Search results

explained that WP29 and EDPB have assisted ESMA and IOSCO with the drafting of the AA during the last two years (six rounds of comments) in order to ensure that

6193-22 15. AA's complaints to the Swedish Privacy Agency have not led to those of him the requested measures. It follows from the foregoing that AA has the

rejected AA's appeal there. As a reason for the decision stated that the appealed decision did not affect him on such way that it is appealable. 5. AA appealed

OLG Stuttgart, order of 1 February 1993 - 4 Ss 573/92, MDR 1993, 572). 13 aa) In doing so, the Chamber does not overlook the fact that in the legal literature

and province of the holder of said supply point that is required in letter aa) of this same article. d) Town of the supply point, which includes the name

political function in XXXX. The AA stated that the information provided by the JA XXXX was correct. In the meantime, the AA had asked the trade union to delete

expressly named by the AA, it was not up to the data protection authority to change such a designation and to exchange the party with whom the AA wished to engage

CoronaVO is unlikely to succeed (aa). The issue of a temporary injunction is also not required in the above sense (bb). 21 aa) The application for a review

suffering by the complainant can be considered under Article 82.1 of the GDPR. aa) The District Court should not have decided, without a reference for a preliminary

data for "journalistic purposes" within the meaning of Article 38 BayDSG. aa. Although the defendant is to be endorsed at least in so far as such regulations

third-country national has committed a serious crime. Such a situation exists here. aa) There is reasonable suspicion against the plaintiff that he was involved

action is only partially justified. a) The application for 1) is unfounded. aa) On the one hand, the plaintiff is asserting the right to information according

jurisdiction of the court, the perrea Kp. Pursuant to Section 13 (3) (a) (aa), the Metropolitan Court has exclusive jurisdiction. Pursuant to Section 27

Strasser/Jabornegg/Resch, ArbVG § 96 Rz 140; Reissner in Zellkomm3 § 96 ArbVG Rz 24 aA Goricnik, replica to Reissner/Schneeberger, note to OGH 9 ObA 23/15w DRdA

in the national damages regime cannot be relied upon without further ado (aA Schweiger in Knyrim, DatKomm Art 82 DSGVO Rz 2). [14] According to Recital

reference is made to the relevant statements in the judgment mentioned. 35 aa) According to Section 24 (2) KSchG, an operation "within the meaning of this

70 (1) FamFG. § Section 14 (4) sentence 7 TMG does not indicate otherwise. aa) For the provision of information pursuant to Section 14 (3) of the German

judgment in its entirety. He alleged a violation: 1.Art. 145 § 1 point 1 of the AA in connection with joke. 134 § 1 of the p.s.a. in connection with joke. 5

the defendant. 32 a) Such a claim would not arise from Art. 82 I GDPR. 33 aa) Based on the plaintiff's submissions, there would already be no violation

higher-ranking law. c) The regulations mentioned do not violate higher-ranking law. aa) The defendant rebukes without success that the regulations violated the reservation