Search results

(l) give advice on the processing operations referred to in Article 36(2); (m) encourage the drawing up of codes of conduct pursuant to Article 40(1) and

section! You can help us by filling in this section! The Hamburg DPA fined H&M Hennes & Mauritz Online Shop A.B. & Co KG. in October 2020 an amount of 35

guidelines, recommendations and best practices referred to in points (e) and (f); (m) issue guidelines, recommendations and best practices in accordance with point

authority the results of verifications of the measures referred to in point (j); (m) the mechanisms for reporting to the competent supervisory authority any legal

Article 21 GDPR, margin number 8 (C.H. Beck 2021, 39th Edition). LG Frankfurt a. M., 20 December 2018, 2/5 O 151/18, (available here). Herbst, in Kühling, Buchner

2019, 1st edition) ECHR, Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, 2009, §§ 114-115; M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], 2011, §§ 301-304 and 319; Hirsi Jamaa and

personal data. Case Law: In C-708/18 - TK v Asociaţia de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA the CJEU had to provide guidance on how to assess whether processing

audit. The ICO is the best-funded DPA in Europe with a total budget of €61m in 2019, according to a Brave study. The ICO had 680 staff in 2019, far outnumbering

6 practice. However, the European Court of Justice has in the judgment M.I.C.M. from 2021 and in the judgment Breyer struck provided that dynamic IP addresses

with far too little funding for the caseload it has. The current budget is 25M euro and 180 FTE employed. Independent analysis by KPMG concludes it requires

visiting the Website can will constitute personal data. Justices Breyer and M.I.C.M. provides support for the assessment that dynamic IP addresses i all cases

be issued, Art. 33 Para. 1 M 158/10 -, resolution of September 14, 2012 - 1 M 94/12 - and resolution of October 25, 2012 - 1 M 103/12 -, each juris). The

17 practice. However, the European Court of Justice has in the judgment M.I.C.M. from 2021 and in the judgment Breyer struck provided that dynamic IP addresses

i practice. However, the European Court of Justice has in the judgment M.I.C.M. from 2021 and in the judgment Breyer struck provided that dynamic IP addresses

lawsuits became PEIRAIOS LEASING M.A.E. Therefore, the Hellenic DPA considered the controller to be PEIRAIOS LEASING M.A.E., and considered both complaints

o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]|| function(){ (i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)

its registered office at [place of business] , defendant, attorney at law M.M.C. van Graafeiland in The Hague. The parties will hereinafter be referred

official authority was not transferred to the defendant (cf. LG Frankfurt a.M., judgment of 20 December 2018 - 2/5 O 151/18 - NZI 2019, 342). However, the

Brussels Court of Appeal on 16 September 2020 by: M. BOSMANS - President-in-Office of the Council A-M. WHITETERSRaadsheer , O. DUGARDYN Alternate Counsellor

contact the ***TELEPHONE number from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. which I do not do, because I receive it at 7:04 p.m. When I arrive at my home, I try to enter

President M.V. Polak as chairman and councilors C.E. du Perron, M.J. Kroeze, H. M. Wattendorff and G. C. Makkink, and pronounced in public by Counsel H.M. Wattendorff

protection violations in H&M's service centre 01.10.2020 - H&M In the case of the monitoring of several hundred employees of the H&M service centre in Nuremberg

Content Management & Consulting (M.I.C.M.) Limited Proximus NV Telenet BVBA Scarlet Belgium NV Case Number/Name: C-597/19 M.I.C.M. European Case Law Identifier:

tribunal has deemed the d between tta m e n to d e i d a ti p e rs o n a li d e g li a d e re n ti a l sris te m a M evalaute because validated by consent

pour attributaire M. [...]. Par un courrier électronique du 2 octobre 2019, la délégation de contrôle a notifié le contrôle en ligne à M. [...], après l’avoir

appropriate technical measures to guarantee security processing. 17. The counsel for M. [...] replies that his client had no desire to allow free access to these

protection law, in particular the data protection and state hospital law (DSG M-V, LKHG M-V). He also referred to an article he wrote about the GDPR in the magazine

