Search results

that he could access the content of the same voluntarily. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP - provision of which the respondent was informed in the agreement

claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP) -provision of which

38(4)(d) of that rule. NAME: instructor to D. E.E.E. and, as secretary, to Dª F.F.F., indicating that any of them may be challenged, where appropriate, in accordance

in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP) -provision of which

sedeagpd.gob.es 9/11 64.2(f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administration (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

has been no received any allegation by the claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP -provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

no allegation has been received any by the claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP -provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

established in Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

In Consequently, on April 2, 2023, for the purposes set forth in article 64.1 of the LOPDGDD, the Director of the Spanish Data Protection Agency agreed

Article 5.1.f) of the GDPR Article 5.1.f) “Principles relating to processing” of the GDPR establishes: "1. The personal data will be: (…) f) treated in

no allegation has been received any by the claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP -provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

article section 85 of the LPACAP. In consideration of the foregoing and in accordance with the provisions of article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP, the agreement to initiate

in theArticle 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Administrative ProcedureCommon of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).C / Jorge Juan

may be considered a resolution proposal, as established in article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. The procedure will have a maximum duration of nine months from the

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

Consequently, dated August 19, 2021, for the purposes provided in its article 64.2 of the LOPDGDD, the Director of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection agreed

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

out in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on Administrative Procedure Commonwealth of Independent States (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

gob.es 11/13 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

resolution, as established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of the LPACAP. In accordance with Article 85.1 of LPACAP, if the sanction to be imposed is a

proposal, as established in article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. In accordance with the provisions of article 85 of the LPACAP, in the event that the penalty to

the claimed party, in accordance with the provided in articles 63 and 64 of the LPACAP, for the alleged violation of article 6 of the GDPR, typified in article

in the article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure ofPublic Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).In accordance

proposal, as established in article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. In accordance with the provisions of article 85 of the LPACAP, in the event that the penalty to

sedeagpd.gob.es 5/7 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter te, LPACAP), for the alleged infringement of Article 5.1.f) of the GDPR, typified in the Article 83.5 of the

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

established in article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure ofthe Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).In accordance

the top of this document. Likewise, in accordance with articles 64.2.f) and 85 of the LPACAP, you are informed that, if it does not make allegations in time

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

set out in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on Administrative Procedure Commonwealth of Independent States (LPACAP). In accordance with Article

out in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on Administrative Procedure Commonwealth of Independent States (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

no allegation has been received any by the claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP - provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

verified that no allegation has been received some by the DGP. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP -provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

of the foregoing and in accordance with the provisions of article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP, the agreement to initiate PS / 00227/2020 is considered Pro- Resolution

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

out in Article 64.2(f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administration (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

Determining the amount of the penalty is an obligation imposed by article 64.2 of the LPACAP and then point out that “not only are the requirements mentioned,

2/7 with articles 64.2.f) and 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative of Public Administrations (LPACAP), by not carrying

in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in the article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of thePublic Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).C / Jorge Juan

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

Article 64 of Law 39/2015, of 1 October, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations, are applicable, which in section f) establishes

Consequently, dated June 17, 2021, for the purposes provided in its article 64.2 of the LOPDGDD, the Director of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection agreed

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

established in article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure ofthe Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).C / Jorge Juan

as set out in Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of 1 October, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administration (LPACAP). In accordance with

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

Page 11 11/14 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

proposal of resolution, according to the established in the article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. The sanctioning procedure will have a maximum duration of nine months

for in Article 64(2)(f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administration (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

this sense, article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (LPACAP) - provision of which

Article 64(2)(f) of the C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 14/16 LPACAP. In accordance with Article 85 of the LPACAP, if the sanction

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

article 5.1.f) of the GDPR. V Classification of the infringement of article 5.1.f) of the GDPR The aforementioned infringement of article 5.1.f) of the GDPR

in the article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

considered a proposal for resolution, as established in Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. The sanctioning procedure will have a maximum duration of nine months

articleArticle 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Administrative Procedure Co-common of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

in the article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

Article 6(1)(f), the legitimate interests of the controller or of a third party; and (d) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(f), the legitimate

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP) -provision of which

in articleass 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Administrative Procedure Co-of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).In accordance

in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of 1 October, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 10/18 Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP -provision of which COOLTRA was informed in the agreement to open

established in article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure ofthe Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).In accordance

in the Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

alleged infringement of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR. Does the action of the defendant constitute a violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR? Considering the evidence available

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

in the article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure ofPublic Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).In accordance

conformity with articles 64.2.f) and 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative of Public Administrations (LPACAP), by not carrying

the claimed party, in accordance with the provisions of articles 63 and 64 of LPACAP, for the alleged violation of the article 5.1.c) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679

of articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). C / Jorge

indicated in Article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations, which in its section f) establishes

accordance with Articles 64.2.f) and 85 of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on Procedure Common Administration of Public Administration (LPACAP), as it does not allegations

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

contrary to what the Proposal for a Resol- tion, neither Article 64 nor Article 85 of the LPACAP establishes that in the At the beginning, the specific amount