2 November 2021
- 14:0214:02, 2 November 2021 diff hist +159 APD/GBA (Belgium) - 117/2021 Very nice summary! I added some references to the GDPR Articles, shortened or corrected the syntax of some sentences. Normally, we don't use 'bold' in case-summaries (only in the Newsletter). Therefore, I reformatted the sentences that were in bold. Tag: Visual edit
- 09:1309:13, 2 November 2021 diff hist +11 Upravno sodišče - TBD No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 09:1109:11, 2 November 2021 diff hist +179 Category:UPRS (Slovenia) No edit summary
- 09:0909:09, 2 November 2021 diff hist +3 N Category:UPRS (Slovenia) Here you can find all decisions by the Administrative Court of Slovenia (''Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije / UPRS''). Category:Slovenian Court Decisions Tag: Visual edit
- 09:0109:01, 2 November 2021 diff hist −2 Datatilsynet (Norway) - 21/00480 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 09:0009:00, 2 November 2021 diff hist −106 Datatilsynet (Norway) - 21/00480 Brilliant summary! I made minor changes (mainly with respect to legal vocabulary (e.g. "imposed a fine on X" ; rather that "notified to X a fine"). I also deleted the sentence in the end regarding the possibility for an appeal as we usually do not talk about procedural rules (you may however indicate in the box whether an appeal has already filed or whether it is still unknown). Tag: Visual edit
28 October 2021
- 10:0010:00, 28 October 2021 diff hist +2 Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2021-32-2067 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 09:5609:56, 28 October 2021 diff hist +18,005 N Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2021-32-2067 Created page with "{{DPAdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Denmark |DPA-BG-Color= |DPAlogo=LogoDK.png |DPA_Abbrevation=Datatilsynet (Denmark) |DPA_With_Country=Datatilsynet (Denmark) |Case_Number_Name=..." Tag: submission [1.0]
- 07:0707:07, 28 October 2021 diff hist +129 Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N →Holding current Tag: Visual edit
- 06:5706:57, 28 October 2021 diff hist −6 Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
27 October 2021
- 13:5213:52, 27 October 2021 diff hist +12 Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-31-4326 →Comment: bug with URL of original source because contains brackets []. I therefore put the link in the Comment section Tag: Visual edit
- 13:5113:51, 27 October 2021 diff hist −100 Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-31-4326 No edit summary
- 13:5013:50, 27 October 2021 diff hist −2 Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-31-4326 No edit summary
- 13:4813:48, 27 October 2021 diff hist +1 Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-31-4326 No edit summary
- 13:3913:39, 27 October 2021 diff hist +188 CE - 431875 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 13:2413:24, 27 October 2021 diff hist +1,228 CE - 431875 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 08:2708:27, 27 October 2021 diff hist +2 Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-31-4326 Thank you for this great summary! I made minimal changes such as "reprimand" instead of "expressed criticism" (because in the end an order to bring the processing into compliance was issued, which is more than just expressing criticism). I corrected the syntax here and there, and added the correct hyperlinks ; in the future, you should refer to GDPR articles as "Article 32 GDPR", not as "Article 32 of the GDPR" or "Art. 32 GDPR" for the hyperlinks to be automatically created ;)) Tag: Visual edit
- 08:2308:23, 27 October 2021 diff hist +279 Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-31-4326 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 08:1508:15, 27 October 2021 diff hist +48 Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-31-4326 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 08:1108:11, 27 October 2021 diff hist +145 Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2021-431-0125 →Facts current Tag: Visual edit
- 07:5707:57, 27 October 2021 diff hist +19 Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N →Facts Tag: Visual edit
