Search results

basis: Art. 4 (1), (2), (7) and (8), Art. 5, Art. 44, Art. 46 (1) and (2) (c), Art. 51 (1), Art. 57 (1) (d) and (f), Art. 77 (1), Art. 80 (1) and Art. 93

particular in Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. f, Art. 24 Para. 1 sentence 1, Art. 25 Para. 1 and Para. 2 sentence 1, Art. 28 Para. 1 and Art. 89 Para. 1 sentence 2 (...). The

119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; §§ 1 Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 2, 18 Paragraph 1 and 24 Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette

GDPR has been rectified under § 24(6) DSG by the information given in that reply. The data subject replied that § 24(6) DSG does not apply on violations of

, OJ No. L 119 of 04.05.2016, p. 1; Section 1 (1) and (2) and Section 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

(Datenschutzgesetz - DSG) regulates certain procedural elements as a lex specialis for the DSB, like the details of the complaints procedure in § 24 DSG (see below)

GDPR), OJ No. L 119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; §§ 1, 18 Paragraph 1 and 24 Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

Paragraph 4 DSG §24 Paragraph 1 DSG §24 Paragraph 5 DSG §24 Paragraph 6 GDPR Art 17 B-VG Art. 133 today B-VG Art. 133 valid from January 1st, 2019 to May 24th,

Section 24 (1) DSG only involves the processing of personal data contrary to the provisions of the GDPR, § 1 or Article 2 1st main part of the DSG can be

L 119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; Section 1 (1), Section 4 (1), Section 18 (1) and Section 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette

complaint hearing, the bB (OZ 23 to W245 2252208-1), the BF1 (OZ 24 to W245 2252208-1) and BF2 (OZ 25 to W245 2252208-1) Observations. In these observations, the

Zl. W258 2226305-1 / 5E, which the relevant Senate agrees: "According to § 24 Paragraph 1 DSG, which according to § 34 Paragraph 5 DSG is to be applied

right to data protection of § 1 DSG in the scope of § 9 para. 1 DSG is effectively undermined, since due to the in § 9 para. 1 DSG standardized exclusion of

No. L 119 of May 4, 2016, p. 1; §§ 1, § 18 paragraph 1 and § 24 paragraph 1 and paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No.

violates the GDPR or Section 1 or Article 2, Chapter 1 DSG, whereby the complaint pursuant to Section 24 Para. 2 No. 1 DSG must contain the designation

B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §18 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 DSG §24 paragraph 8 GDPR Art51 Para GDPR Art57 Para.1 litf GDPR Art57 Para

Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG) sets a penalty of €50,000 for, inter alia, (1) intentionally obtaining illegal access to personal

GDPR), OJ. No. L 119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; §§ 1, 18 para. 1 as well as 24 para. 1 and para. 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

tense provisions of § 24 Para. 1 DSG and Art. 77 Para. 1 GDPR - "violates" and not "has violated" - as well as § 24 Para. 5 DSG, according to which a legitimate

Art133 Para.4 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 GDPR Art12 GDPR Art15 GDPR Art4 VwGVG §28 paragraph 2 WTBG 2017 §80 saying W101 2218962-1/10E IN THE

Para.4 DSG §1 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 GDPR Art17 GDPR Art4 GDPR Art5 GDPR Art58 GDPR Art6 VwGVG §28 paragraph 2 saying W101 2213581-1/5E IN

No. 120/2017 DSG Art No. 133/2009 DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid from January 1st, 2000 to December 31st, 2009 DSG Art. 2 § 24 today DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid from May

decision date 01/16/2023 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §1 DSG §24 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 DSG §7 GDPR Art4 GDPR Art5 GDPR Art6 VwGVG §28 paragraph

hereinafter: GDPR), OJ L 119, 4 May 2016, p. 1; Sections 1, 18 Para. 1 and 24 Para. 1 and 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

hereinafter: GDPR), OJ L 119, 4 May 2016, p. 1; Sections 1, 18 Para. 1 and 24 Para. 1 and 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

to December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from

violations (Art. 24 Para. 1 No. 1 BayDSG), but also with regard to the protection of the public institution K.-garten against vandalism (Art. 24 Para. 1 No. 2 BayDSG)

