Search results

corresponding legal basis contained in Article 6(1)(a) GDPR, 6(1)(d) GDPR and 6(1)(e) GDPR respectively, and would require no additional correlation. The other

There is a slightly different concept of "explicit consent" in Articles 9(1)(a), 22(2)(c) and 49(1)(a) GDPR. See the commentary on Article 9(1)(a) GDPR for

consent under Article 6(4) GDPR and further processing for a compatible purpose under Article 6(4) GDPR. See the commentary on Article 6(4) GDPR for details

alike. This consent is not valid. If a controller relies on consent under Article 6(1)(a) or Article 9(2)(a) GDPR, data subjects can withdraw their consent

safeguards (see Article 32(1)(a) GDPR); Handling of personal data breaches (see Article 34(3)(a) GDPR); Changing purposes of data processing (Article 6(4)(e) GDPR);

reliance on Article 6(1)(f) GDPR or at least exercise the right to object under Article 21 GDPR. If the legal basis is Article 6(1)(f) GDPR (i.e. 'legitimate

provided for in Article 6(1)(a) GDPR or, as the case may be, Article 9(2)(a) GDPR, and consent is withdrawn according to Article 7(3) GDPR, data must be

legitimate interest that a controller must demonstrate under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, as any processing based on Article 6(1)(f) GDPR would otherwise be essentially

legitimate interest (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR) or (ii) the public interest (Article 6(1)(e) GDPR). Hence, data subjects may find themselves in a situation where

basis of Article 6(1)(c) GDPR (i.e. processing is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject) or Article 6(1)(e) GDPR

the GDPR (Article 3)’, 12 November 2019 (Version 2.1), p. 6 (available here). EDPB, ‘Guidelines 3/2018 on the territorial scope of the GDPR (Article 3)’

entities could claim a legitimate interest under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR for communication data for purposes that are even less serious. Such a legitimate interest

of such processing (see Article 5(1)(b) GDPR), the requirement to have a legitimate basis laid down by law (see Article 6(1) GDPR), the right to access and

Member States. Example: Article 6(1)(a) GDPR Example: Not Art. 6 Abs 1 Lit a GDPR or Article 6 GDPR or GDPR Article 6, Sec 1(a) Recitals are also not shortened

complying with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject, under Article 6(1)(c) GDPR. In line with the general objectives of the GDPR, as outlined

of data listed under Article 9(1) GDPR. There have been conflicting arguments as to whether Article 22(1) GDPR lays down a right or a general prohibition

which would be competent under Article 55(1) GDPR, as provided in Article 56 GDPR in connection with Article 60 GDPR. For more information see commentary

lead SA (“LSA”) (Article 65(1)(b) GDPR), and where a SA is not following an opinion of the EDPB (Article 6(1)(c) GDPR). Article 65(1)(a) GDPR addresses the

compliant with Articles 5 and 6 GDPR. According to Article 6 GDPR, when a controller did not rely on consent (Article 6(1)(a) GDPR), its processing should be

other two conditions of Article 6 (1) (f) of the GDPR are not met. (26) The second condition of Article 6 (1) (f) of the GDPR is that the processing of

been provided, where: (a) the processing is based on consent pursuant to point (a) of Article 6(1) or point (a) of Article 9(2) or on a contract pursuant to

provisions Article 4.11: Consent (definition) Article 4.12: Violation of personal data (definition) Article 5.2: Principle of accountability Article 6.1.a: Legal

provided in article 46.1 of the aforementioned Law. 940-0419 Mar Spain Martí Director of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd

consented to processing of his or her data (Art 7 (1) GDPR). This is equally true under Article 7(a) of the Directive 95/46, which required that the data

processing still needs to rely on a legal basis from Article 6(1) GDPR and comply with the principles enshrined in Article 5 GDPR. Additionally, the processing

Supervision: Article 6(1)(f), legitimate interest. For the special category personal data: About diagnosis: Article 6(1)(a), cf. Article 9(2)(a), consent

The heading of Article 6(1) and the wording “has given” in Article 6(1)(a) support this interpretation. It follows logically from Article 6 and Recital 40

this case under Article 6(1)(a) or 6(1)(c)? If Article 6(1)(a) applies, do the requirements for parental consent under Article 8 GDPR also apply? Did the

category personal data and thus requires a legal ground for processing as per Article 9(2) GDPR, in addition to Article 6(1). However, the Board were split in

with Article 57(1)(a) and (h) of the RGPD. Moreover, the restricted formation notes that Article 80 of the EPMR provides for the possibility for a person

against a controller (as defined under Article 4(7) GDPR) and a processor (as defined under Article 4(8) GDPR). As noted above, Article 79 GDPR imposes

investigated are not compliant with the consent requirements under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR when placing cookies. Following its investigation of 175 websites

personal data is consent (Article 6(1)(a) GDPR) given while registering to the newsletter. Article 8(1) GDPR establishes the age at which a minor can legally give

provisions of Article 5(1)(a), 5(1)(f), and Article 6(1)(a) GDPR) and €50 (for violating Article 58(1)(a), 58(1)(e) and Article 83(5)(e) GDPR). Thus, the

