Search results

provisions of Article 64 of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure for Public Administrations, which in its paragraph (f) provides that

days computed from the day following the of the notification. Article 64.2.f) LPACAP - provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

be considered as a motion for resolution, as set out in the Article 64(2)(f) LPACAP. The procedure shall last a maximum of nine months from the date of

agreement to initiate the procedure. In this sense, the article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP - provision of which the complainant was informed in the agreement

no allegation has been received any by the claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP -provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

the same. Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common for Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP) -provision of which

in the article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

requirements provided for in articles 64.2 and 68 LPACAP. It cannot be ignored either that article 85 of the LPACAP -which contemplates the possibility of

no allegation has been received any by the claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP - provision of which the respondent was informed in the agreement

regarding it. Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP) - provision of which

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), being carried out by means of publication in the edictal notice board

sedeagpd.gob.es 2/12 in accordance with the provisions of articles 63 and 64 of the LPACAP, for the alleged violation of Article 5.1.c) of the RGPD, typified

63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, 2011, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter referred to as LPACAP), for

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), was collected on 12/23/2021 as stated in the acknowledgment of receipt

Common Administrative Procedure of Administrations Public (hereinafter, LPACAP), was collected on 10/06/2021 as stated in the acknowledgment of receipt

heading of this document. Furthermore, in accordance with Articles 64(2)(f) and 85 of the LPACAP, it is informs that, if he does not make representations within

established in Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

that he could access the content of the same voluntarily. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP - provision of which the respondent was informed in the agreement

claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP) -provision of which

38(4)(d) of that rule. NAME: instructor to D. E.E.E. and, as secretary, to Dª F.F.F., indicating that any of them may be challenged, where appropriate, in accordance

in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP) -provision of which

sedeagpd.gob.es 9/11 64.2(f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administration (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

has been no received any allegation by the claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP -provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

no allegation has been received any by the claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP -provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

established in Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

In Consequently, on April 2, 2023, for the purposes set forth in article 64.1 of the LOPDGDD, the Director of the Spanish Data Protection Agency agreed

Article 5.1.f) of the GDPR Article 5.1.f) “Principles relating to processing” of the GDPR establishes: "1. The personal data will be: (…) f) treated in

no allegation has been received any by the claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP -provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

article section 85 of the LPACAP. In consideration of the foregoing and in accordance with the provisions of article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP, the agreement to initiate

in theArticle 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Administrative ProcedureCommon of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).C / Jorge Juan

may be considered a resolution proposal, as established in article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. The procedure will have a maximum duration of nine months from the

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

Consequently, dated August 19, 2021, for the purposes provided in its article 64.2 of the LOPDGDD, the Director of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection agreed

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

out in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on Administrative Procedure Commonwealth of Independent States (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

gob.es 11/13 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

resolution, as established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of the LPACAP. In accordance with Article 85.1 of LPACAP, if the sanction to be imposed is a

the claimed party, in accordance with the provided in articles 63 and 64 of the LPACAP, for the alleged violation of article 6 of the GDPR, typified in article

proposal, as established in article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. In accordance with the provisions of article 85 of the LPACAP, in the event that the penalty to

in the article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure ofPublic Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).In accordance

proposal, as established in article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. In accordance with the provisions of article 85 of the LPACAP, in the event that the penalty to

sedeagpd.gob.es 5/7 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter te, LPACAP), for the alleged infringement of Article 5.1.f) of the GDPR, typified in the Article 83.5 of the

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

established in article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure ofthe Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).In accordance

the top of this document. Likewise, in accordance with articles 64.2.f) and 85 of the LPACAP, you are informed that, if it does not make allegations in time

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

set out in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on Administrative Procedure Commonwealth of Independent States (LPACAP). In accordance with Article

out in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on Administrative Procedure Commonwealth of Independent States (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

no allegation has been received any by the claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP - provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

verified that no allegation has been received some by the DGP. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP -provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

of the foregoing and in accordance with the provisions of article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP, the agreement to initiate PS / 00227/2020 is considered Pro- Resolution

Determining the amount of the penalty is an obligation imposed by article 64.2 of the LPACAP and then point out that “not only are the requirements mentioned,

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

out in Article 64.2(f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administration (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

2/7 with articles 64.2.f) and 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative of Public Administrations (LPACAP), by not carrying

in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in the article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of thePublic Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).C / Jorge Juan

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

Article 64 of Law 39/2015, of 1 October, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations, are applicable, which in section f) establishes

Consequently, dated June 17, 2021, for the purposes provided in its article 64.2 of the LOPDGDD, the Director of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection agreed

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

established in article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure ofthe Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).C / Jorge Juan

as set out in Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of 1 October, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administration (LPACAP). In accordance with

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

Page 11 11/14 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

for in Article 64(2)(f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administration (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

proposal of resolution, according to the established in the article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. The sanctioning procedure will have a maximum duration of nine months

this sense, article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (LPACAP) - provision of which

Article 64(2)(f) of the C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 14/16 LPACAP. In accordance with Article 85 of the LPACAP, if the sanction

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

article 5.1.f) of the GDPR. V Classification of the infringement of article 5.1.f) of the GDPR The aforementioned infringement of article 5.1.f) of the GDPR

in the article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

considered a proposal for resolution, as established in Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. The sanctioning procedure will have a maximum duration of nine months

articleArticle 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Administrative Procedure Co-common of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

Article 6(1)(f), the legitimate interests of the controller or of a third party; and (d) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(f), the legitimate

in the article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP) -provision of which