GDPR), OJ L 119 of 4 May 2016, p. 1; Sections 18 (1) and 24 (1), (2) item 5, (4) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

Section 1 Para. 1 Z 1 BWG (deposit business), Section 1 Para. 1 Z 2 BWG (Giro business ), Section 1 Para. 1 Z 5 BWG (custody business) and Section 1 Para

2 Para. 2 Letter d, 4 No. 1, 6 Para. 1 Letter e, 79 Para. 1 BayDSG Art. 24 Para. 1 No. 1 and No. 2, 28 Guiding principles: 1. Video surveillance of a municipal

Administrative Court. 3. Legal Assessment 3.1. To dismiss the complaint 3.1.1. In accordance with Art. 15 Para. 1 GDPR, the data subject has the right to request

according to To 1): € 1.200,00 To 2): € 300,00 To 3): € 300,00 . . . In total: € 1.800 To 1): 3 days To 2): 1 day To 3): 1 day ... In total: 5 days Ad 1): Art.

complainant. Specifically, the DSB cites Articles 5(1)(b) and (e), 9(2)(j), 89(1) GDPR and Section 7(1)(1) and (2)(1) GDPR. In particular, it follows from Article

standard AVG §38 B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §24 GDPR Art12 GDPR Art15 DSGVO Art15 Abs1 litc GDPR Art77 VwGVG §17 saying W214 2233132-1/13E I. ON BEHALF OF THE REPUBLIC

a legal point of view, it follows that D.1 The legal situation: D.1.1. infringement of Article 1(1) of the DSG 2000: A decision on this part of the complaint

secrecy (Section 1 (1) DSG) as follows The appeal is dismissed as unfounded. Legal basis: Article 51(1), Article 57(1)(f) and Article 77(1) of Regulation

basis: §§ 1 to 9 DSG 2000, BGBl. I No. 165/1999 as amended by BGBl. I No. 132/2015, as well as § 24 para. 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), BGBl. I No

108/19 § 18aF DSG MV, § 19aF DSG MV, § 20aF DSG MV, § 21aF DSG MV, § 22aF DSG MV, § 6 Abs 4 BDSG, § 37 EUV 2016/679, § 39 EUV 2016/679 tenor 1. The defendant's

the Data Protection Act (DSG), BGBl. 12(5)(a), Art. 55(1), Art. 56(1), Art. 57(1)(f), Art. 58(2)(c) and Art. 77 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (Data Protection

119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; § 1 paragraph 1 and 2, § 18 paragraph 1 and § 24 paragraph 1 and paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette

Gazette I No. 120/2017 DSG Art No. 133/2009 DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid from January 1st, 2000 to December 31st, 2009 DSG Art. 2 § 4 today DSG Art. 2 § 4 valid from

7 DSG 2000 in conjunction with § 69 (5) DSG b) Art. 62 Para. 1 No. 4 DSG 4) a) Section 52 para. 2 no. 4 DSG 2000 in conjunction with § 69 (5) DSG b) Art

Paragraph 24(1) and (1) and (2) of the B-VG. 5 DSG as amended, with the provisos that part 1. of the ruling concerning the data protection complaint of 1 February

personal data concerning you violates the GDPR or § 1 or Article 2 1st main part. Section 24 (2) DSG generally specifies how a complaint to the authority

Law §1 para 1 Data Protection Law §1 para 2 Data Protection Law §9 para 1 Media Law §1 no 6 Media Law §1 no 7 Media Law §1 Z8 lit c Law of Parties §1 para

as amended, in conjunction with §§ 1, 3 Paragraph 1 and TP 1 Federal Administrative Fees Ordinance 1983, BGBl No. 24 as amended (BVwAbgV), the applicant

protection authority of 24.1.2020; e-mail of the Austrian data protection authority of 31.1.2020; e-mail of the plaintiff of 31.1.2020) will be returned