- 07:5707:57, 27 October 2021 diff hist −4 Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 07:5607:56, 27 October 2021 diff hist −3 Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N →Holding Tag: Visual edit
- 07:5507:55, 27 October 2021 diff hist +102 Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N →Holding Tag: Visual edit
- 07:5107:51, 27 October 2021 diff hist +3 Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 07:4307:43, 27 October 2021 diff hist +123 Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N →Holding Tag: Visual edit
- 07:2507:25, 27 October 2021 diff hist +67 Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N →Facts Tag: Visual edit
- 07:2107:21, 27 October 2021 diff hist +371 Supreme Court - C.20.0323.N Thank you for this summary! I made minimal changes such as (i) changing a few words in the summary to make it shorter (it has to fit the Newsletter); (ii) took out the sub-headin in the "facts" section as they were not strictly necessary to understand the facts and procedural background; (iii) added a few lines in the facts to clarify the procedural background (such as, "the Belgian DPA appealed that decision before the Supreme Court"; (iv) fixed the meta data in the box. Tag: Visual edit
- 06:4406:44, 27 October 2021 diff hist +141 Category:Supreme Court (Belgium) No edit summary current
- 06:4306:43, 27 October 2021 diff hist +3 N Category:Supreme Court (Belgium) Created page with "xxx"
25 October 2021
- 08:5608:56, 25 October 2021 diff hist −72 Datatilsynet (Norway) - 20/02375 No edit summary
21 October 2021
- 07:4707:47, 21 October 2021 diff hist +191 TA Luxembourg - N° 46189 →Holding current Tag: Visual edit
- 07:4207:42, 21 October 2021 diff hist 0 TA Luxembourg - N° 46189 No edit summary
- 07:4207:42, 21 October 2021 diff hist +17 TA Luxembourg - N° 46189 No edit summary
- 07:4107:41, 21 October 2021 diff hist −11 TA Luxembourg - N° 46189 →Facts Tag: Visual edit
- 07:3407:34, 21 October 2021 diff hist +10 Court of Appeal of Brussels - 2019/AR/1006 No edit summary
- 07:3007:30, 21 October 2021 diff hist −46 Court of Appeal of Brussels - 2019/AR/1006 No edit summary
20 October 2021
- 10:4510:45, 20 October 2021 diff hist +48 TA Luxembourg - N° 46189 →Comment Tag: Visual edit
- 10:4110:41, 20 October 2021 diff hist +64 TA Luxembourg - N° 46189 →Comment Tag: Visual edit
- 10:3010:30, 20 October 2021 diff hist +1 Commissioner (Cyprus) - 1.17.001.007.270 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 10:2210:22, 20 October 2021 diff hist +252 Commissioner (Cyprus) - 1.17.001.007.270 →Facts Tag: Visual edit
- 10:1810:18, 20 October 2021 diff hist +65,648 N Commissioner (Cyprus) - 1.17.001.007.270 Created page with "{{DPAdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Cyprus |DPA-BG-Color=background-color:#ffffff; |DPAlogo=LogoCY.jpg |DPA_Abbrevation=Commissioner (Cyprus) |DPA_With_Country=Commissioner (Cypru..." Tag: submission [1.0]
- 09:1309:13, 20 October 2021 diff hist −1 TA Luxembourg - N° 46189 No edit summary
- 09:1309:13, 20 October 2021 diff hist +2 TA Luxembourg - N° 46189 No edit summary
- 09:1209:12, 20 October 2021 diff hist +6 TA Luxembourg - N° 46189 →Comment Tag: Visual edit
- 09:1209:12, 20 October 2021 diff hist −1 TA Luxembourg - N° 46189 →Comment Tag: Visual edit
- 09:1109:11, 20 October 2021 diff hist −82 TA Luxembourg - N° 46189 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 09:0909:09, 20 October 2021 diff hist +453 TA Luxembourg - N° 46189 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 08:5808:58, 20 October 2021 diff hist +45,677 N TA Luxembourg - N° 46189 Created page with "{{COURTdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Luxembourg |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo=Courts_logo1.png |Court_Abbrevation=TA Luxembourg |Court_With_Country=TA Luxembourg (Luxembourg) |Cas..." Tag: submission [1.0]
19 October 2021
- 15:3715:37, 19 October 2021 diff hist +141 Datatilsynet (Norway) - 20/01813 Great summary! I just made some minor syntax and grammatical changes to increase fluidity. Instead of using 'cf.' when referring to the relevant legal provisions, it is better to say "under" or "in accordance with" (the abbreviation cf. stands for the Latin word confer which means “compare"). Tag: Visual edit