Search results

processing via means of video surveillance, especially under HDPA Order 1/2011 on the use of video surveillance systems for the purposes of the protection

GDPR personal data is involved. Second, as the data subject was sentenced in 2011 and had served their prison time by 2016, the search results relate to old

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lg. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

by way of a step action regarding all contribution increases in the years 2011 - 2016, finding that all contribution increases are ineffective are and payment

DE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-subchapVI- sec1881.htm and https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-

this could not be inferred from the wording of the provision. The Directive 2011/24/EU also speaks against such a surrender of entire documents: its Article

immediately received a copy of the inspection report (document B.11). On 27 July 2011, the appellant submitted her defences (documents C.1 and C.2). On 17 September

sentence in full and that the arrest warrant had ceased to be valid since April 2011. Consequently, the information was no longer necessary for the purposes for

18, 2002 - VII ZR 260/01, NJW 2002, 2952, 2953 and from 29.03.2011 - VI ZR 117/10, NJW 2011, 1815 para. 8 each with further reference; OLG Köln, VersR 2020

the supplements to the insurance policy and the supplements from the years 2011 to 2020. Despite careful research, it was not possible to determine where

Authorization No. 2600/2011, which refers precisely to the General Population and Housing Census operation. 298. Authorization No. 2600/2011 was never subject

Inspection Service to Recommendation 1Recommendation of initiative n° 03/2011 of 25 May 2011 on the copying of identity cards as well as their use and electronic

as the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

No 1049/2001 Decided: 23.11.2011 Parties: Case Number/Name: T-82/09. Dennekamp I European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2011:688 Reference from: Language:

2001/29 Directive 2004/48 Directive 95/46 Directive 2002/58 Decided: 24.11.2011 Parties: Scarlet Extended SA Société belge des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs

free movement of such data, PbEG 1995, L 281/31. 4 HR 9 September 2011, ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BQ8097 (Santander), para. 3.3. 5 Parliamentary Papers II 2017/18

DE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-subchapVI- sec1881.htm and https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lg. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

DE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-subchapVI- sec1881.htm and https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-

2016/679 (hereafter GDPR) and the way in which the Authority’s Directive 1/2011 on video surveillance systems should be interpreted in the light of the Regulation