Search results

of Justice (judgment of the Federal Court of Justice in 23.06.2009 - VI ZR 196/08, MMR 2009, 608, is today only based on processing for "journalistic purposes"

Here you can find all Court and DPA decisions from 2009.

according to European case law (on this: ECJ, Judgment of 10 September 2009 - C-97/08 - EuZW 2009, 816, 821 [Akzo Nobel and others v. Commission], para. 54 et seq

purposes are achieved (see in this sense: Rijkeboer judgment of 7 May 2009, C‑553/07, EU:C:2009:293, paragraph 33).55 This interpretation is secondly in accordance

appeared that on 24 August 2009 [appellant] transferred an amount of € 34,000 to her savings account, that on 11 September 2009 she transferred an amount

open up the HDPA's jurisdiction (Article 5 Law 2472/1997, HDPA Opinions 4/2009, 6/2013, HDPA Decision 8/2019). Furthermore, the HDPA held that the complainant's

Gazette No. 185/1983 as amended; §§ 1 et seq. of the 2009 Medicines Operating Regulations (AMBO 2009), Federal Law Gazette II No. 324/2008 as amended; §

[appellant] tried to open a new bank account with ING in 2009. ING summoned her by letter of 17 August 2009 to pay the outstanding balance of € 5,401.22 at that

HDPA also indicated there is a specific national legal framework (Law 3758/2009) regulating information related to bank clients and debtors. Share your comments

al. v. Finland (10.2.2009, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0210JUD000351402), judgment Egeland and Hanseid v. Norway (16.4.2009, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0416JUD003443804), Grand

Opinion 5/2009 on social networks of Group 29. In this respect, the Disputes Chamber states that the defendant cannot simply rely on an opinion of 2009, long

been amended by Directive 2009/136 / EC (Directive 2009/136 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2009 on universal service and

Protection Regulation, Art. 15, 1; see also the judgment of the ECJ of May 7, 2009, C-553/07 margin nos. 49 to 51). According to the jurisprudence of the Administrative

Article 17 (10) of Law 2190/1994, as replaced by Article 13 (1) of Law 3801/2009 and paragraph 11 of that article, provides that the results of the (written)

manager of a general partnership, as already on 06-02-2009 the private amendment agreement of 29-01-2009 had been published in the books of the Court of First

search engine, these articles are listed among the top search results. In 2009, the complainant asked the magazine to remove the articles, and following

background and the rationale for this position, one refers to Ot.prp.nr.108 (2008–2009) «On the Act on the processing of information in the police and the prosecuting

the version resulting from Directive 2009/136 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 25 November 2009) - hereinafter referred to only as

(hereinafter the "ePrivacy Directive"); HAVING REGARD to Directive 2009/136 / EC of 25 November 2009, of the European Parliament and of the Council, amending Directive

by the Supreme Administrative Court in the so-called Veropörssi case, KHO 2009:82. Deviation from the established interpretation practice is not justified