Search results

‘Opinion 06/2014 on the notion of legitimate interests of the data controller under Article 7 of Directive 95/46/EC’ 844/14/EN WP 217, 9 April 2014, p. 30 (available

CJEU, C‑131/12, Google Spain, 13 May 2014, margin number 34 (available here). CJEU, C‑131/12, Google Spain, 13 May 2014, margin numbers 32 ff. (available

provisions of Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council<ref>Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of

50 GDPR, margin number 8 (C.H, Beck 2018, 2nd Edition). WP29, ‘Opinion 02/2014 on a referential for requirements for Binding Corporate Rules submitted to

Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - TSV/26/2020. The DPA's annual reports from 2014 (ongoing) are available on this page. Annual Report 2022 (in EN): https://tietosuoja

com/ctpdandalucia Procedural Law: Articles 50 - 58 https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2014/BOE-A-2014-7534-consolidado.pdf Decision Database: https://www.ctpdandalucia.e

Clinical Trials on Medicinal Products for Human Use (Regulation (EU) No 536/2014), which includes special provisions in cases of consent to participation

2018 Ετήσια έκθεση 2017 Ετήσια έκθεση 2016 Ετήσια έκθεση 2015 Ετήσια έκθεση 2014 Ετήσια έκθεση 2013 Ετήσια έκθεση 2012 Ετήσια έκθεση 2011 Ετήσια έκθεση 2010

Joined Cases C‑293/12 and C‑594/12, Digital Rights Ireland Ltd, 8 April 2014, margin number 29 (available here). References to "appropriateness" "can

Holoubek/Lienbacher, GRC-Kommentar, Article 16, marginal numbers 6 and 7 (MANZ 2014). See for example Article 23 GDPR See for example CJEU in C-311/18 - Schrems

number 46 (C.H. Beck 2020, 3rd Edition) CJEU, Case C131/12 Google Spain 13 May 2014 (available here). CJEU, Case C-230/14, ,Weltimmo, 1 October 2015, margin

University Press, 2018, 5th Edition). CJEU, Case C-131/12, Google Spain, 13 May 2014, margin numbers 71-72, 75, 92 (available here). Kamann, Braun in Ehmann,

4(1)(c) Directive 95/46/EC Article 2(b) Directive 95/46/EC Decided: 13.05.2014 Parties: Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) Google Inc. Google

See also, CJEU, Joined Cases C-141/12 and C-372/12, YS and Others, 17 July 2014, margin number 57 (available here). As the EDPB puts it, "Given the broad

Gutman, EU Procedural Law, locations 18058 -18065 (Oxford University Press 2014). Towfigh and Ulrich, in Sydow, Europäische Datenschutzgrundverordnung, Article

out “in the context of the activities” of that establishment" (CJEU, 13 May 2014, Google Spain, C-131/12 (available here); and CJEU, 1 October 2015, Weltimmo

vote majority, one vote against the proposal and three abstentions. In March 2014 the Plenary of the European Parliament has equally voted for the report with

On 11 December 2014, the Court decided the Rynes case. The decision concerns the interpretation of the processing of personal data using the operation

corresponding to the following periods, respectively, 4/2014, 5/2014 and from 07/25/2014 to 10/21/2014. The means of publication is, for the three incidents

particular articles 20 and following ; Considering the ordinance n ° 2014-1329 of November 6, 2014 relating to the remote deliberations of the administrative bodies

Determining the Criminal Background of Volunteers Working with Children (148/2014) We are aware of the law in place. In our operations, Section 5 of the Act

supplements to the insurance policy for the years 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and - the reasons for the years 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 sent to the plaintiff for the purpose

enactment of the Personal Data Act of 2000, which built on Directive EC/95/46. In 2014, human rights inspired by the ECHR was incorporated into the Constitution

of the original document or file containing the data (ECJ 17 July 2014, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2081). The concrete material form in which the data must be provided

June 2014, Specht and others, C-501/12 and others, EU:C:2014:2005, marginal 46 et seq.; judgment of 11 November 2014, Schmitzer, C-530/13, EU:C:2014:2359

judgment of the European Court of Justice of 14 July 2014, [YS and others], C-141/12 and C-372/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2081, the data protection authority had already

for Austria. It has replace the Datenschutzkommission (DSK) on 1 January 2014. It resides in Vienna and is in charge of all public and private entities

decision of 26 July 2016 - 8 B 2.15 - juris, and of 30 June 2014 - 8 B 94.13 - ZOV 2014, 174). 110 It follows from this that it cannot be concluded, undifferentiated

Defendant in the contract concluded between the parties in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 has made insurance number KV 232311989 and has suitable documents

Action Alliance Ltd, R (ex parte) v The Secretary of State for Transport in 2014. Nonetheless, it is important to note that whilst the HRA's constitutional