The Commissioner fined a doctor € 14,000 for publishing sensitive patient data on Instagram. Patient filed a complaint with the Commissioner because her

without a basis from Article 6. Therefore, the AEPD considered that there has been an infringement of Article 6.1, entailing a fine of €2000. Article 14 refers

DPA found a violation of the principle of lawfulness, fairness and transparency established in Article 5(1)(a) GDPR. Moreover, the DPA found a violation

contrary to GDPR, specifically, articles Articles 5(1)(a) and 6(1)(a) GDPR. Though the Hospital acknowledged that the form was not adapted to the new GDPR rules

as per Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. The DPA found that the analysis of large amounts of data to create customer profiles could not be based on Article 6(1)(f).

The DPA therefore held that the controller violated Article 6(1)(a) (jo Article 4(11) and Article 7(1)). Regarding the pre-ticked boxes for third-party cookies

with Article 6(1)(f) GDPR when no valid consent has been obtained? The OVG Saarlouis also dismissed the appeal of the plaintiff arguing as follows: 1) The

below is a machine translation of the original. Please refer to the Finnis original for more details. Assistant Data Protection Officer gave Finnkino a note

the board management of the DPA to issue a referral in order to open an ex officio investigation (Article 63(1) of the Law establishing the Belgian DPA)

respective data subject, therefore infringing Article 6(1)(a) GDPR. On 23 October 2019, a complaint was lodged before a court relating to the fact that the personal

requirements of Article 33 GDPR. Based on a data subject's complaint, the Romanian DPA started investigations into a dental practice and a collaborating

the privacy policy. Thus, Article 21(1) LSSI has not been complied with, as there is no consent according to Articles 6 and 7 GDPR. Serious infringements

recordings of a witness on a website an infringement of Article 6(1)(a) GDPR? Is placing cookies without consent when visiting a webpage and not having a "refusal

subjects infringes Article 6 (1) (a) GDPR. The AEPD fined the data processor in an amount of 4,000 Euro for the violation of Article 6 (1) (a) GDPR. Since the

Mr. A.A.A., with NIF ***NIF.1, for an infringement of article 6.1.a) of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5 of the RGPD and considered very serious a prescription

websites do not have a legitimate interest to store credit card data under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. On 6 September 2018, the CNIL issued a Recommendation on

ASSOCIATION *** ASSOCIATION. 1, with NIF G98925795, for an infringement of article 6.1.a) of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5 of the RGPD, a fine of 3,000 euros

fined a political party about €1000 (BGN 2000) for processing personal data without a legal ground as required by Article 6(1) GDPR, after hiring a handwriting

2022, A.A.A. (hereinafter, the claiming party) filed a claim with the Spanish Data Protection Agency. The claim is directed against XFERA MÓVILES, S.A. with

these messages. Is this a violation of Article 6(1)(a) GDPR? The AEPD held that this behaviour was a violation of Article 6(1)(a) GDPR and fined Vodafone €100

rely on Article 6(1)(a) GDPR. Secondly, the DPA recalled that, according to Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, processing of personal data on the basis of a legitimate

lack of valid consent under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR. Thus, it imposed VODAFONE a fine of EUR 75,000 under Article 83(5) GDPR, being indecisive whether there

for performance of a contract," and "necessary for compliance with a legal obligation," under Articles 6(1)(a), 6(1)(b), and 6(1)(c) GDPR respectively. The

and 48.1 of Law 39/2015 of 1 October, on the limitation of the infringement of article 6.1 of the RGPD typified in article 83.5 a) of the mentioned norm

MÓVILES, S.A. (MASMOVIL), with NIF A82528548, for an infringement of article 6.1.a) of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5.a) of the RGPD, a fine of 60

with the rules in Article 6 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation [1]. 1, letter a. Below is a more detailed review of the case and a justification for

accordance with Article 6 (1). 1, letter b, if the processing is necessary to comply with a legal obligation in accordance with Article 6 (1). 1, letter c,

company 's actions were a breach of Article 6(1) GDPR. Article 6(1) does not apply here because they failed to prove that they had a lawful basis for processing

infringed Articles 6.1 (a) and 5.1 (a) of the GDPR, in breach of Articles (a) and (a) of the GDPR¬, in accordance with Article 71 (1) (a) and (b) respectively

therefore breaching Article 6 GDPR, as well as Article 5(1)(b) GDPR. Thirdly, Article 30 GDPR stipulates that the controller must keep a register of processing

to note that only Article 6(1)(a) GDPR allows for such a derogation from Article 32. The other legal basis in Article 6 restricts a data subject’s „disposition

agreed to initiate a sanctioning procedure for the one claimed by the allegedinfringement of article 6.1.a), typified in article 83.5.a) of the RGPD.FIFTH:

ESPAÑA, S.A.U., with NIF A80907397, for the alleged violation of article 6.1. GDPR typified in article 83.5.a) of the aforementioned RGPD. 1. APPOINT Mr

for the alleged infringement of Article 13.1, in relation to Articles 6.1(a) and 8.1 of the RGPD and in relation to Article 7 of Organic Law 3/2018, on Data

taken place in accordance with Article 5 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation. 1, letter e, and Article 6, para. 1, cf. Article 4, point 11. The Danish Data

2. Infringement of art. 6.1. GDPR: APPLICATION /7 [Plaintiff] further bases its decision on an infringement of Article 6.1. GDPR, to know that the lawfulness

AEPD imposed a fine of € 6.000 for unlawful processing data from a public registry without a legal basis under Article 6 GDPR. A citizen filled a complaint

with Article 9(2)(a) GDPR and Article 6(1)(a) GDPR. Thus, the Danish DPA held that the processing was also not following the principles of Article 5(1)

his compliance with the principles of article 5 par. 1 of the GDPR. 5. Furthermore, Article 6 para. 1 of the GDPR provides, among other things, that the

Where a controller envisages a processing operation having several purposes and seeks to obtain the data subject's consent under Article 6(1)(a) of the

issued Canary Click with a warning and ordered them to bring URL 1 and their privacy policy in line with Article 6(1)(a) GDPR within a month. The AEPD also

data subject’s consent under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR, which in turn meets the conditions for consent laid out in Article 7 GDPR. The AEPD highlighted that this

adequacy, or in accordance with Article 46, Article 47 or Article 49 (1); the second and second subparagraphs of paragraph 1, the indication of the appropriate

Protection Directive (95/46/EC), which contained a remarkably similar provision to the new Article 6(1)(f) of GDPR. This test breaks down into three parts, making

requirements of Article 6(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7 GDPR, which cannot be superseded by relying on Article 6(1)(b) GDPR? Is Article 5(1)(c) GDPR (data

as a legal basis under Article 6(1)(b) GDPR where only consent should be the relevant legal basis. The NO DPA also considers that data cannot be a commodity

interests under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. On the erasure obligations under Article 17 GDPR, the CJEU held that under Article 17(1)(d) GDPR SCHUFA will be under

Directive and Articles 6(1)(a) and 7 GDPR, in the lights of Article 4(11) and Recital 32 GDPR. Following this report, the GBA issued a decision confirming

that Wind Tre had violated the following articles of the GDPR: Articles 5(1), 5(2), 6(1)(a), 7, 12(1), 12(2), 24 and 25. It subsequently fined Wind Tre 16

processing by the defendant can only be Article 6 (1) sentence 1 lit e) DSGVO (see b) or Article 6 (1) sentence 1 lit f) DSGVO (see c), the requirements

laws (like § 151 GewO) and GDPR? Is a prediction of a political affiliation a "special category of data" under Article 9(1) GDPR? The decision of the DSB

Ordinance Article 5, paragraph Article 5 (2) 1, letter c and letter f., Article 5, paragraph Article 6 (1) (a) Article 32 (1), (1), (33) 1 and 35, para. 1. Below

rely on Article 6(1)(b) GDPR in the context of its offering of the Facebook Terms of Service, and to include an infringement of Article 6(1) GDPR” (Para

violates §§ 307 para. 1, para. 2 no.1 in connection with Art. 6 para. 1 sentence 1 DSGVO. Art. 6 para. 1 sentence 1 DSGVO and against § 1 UKlaG in conjunction

as a 'legitimate interest' pursued by Meta pursuant to Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. Lastly, the CJEU noted that the fact that Article 6(1)(a) and Article 9(2)(a)

decryption, a defendant's smartcard and corresponding software are required as well as a receiver such as a receiver or a CI-Plus module together with a compatible

with the provisions of Article 6(1)(c), Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, or both provisions? 2.     Does the answer to Question 1 mean: a)      that the person whose

compliance with the principles of Article 5 GDPR and that they could be based on the legal basis of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. The BVwG ruled that the principle

legitimate interests under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, they must still comply with data protection principles under Article 5 GDPR. In Croatia, many employers

Bobek is also of the opinion that Article 6(1)(c) GDPR and Article 6(3) GDPR do not preclude national rules from laying down, without any limit in time

breached Article 6(1)(f) GDPR for lack of legal basis, Article 21 for lack of considering an objection, Article 13 for lack of information and Article 24 for

DPC decisions, Meta shifted its legal basis from Article 6(1)(b) GDPR (contract) to Article 6(1)(f) GDPR (legitimate interest) for most of its processing

consent, in line with Article 6(1)(a) GDPR. The Court recalled that Article 31 of the Croatian Law on the Implementation of the GDPR stipulates that the

9(1) GDPR. The preliminary questions concern the issue whether the existence of a legal obligation – Article 6(1)(c) GDPR – or a public interest – Article

controllers to have breached Article 6(1)(a) GDPR, Article 9(1) GDPR, as well as Article 12 and 13 GDPR for having unlawfully contacted a data subject after the

breaching Article 6(1) GDPR, and required the company to implement a policy for conducting credit ratings per Article 24 GDPR. A person lodged a complaint