OF THE NETHERLANDS, established in The Hague , defendant, attorney at law M.M.C. van Graafeiland, The Hague. The parties will hereinafter be referred to

considered proven facts PROVEN FACTS FIRST: On February 18, 2018 at 6:27 p.m. an email was sent from the address ecooltra@email.ecooltra.com to ***USER

a certain period of time has elapsed as a human rights concern (see ECHR, M. L. and W. W. v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 2018, nos. 60798/10 and 65599/10

different codes of conducts under Article 41 GDPR (redacted as "code S***", code M*** and code U***"). These codes had been approved by the DSB under Article

ECLI:NL:HR:2016:1483, NJ 2017/262 m.nt. S.D. Lindenbergh and J.S. Kortmann, Ars Aequi 2017, p. 41 ff. m.t. W.H. van Boom, JOR 2016/332 m.nt. M.M.C. of the Moosdijk and

appellant, Attorney at law: Mr. J.M. Molkenboer in Tilburg, by ING BANK N.V. , based in Amsterdam, Intimate, Attorney at law: Mr. I.M.C.A. Reinders Folmer, Amsterdam

its content. This state of affairs is confirmed by the explanations of Mrs. M. K., ZSO teacher, classroom teacher [...] (the protocol of acceptance of oral

Handels- und Betriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. and stored there. In the past, employees of XY Handels- und Betriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. had access to the image material

fine on Ms M. Z. conducting business activity under the name K., the President of the Office for Personal Data Protection establishing that Ms M. Z. conducting

appeal. Thus determined by C.H.M. van Altena, Chairman, and C.M. Wissels and C.C.W. Lange, Members, in the presence of M.H. Kuggeleijn-Jansen, Registrar

brief dated November 4th, 2020, the plaintiff brought an action before the M. District Court. This was given to the defendant on Delivered on December 10th

represented by its agents. Third Party is represented by its agents and M.J.M. Piels. Considerations Why doesn't the court grant the plaintiff's request

otto.m***@at.com If you have any questions or concerns about the processing of your personal data, please feel free to contact contact us: otto.m***@at

qualified as minor for the purposes of the statute of limitations in Article 74.m) of the LOPDGDD. FOURTH: On 16/06/2020, FUNDACION SINDROME 5P MENOS DE C.V

for the data prepared in connection with epidemiological measures, e.g. á m. data obtained by sampling for COVID-19. The data received by the epidemiologist

lawyers, - Zs. Biró-Tóth and M. Z. Fehér, representing the Hungarian government, in the capacity of attorney, - T. Machovičová, M. Smolek and J. Vláčil, representing

cloudflare.com/terms/ httos://www.cloudflare.com/resources/assets/slt31c6tev37/1 M 1 j5uuFDuLTYiZJJDPBag/bda8d591447971 b3df2bccf5aa4e0916/Customer OPA v,3 1

XXXX p.m. The complaint regarding XXXX was submitted via ERV at XXXX p.m. The complainant's complaint regarding XXXX was filed via ERV at XXXX p.m. The complaint

his family, mother L. V., father Ž. V., brother I.V. and common-law wife M.M., so he could not determine with certainty who ... at ... hours was driving

(further) prosecution is undesirable (a so-called policy dismissal). T he M arket h o w a t w a ck both respect the orm e le and the material obligation

Office for Personal Data Protection to perform his tasks, i.e. to consider Mr. M. K.'s complaint about irregularities in the processing of his personal data

Inspection Service, 6 January 2020 (Exhibit 53), pp. 99 ff. 86C. SANTOS , M. OUWENS , M. OTH, N. IELOVA, V. OCA, "Consent Management Platforms Under the GDPR:

installation and use of surveillance cameras (hereinafter the Cameras Law), M.B., May 31, 2007. 6 Decision 19/2020 regarding the consultation of the National