25 September 2014 is still in force and valid is multiple and manifestly incorrect. First, the Tartu Circuit Court certifies on 28.11.2014 Judgment 1-11-10084

with "post-traumatic depressive adjustment disorder with somatization." In 2014, the data subject filed a claim with the controller for occupational disability;

crime consisting of disclosure of the data. &#13; &#13; &#13; On 12 January 2014, using the payroll data that he had copied onto his personal USB, Mr Skelton

11, 2013 and April 30, 2014 and the "Confidentiality Rules" of December 20, 2013, of March 31 Google’s 2014, December 19, 2014, February 25, 2015, May

Judgement of 13 May 2014, Google Spain, C-131/12, EU:C:2014:317, para. 68; Judgement of 11 December 2014, Ryneš, C-212/13, EU:C:2014:2428, para. 29; Judgement

(VwGH January 26, 1993, 92/07/0071; VwSlg 15.618 A/2001; VwGH 20 March 2014, Ro 2014/07/0046; VfSlg 9538/1982; VwGH 20 May 2015, Ra 2015/10/0023; see also

12/02/2014 Mr. B.B.B .. The document informs that the claimant was a sole partner and POUSEN sole administrator between 03/12/2009 and 12/02/2014. As well

of the original document or file containing the data (ECJ 17 July 2014, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2081). The concrete material form in which the data must be provided

of 3 April 2014, [plaintiff] has been granted Dutch citizenship. The decision was presented to [claimant] during a ceremony on 27 May 2014. 2.5. By order

would not take a position on whether the conditions of Article 24 Act no. 44/2014, on scientific research in the field of health, should apply, regarding the

of a representative is out of the question (cf. BGH, Order of 16 December 2014 - KRB 47/13, NZKart 2015, 272, 275 et seq. [Silostellgebühren III]; decision

"single window" mechanism of the DP Regs (Section 3 infra). 6 CJEU, 13 May 2014, C-131/12, Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección

a possible breach of the provisions of articles 42.5 and 58.1 c) of Law 5/2014, of 04 of April, of Private security, related to video surveillance services

violated a provision in Spanish law, Article 48(1)(b) of the 2014 Telecommunications Law (Ley 9/2014 General de Telecomunicaciones). The fine was issued on this

As result of the ECJ decision in Digital Rights Ireland case from 8 April 2014 (joined cases C‑293/12 and C‑594/12), two cases have been brought before

findings of the report, however, it is important to notice that, on 6 January 2014, a replacement law (Dutch: de Wet basisregistratie personen) was enacted

from the Voorschotbank was taken over by Hoist at some point in 2014. - ix) At the end of 2014, [appellant] was admitted to the debt rescheduling scheme for

her network regarding her candidacy in the EU Parliamentary elections of 2014 and no one objected to that as well. She held that updating her peers of

claimed from the BADEXCUG capital solvency file with registration date March 2014, for an unpaid debt of XXX euros. Annexes to the claim provide these documents:

One of data subject's patients filed a complaint against data subject in 2014 for a lack of aftercare after an operation. This led, ultimately, to a procedure

value='2016' > 2016</option><option value='2015' > 2015</option><option value='2014' > 2014</option><option value='2013' > 2013</option><option value='2012' > 2012</option><option

legal person under section 202 of the national Information Society Code (917/2014). DPA considered the following legal questions: 1) Has the controller sent

within the framework of the Master IT Service Agreement concluded on 17 June 2014 between the defendant and the company incorporated under Indian law Z (hereinafter

de la CJUE du 13 mai 2014, Google Spain SL c. Agencia Española de proteccion de Datos (AEPD) et autres, C-131/12 ; ECLI : EU:C:2014:317, paragraphe 34 ;

(hereinafter the "Code"); GIVEN the Opinion of the Working Group Article 29 n. 6/2014 on the concept of legitimate interest of the data controller pursuant to

credit facility on 4 April 2014, which meant that the credit limit was reduced by € 500 per month, for the first time on 1 May 2014. 6.3. An overview submitted

legal person under section 202 of the national Information Society Code (917/2014). The controller was unable to confirm whether they had received the data

payment history data related to out-of-court debt collection between February 2014 and April 2017. Of the seven claims cited, only one exceeded the amount of

BGHZ 93, 96, 97 f. - DIMPLE, mwN; judgment of 10 April 2014 - I ZR 43/13, GRUR 2014, 1114 = WRP 2014, 1307 marginal no. 32 - nickel-free; judgment of 19 March

company's legitimate interest. In this regard, the DPA quoted ART29WP's 06/2014 Opinion: "In general, the more sensitive the information involved, the more

July 2014, TW responded to the appellants' allegation and stated that it had "now had an opportunity to review the many files". On 4 August 2014, the appellants'

claimed that notifying via the public notice board was standard practice since 2014 as well as notifying through a more direct means of communication (such as

was published in the Official Gazette of the Canary Islands on February 13, 2014, where general criteria for security procedures are established (Document

with seat in Hamburg operates a service center in Nuremberg. Since at least 2014, issues concerning the private life of employees have been comprehensively