Section 1 (1) DSG can therefore not be assumed (RS0130870). 3.2.1. On the legality of the publication of the BF's data in the app Art 6 para 1 GDPR contains

Section 1(2) of the StVO. 2 DSG and Art. 8 para. 2 ECHR and justify such an intervention.§ 98a para. 2 first sentence StVO 1960 therefore violates § 1 DSG

"§ 25.1 sentence 1 of the Data Protection Act"]. In accordance with Article 58.2 lit. c DSGVO in conjunction with Article 24.5, second sentence, DSG, the

party. II The Federal Administrative Court considered 1. the following facts have been established: 1.1 Since 3 April 2001, the complainant has been operating

2 lit. g and Art. 77 Para. §§ 1 Para. 1 and Para. 2, 18 Para. 1 as well as 24 Para. 1 and Para. 5 Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

Legal basis: Art. 5 para. 1 lit. a to f, Art. 6 para. 1 lit. c, Art. 51 para. 1, Art. 57 para. 1 lit. f and Art. 77 para. 1 of the Regulation ( EU) 2016/679

from Art. 77 Paragraph 1 GDPR or Section 24 Paragraph 1 and 5 DSG and, furthermore, the principle according to Section 25 Paragraph 1 VStG the official access

(ExplanatoryRV 2111 BlgNR 24. GP 11; Bollenberger in KBB5 § 907a Rz 1). § 907a para. 1 sentence 1 ABGB is dispositive law (ExplanatoryRV 2111 BlgNR 24. GP 13; Kietaibl/Ladler

4 line 16, Art. 12 para. 1, Art. 14 para. 1 to para. 5, Art. 15, Art. 51 para. 1, Art. 57 para. 1 lit. f and Art. 77 para. 1 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679

Gazette I no. 165/1999 as amended; Sections 1(1)(1) and (2), 2(1), 3(1)(1), (1a) and (2) and 4 of the Epidemics Act 1950 (hereinafter: EpiG), Federal Law Gazette

15 (3) sentence 1 of the GDPR (question 1). Is this also a specification or modification of the general right of access under Article 15(1) of the GDPR and

Österreichische Post AG Status: May 2018 1. who is fiJr responsible for handling your data? 1.1 Austrian Post AG, Rochusplatz 1, 1030 Vienna ("Post", "we", "us")

appeal is admissible; however, it is not justified. Legal assessment 1.1 Paragraph 1328a(1) of the ABGB states Anyone who unlawfully and culpably encroaches

to December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from

to December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 2 § 24 today DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid from

difference whether a breach of the GDPR or the § 1 DSG is objective. With regard to violations of § 1 DSG, there is no - 9 - express legal basis for the

the Data Protection Act (DSG), § 22 DSG, paragraph 8)., Practical commentary on the Data Protection Act (DSG), paragraph 22, DSG, paragraph 8 ). Since the

4.5.2016, p. 1; §§ 1 paragraph 1 and paragraph 2, 18 paragraph 1 as well as 24 paragraph 1 and paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law

subject has objected to its processing pursuant to Article 21(1) of the GDPR (Article 17(1)(a), (c)(1) and (d) of the GDPR). A request for erasure would therefore

No. 24/2018 DSG Art. 2 § 36 valid from May 25th, 2018 to May 24th, 2018 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 120/2017 DSG Art I No. 83/2013 DSG Art

No. 24/2018 DSG Art. 2 § 36 valid from May 25th, 2018 to May 24th, 2018 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 120/2017 DSG Art I No. 83/2013 DSG Art