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense typified in article 72.1 m) of the LOPDGDD, to be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of the RGPD

mobile line was allegedly active with activity fraudulent since 2:52 p.m. until 7:22 p.m. on April 1, 2022. FUNDAMENTALS OF LAW Yo Competence In accordance

the complaint to the APO are as follows. On February 18, 2020, Ie p/loving [M. X] is terminated by the defendant [Y]. Before handing over your equipment

truth (cf. ECtHR decision of 27 June 2017, Satakunnan M a r k k i n a p ö r s s i O y k a i S a t a m e d i a O y k a t a F i n l a n d i a s § 165). Also

pharmacies via an Internet trading platform. 2. The plaintiff runs a pharmacy in M. . 3. The defendant is also a pharmacist and operates a pharmacy in O., which

motorway at a speed of 116 km/h was only 20 m away and thus less than 4/10 of half the speedometer value (58 m). The photograph taken by the police showed

profile (*** URL.2) the defendant exposed on 10/11/2018 from 12:01 a.m. to 2:49 p.m., the claimant's instance of 01/17/2018 containing name and surname

thisresolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 GDPR

entrusting by the Housing Community with its registered office in S., ul. (…), (…) M.G. conducting business activity under the business name “(…)”, ul. (…), processing

regulatory content in this respect (OLG Hamburg MMR 2015, 740 m. Hansen/Struwe; KG MMR 2020, 239 m. Anm. Heldt, Ls. 5; Hacker, ZfPW 2019, 148 (184); Moos, in:

Authority and the imposition of an administrative fine. By letter of 31. s.m. The City of Reykjavík requested more information and explanations regarding

there have been a number of incidents related to the Bank's EDB Central A.M.B.A's (hereafter BEC) IT system. The incidents have resulted in accidental

further sanctioning of Vodafone España by the AEPD pursuant to Article 72(1)(m). The AEPD does not specify the provision of Article 21 on which it bases its

Code 188607912 Consultation tel. (8 5) 212 7532, Monday to Thursday, 9 a.m. to 11 a.m. and 1pm to 3pm © Government of the Republic of Lithuania Data 2121 2021

or failing to provide access in violation of Article 58(1).” Article 72.1 (m) of Organic Law 3/2018 on the Protection of Personal Data on the Personal Data

Madrid was alerted to a possible information leak on Sept. 16, 2020, 6:20 p.m. • On September 17, a data copy is detected from the network drive did the

owner of the line telephone *** TELEPHONE. 2 on January 31, 2020 at 11:34:50 a.m., and specifically in its ownership since October 2, 2019. The investigated

controller). RESULT OF INVESTIGATION ACTIONS 1. Regarding the facts:  Around 2:30 p.m. on *** DATE.2, the SGNEC states that it received telephone communication regarding

suitable basis for a claim. 27a) 28 A right to information from Section 666 i. V. m. Section 675, Paragraph 1 of the German Civil Code (BGB) is out of the question

and aldermen of the municipality of Dongen (defendant) (Agents: mr. W.C.J.M. Dankers and [name of attorney] ). Introduction 1. In this judgment, the court

confirms the challenged statement. Thus established by mr. A.W.M. Bijloos, chairman, and G.T.J.M. Jurgens and mr. J.Th. Drop, members, in the presence of mr

operating room report or delivery record. l) The pathological anatomy report. m) The evolution and planning of nursing care. n) The therapeutic application

k) The operating room report or delivery record. l) The pathology report. m) The evolution and planning of nursing care. n) The therapeutic application

within ten days would be considered a violation pursuant to Article 72(1)(m) of the LOPDGDD, which would be sanctioned according to Article 58(2) GDPR