06/2014 on the notion of legitimate interests, p. 37. 228WP29 Opinion 06/2014 on the notion of legitimate interests, p. 38. 229WP29 Opinion 06/2014 on

to the transparency obligations: in the EDPB’s view, 892 WP29 Opinion 06/2014 on the notion of legitimate interests, p. 16-17. 893 EDPB Guidelines on calculation

de la GranChamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union of May 13, 2014, in itsparagraphs 80 and 88, states the following:“(…) A data processing

from her. When the educational institution went bankrupt in the spring of 2014, a different party bought the bankruptcy estate and continued the operation

authority sued before the administrative court (cf. VwGH December 17, 2014, Ra 2014/03/0049; VwGH September 8, 2015 , Ra 2015/18/0134; etc.). The matter

personal data when the individual can be recognised (see CJEU 11 December 2014, Rynes, C-212/13, point 22 and CJEU, 14 February 2019, F.K., C-345/17). The

paragraph 46 of the judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 July 2014, Y.S., ECLI:EU:C:2014:2081. Although this judgment concerns the right of access to Article

obligation to retain personal data. Statement received from the applicant In 2014, the applicant purchased eyeglasses and sunglasses from the registrar's optician's

case it concerned emails a citizen sent to the mayor's office to complain in 2014. The mayor used these emails for his most recent election campaign. Can a

subject in question in public life [judgments of 13 May 2014, Google Spain and Google, C-131/12, EU:C:2014:317 , paragraph 81, as well as of 24 September 2019

(EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012

to as the "Code"); HAVING REGARD to the general provision no. 243 of 15/5/2014 containing the "Guidelines on the processing of personal data, also contained

November 29, issued by Chamber 2.3 of the Court Constitutional Sentence No. 213/2014, dated December 2, issued by the Section 3.5 of the Ilma. Provincial Court

applicable national law, Section 200 of the Information Society Code (917/2014), user's consent must be obtained prior to the sending of any marketing communication

plaintiff made a request for the erasure of her medical data from her file in 2014 and another request in 2017. Both were denied by the defendant. In 2018 however

data (hereinafter the“ Code ”); GIVEN the general provision n. 243 of 15/5/2014 containing the "Guidelines on the processing of personal data, also contained

represents. The Spanish Data Protection Agency, in this resolution, mentions the 2014 decision from the ECJ, making again clear the fact that the search engine

(provision no.508 of 30 December 2011 [Doc. web1873945 ], prov . n. 364 of 10 July 2014 [Doc. web n. 3352396 ); CONSIDERING, in the present case, that this assumption

by the Personal Data Protection Authority, with the no. 1620/2000 and 159/2014 decisions, b) the claim of the complainant about indirect disclosure of sensitive

recording of telephone conversations, it was established that EOS Matrix since 2014 has been using the functionality of recording telephone conversations with

the decision of the Federal Court of Justice of September 23, 2014 (VI ZR 358/13, GRUR 2014, 1228) and the transparency in the health care system required

Articles 20 et seq. thereof; Having regard to the ordinance n° 2014-1329 of November 6, 2014 relating to the remote deliberations of the administrative bodies

referred to as the "Code"); HAVING REGARD to General Provision no. 243 of 15/5/2014 containing the "Guidelines on the processing of personal data, also contained

the user appear. The Judgment of the Court of the European Union of May 13, 2014 declares the Next: Section 28: (...) “by exploring the Internet in an automated

rely on the decision of the Federal Court of Justice of 23.9.2014 (VI ZR 358/13, GRUR 2014, 1228) and the transparency in the health care system required

44. 7 Opinion 06/2014 on the concept of “legitimate interests of the data controller” in Article 7 of Directive 95/46/EC, 9 April 2014, Article 29 Data

the Guarantor and confirmed by the Court of Cassation (Cass. Civ. N.12834 / 2014) which, however, in the present case were not observed; CONSIDERING that

December 2017 loc. cit., juris, marginal 38; OVG Nds, judgement of 29 September 2014 - 11 LC 114/13 - juris, marginal 28 f.; Schild, in: BeckOK Datenschutzrecht

Forum Standardization 6 Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliamentary Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services

Judgment of December 11, 2014, case C-212/2013, in which we are going to stop. In the aforementioned Judgment of December 11, 2014, the CJEU makes the following

(cf, with reference to the handwritten signature, provision no. 243 of 15/5/2014 containing the "Guidelines on the processing of personal data, also contained

selected by the user. The European Union Court of Justice ruling of 13 May 2014, in paragraph 28, states that "when exploring the Internet in an automated

public life (see, to that effect, Judgment of 13 May 2014, Google Spain and Google, C-131/12, EU: C: 2014: 317, paragraph 81). " The tribunal will emphasize

the definition of SMEs in accordance with Regulation (EU) No. 651/2014 of On June 17, 2014, the Commission considered it proportionate to propose a penalty

of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 13 May 2014 in the Costeja case (C131/12, ECLI:EU:C:2014:317). He also bases his request on Articles 10 and

email. These medical reports have been sent by email without encryption since 2014. Although at some point the hospital began using Microsoft Outlook’s Transport