBD ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
09:1109:11, 2 November 2021 diff hist +179‎ Category:UPRS (Slovenia) ‎No edit summary
09:0909:09, 2 November 2021 diff hist +3‎ N Category:UPRS (Slovenia) ‎ Here you can find all decisions by the Administrative Court of Slovenia (''Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije / UPRS''). Category:Slovenian Court Decisions Tag: Visual edit
09:0109:01, 2 November 2021 diff hist −2‎ Datatilsynet (Norway) - 21/00480 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
09:0009:00, 2 November 2021 diff hist −106‎ Datatilsynet (Norway) - 21/00480 ‎ Brilliant summary! I made minor changes (mainly with respect to legal vocabulary (e.g. "imposed a fine on X" ; rather that "notified to X a fine"). I also deleted the sentence in the end regarding the possibility for an appeal as we usually do not talk about procedural rules (you may however indicate in the box whether an appeal has already filed or whether it is still unknown). Tag: Visual edit

10:0010:00, 28 October 2021 diff hist +2‎ Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2021-32-2067 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
09:5609:56, 28 October 2021 diff hist +18,005‎ N Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2021-32-2067 ‎ Created page with "{{DPAdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Denmark |DPA-BG-Color= |DPAlogo=LogoDK.png |DPA_Abbrevation=Datatilsynet (Denmark) |DPA_With_Country=Datatilsynet (Denmark) |Case_Number_Name=..." Tag: submission [1.0]
07:0707:07, 28 October 2021 diff hist +129‎ Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N ‎ →‎Holding current Tag: Visual edit
06:5706:57, 28 October 2021 diff hist −6‎ Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit

13:5213:52, 27 October 2021 diff hist +12‎ Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-31-4326 ‎ →‎Comment: bug with URL of original source because contains brackets []. I therefore put the link in the Comment section Tag: Visual edit
13:5113:51, 27 October 2021 diff hist −100‎ Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-31-4326 ‎No edit summary
13:5013:50, 27 October 2021 diff hist −2‎ Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-31-4326 ‎No edit summary
13:4813:48, 27 October 2021 diff hist +1‎ Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-31-4326 ‎No edit summary
13:3913:39, 27 October 2021 diff hist +188‎ CE - 431875 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
13:2413:24, 27 October 2021 diff hist +1,228‎ CE - 431875 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
08:2708:27, 27 October 2021 diff hist +2‎ Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-31-4326 ‎ Thank you for this great summary! I made minimal changes such as "reprimand" instead of "expressed criticism" (because in the end an order to bring the processing into compliance was issued, which is more than just expressing criticism). I corrected the syntax here and there, and added the correct hyperlinks ; in the future, you should refer to GDPR articles as "Article 32 GDPR", not as "Article 32 of the GDPR" or "Art. 32 GDPR" for the hyperlinks to be automatically created ;)) Tag: Visual edit
08:2308:23, 27 October 2021 diff hist +279‎ Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-31-4326 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
08:1508:15, 27 October 2021 diff hist +48‎ Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-31-4326 ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
08:1108:11, 27 October 2021 diff hist +145‎ Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2021-431-0125 ‎ →‎Facts current Tag: Visual edit
07:5707:57, 27 October 2021 diff hist +19‎ Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N ‎ →‎Facts Tag: Visual edit
07:5707:57, 27 October 2021 diff hist −4‎ Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
07:5607:56, 27 October 2021 diff hist −3‎ Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N ‎ →‎Holding Tag: Visual edit
07:5507:55, 27 October 2021 diff hist +102‎ Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N ‎ →‎Holding Tag: Visual edit
07:5107:51, 27 October 2021 diff hist +3‎ Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N ‎No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
07:4307:43, 27 October 2021 diff hist +123‎ Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N ‎ →‎Holding Tag: Visual edit
07:2507:25, 27 October 2021 diff hist +67‎ Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N ‎ →‎Facts Tag: Visual edit
07:2107:21, 27 October 2021 diff hist +371‎ Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N ‎ Thank you for this summary! I made minimal changes such as (i) changing a few words in the summary to make it shorter (it has to fit the Newsletter); (ii) took out the sub-headin in the "facts" section as they were not strictly necessary to understand the facts and procedural background; (iii) added a few lines in the facts to clarify the procedural background (such as, "the Belgian DPA appealed that decision before the Supreme Court"; (iv) fixed the meta data in the box. Tag: Visual edit
06:4406:44, 27 October 2021 diff hist +141‎ Category:Supreme Court (Belgium) ‎No edit summary current
06:4306:43, 27 October 2021 diff hist +3‎ N Category:Supreme Court (Belgium) ‎ Created page with "xxx"

15:3715:37, 19 October 2021 diff hist +141‎ Datatilsynet (Norway) - 20/01813 ‎ Great summary! I just made some minor syntax and grammatical changes to increase fluidity. Instead of using 'cf.' when referring to the relevant legal provisions, it is better to say "under" or "in accordance with" (the abbreviation cf. stands for the Latin word confer which means “compare"). Tag: Visual edit

User contributions for FD

22 December 2021

21 December 2021

20 December 2021

17 December 2021

16 December 2021

14 December 2021

13 December 2021

7 December 2021

6 December 2021

3 December 2021

2 December 2021

1 December 2021

30 November 2021

29 November 2021

26 November 2021

25 November 2021

24 November 2021

23 November 2021

22 November 2021

17 November 2021

15 November 2021

11 November 2021

10 November 2021

9 November 2021

4 November 2021

3 November 2021

2 November 2021

28 October 2021

27 October 2021

25 October 2021

21 October 2021

20 October 2021

19 October 2021

11 October 2021

7 October 2021

6 October 2021

5 October 2021

4 October 2021