euros). Thus determined by J.E.M. Polak, chairman, and E.A. Minderhoud and E.J. Daalder, members, in the presence of M.A.E. Planken, registrar. The chairman

by whoever had been represented, but also because of having consulted the R.M. could have known that the claimant no longer held the administrator status

forward, the claimed). The claimant states that on June 19, 2020 at 7:55 p.m. hours received on his mobile a phone call made from the number *** TELEPHONE

resolution could lead to the commission of the offense considered in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which will be sanctioned, in accordance with art. 58.2 of

classified as very serious for the purposes of prescription in article 72.1.m) of the LOPDGDD, which is sanctioned in accordance with art. 58.2 of the GDPR

request for access was submitted on... via FAX to number... around the time... p.m., then by e-mail about the time..., and due to a missed connection, on... were

Lawyers: J.M. Brölmann and S.C.M.J.V.L. Kloppers in Utrecht, and 2 ABN AMRO Bank N.V, established at [place of business] , Attorney at law: Mr. C.M. Jakimowicz

ground. The area monitored in the K.-garten is rectangular in size of 60 m x 80 m. A total of ten cameras are installed there. Eight of them are permanently

Nineteen A of the Court of Appeal in Brussels 30jun2021 by M. BOSMANS Councilor dd. chair A.M. WITTERS Councilor O.DUGARDYN Deputy Councilor B. VANDERGUCHT

(respondent) from **** D***stadt, represented by R*** T*** Rechtsanwälte Ges.m.b.H. from **** B***, for violation of the right to deletion as a result of

2018, and that the last call was received on last August 21, 2019 at 7:08 p.m. from the calling line *** PHONE. 2. C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 -

Personal Data and Guarantee of Digital Rights (LOPDGDD) in its article 72.1 m), under the heading "Infringements considered to be very serious," he says:

the invitation of its President in a meeting on Tuesday 31.5.2022 at 10.00 a.m., in order to examine the case referred to in the present history. The President

Internet platform, TopfSecret Lower court: VG Munich, decision of 16.09.2019 - M 32 SN 19.2574 Place where it was found: BeckRS 2020, 6798   Tenor I. The appeal

with further information to ensure fair and transparent processing, e.g. á m. how long personal information will be stored or, if that is not possible,

hearing; reserves any further decision. This decision was made by J.F.M. Pols, M. van Ham and R.J. Voorink and was pronounced in public on 10 September

on March 31, 2023 I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court, judged by Mag. Bernhard SCHILDBERGER, LL.M. as chairperson and

Decided: 17.02.2021 Published: 03.06.2021 Fine: €15,000 EUR Parties: Purple Sea M.I.K.E. National Case Number/Name: 23/2021 European Case Law Identifier: n/a

certificate is NEGATIVE, It has been provided as a reason for the denial: “M. Tax Crime ”, for their transfer and that could request a review before the

ABN AMRO BANK N.V., established in Amsterdam, Intimate, Attorney at law: M.J.M.T. Keulaerds, The Hague. 1 Procedure The parties are hereinafter referred

and 15 hours he was working, paying its ordinary working day from 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. a) The claimant states that she received the complaint from the DGT,

subject of this claim, it was created on February 4, 2022 at 10:39 p.m. Spanish time (8:39 p.m. UTC time ), and was available until at least April 22, 2022. Both

only the date is seen in the first 08/20/2019 screen and another at 11:22 p.m. At the top is the line *** TELEPHONE. 1, parts of the conversation indicated

will be incorporated into the processing system owned by the company HOLIDAY M. OESTE, S.L, with registered office at Calle Rozabella, nº 6, 28290, Las Rozas

van de GBA stelt de verweerder dat de interne beslissing van de verweerder (m.b.t. het overschakelen van Microsoft tools naar een intern ontwikkelde oplossing)

on the same basis. In the decision of the European Court of Human Rights, M.L. and W.W. vs Germany (issued on June 28, 2018), it has been stated that in