December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from January 3, 1930 to June 30, 1934 DSG Art. 2 § 24 today DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid

achieves the objective.  Section 24 DSG Paragraphs 1 and 4 DSG: Complaint to the data protection authority Section 24. (1) Every data subject has the right

respondent is rejected. Legal basis: Section 1 Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 2, Section 22 Paragraph 4, Section 24 Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 5 as well as Section 30

paragraph 2, item 6, DSG 2000 in conjunction with Article 69, paragraph 5, DSG and Article 62, paragraph 1, item 4, DSG. 2 item 4 DSG 2000 in conjunction

may include. 3.3.1.2. The relevant provisions of the DSG article 1 (constitutional provision) fundamental right to data protection § 1. (1) Everyone has,

accordance with Article 77, GDPR in conjunction with Paragraph 24, DSG on February 24, 2023. 1.4. The data protection authority then initiated a complaint

to December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from

Section 7 (3) DSG was rejected in clause 1 and in clause 2 the information requested by the complainant ("request") was not granted. Regarding point 1, it was

success such that summary judgment ought to be granted pursuant to CPR 24.2. 10. CPR rule 24.2 provides that the court may give summary judgment against a claimant

paragraph 7, paragraph 3, DSG. Since neither the requirements of Section 7 Paragraph 1 DSG nor those of Section 7 Paragraph 2 Z 1 and Z 2 DSG are met, the planned

from 01/01/2014 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from 01.01.2014 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 51/2012 DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from 01

December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from January 3, 1930 to June 30, 1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from

Section 24 (5) second sentence DSG that the desired elimination of the unlawful state determined by the data protection authority in clause 1. The present

Union in Case C-807/21 on the request of the Berlin Court of Appeal. Reason 1 1. The party involved has a business license as an "address publisher and direct

Sections 1 (1) and (2), 9 (1) and 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act – DSG, Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; Articles 4, 5, 6, 57(1)(f)

substantive requirements, e.g. of § 24 para. 2 - 6 DSG (cf. Schweiger in Knyrim, DatKomm Art 77 DSGVO, K8 (as of 1.12.2018, rdb.at)). The DPA also does

his rights under Article 1 GDPR or § 1 DSG, Art. 5 DSGVO or § 37 DSG, Art. 12, 22 and 41 DSGVO and Art. 34 DSGVO or § 56 DSG has been violated. The complainant

GDPR), OJ No. L 119 of 04.05.2016, p. 1; Section 1 (1) and (2) and Section 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

with Art. 77 GDPR in conjunction with Section 24 DSG. Article 77, DSGVO in conjunction with Paragraph 24, DSG. In this context, the accused was specifically

enforced. Reason: 1.     The following facts relevant to the decision are established based on the evidence procedure carried out: 1.1. On April 24, 2023, Mr.

procedural requirements are also met. 3.3. To the point: 3.3.1. Legal position: 3.3.1.1. § Section 24 (1) and (4) of the FADP read as follows: Any data subject

Article 26.1 item 1 of the DSG, which is why the complainant had been granted the status of a public official under Article 26.3 of the DSG. cit. the complainant

OJ No. L 119 of May 4, 2016, p. 1; §§ 9, 18 paragraph 1 and 24 paragraph 1 and paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

to December 24, 1946 last amended by StGBl. No. 4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 2 § 24 today DSG Art. 2 § 24 valid from

Section 30 Paragraphs 1 and 2 DSGParagraph 30, paragraph one, and 2 DSG. According to § 30 para. 1 DSGParagraph 30, paragraph one, DSG, the data protection

(Data Protection Act - DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999, in the relevant version Federal Law Gazette I No. 24/2018 (DSG) contains - similar to

basis: Sections 1 (1), 18 (1) and 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; Art. 4 nos. 1 and 2, Art.

Para p. 1; Sections 18 (1) and 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; §§ 2 Z 14, 17 Para. 1 and Para

GDPR), OJ. No. L 119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; §§ 1, 6, 18 para. 1 as well as 24 para. 1 and para. 5 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999

16.12.2021 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §1 GDPR Art5 VwGVG §28 paragraph 3 sentence 2 saying W214 2242817-1/7E DECISION The Federal Administrative Court

applying the provisions of Section 1 (1) and (2) DSG, Art. 4 Z 7 Previous search term GDPR Next search term and Art. 6 Section 1 lit constitutionally guaranteed

of 4.5.2016, S 1; in conjunction with §§ 1 Paragraph 3 DSG, 4 Paragraph 6, 24 Paragraph 1 and Paragraph 5 of the Data Protection Act - DSG, Federal Law Gazette