Search results

refer to the Dutch original for more details. ,Brussels Court of Appeal -2020/AR/813 - p. 2 ON: X. [...], requesting party, represented by [...] and [...]

llllllllllllllllllilJC-129/21 - 1 Page 3 Court of Appeal Brussels - 202ol AR/!160 - p. 2ONPROXIMUS NV, public limited company of public law, ON 0202.239

roll no. 2020/AR/329. 12T he tenth plea of both parties. 13 Marktenhof, 28 October 2020, roll no. 2020/AR/721.Hof van beroep Brussel -2021/AR/205 -p. 38 2

(47/2022), also issued on 4 April 2022 and appealed at the Market Court (2022/AR/556). Both the decision of the DPA and the decision of the Market Court are

(19th ch. A), December 7, 2022, 2022/AR/560 and 2022/AR/564; Market Court (19th ch. A), December 7 2022, 2022/AR/556). Decision on merits 149/2023 — 6/36

Appeal on 19 February 2020, in the judgement Hof van beroep Brussels - 2019/AR/1600. IAPP talked about the DPA decision and the Court of Appeal judgement

Article 1 of the AR and is further described in Article 32 of the AR. The court is of the opinion that with the elaboration in Article 6 of the AR, in combination

participant in the CKI and as a participant bound to the AR, which has been established by the BKR. The AR mentions the aim of the credit registration to promote

bound by the CKI General Regulations adopted by BKR (hereinafter: AR). The purpose of the AR is to promote socially responsible financial services. Specifically

Section, 2021/AR/320, 7 July 2021, p. 38. 56Ibidem. 57 Among others, judgments of 19 February 2020 (2019/AR/1600), of 24 January 2021 (2020/AR/1333) and of

mogelijk te maken ”, Market Court, 2019 / AR / 741, 12 juni 2019, p1013 Cour des marchés, September 2, 2020, 2020 / AR / 329. Page 9 Decision on the merits

Brussels, Section Market Chamber A, Chamber for Market Affairs, judgment 2020/AR/329, 2 September 2020, p. 18. 2 In this regard, the Disputes Chamber refers

refer to the Dutch original for more details. Court of Appeal Brussels -2021/AR/320- p. 4 In this context, various companies that offer products and services

September 2020, roll number 2020/AR/1160, p. 4. r PAGE 01-00001785144-0023-0024-02-01-� L _JCourt of appeal Brussels -2020/AR/582- p. 24 Orders the Data Protection

refer to the Dutch original for more details. ,Court of appeal Brussels-2019/AR/741-p. 2 Y, [...], applicant, appearing in person, against a decision of the

Section Marktenhof, 19th Chamber A, Market Affairs Chamber, Judgment 2020/AR/329, 2 September 2020, p. 18. Decision 42/2022 - 3/5 there is insufficient

of the Court (See KG Berlin 3. Senat für Bußgeldsachen - 3 Ws 250/21 - 161 AR 64/21, para 9 for the full list). In short, due to the primacy of EU Law,

Section e Marktenhof (19 Chamber A) of the Court of Appeal in Brussels (2019/AR/1600). APPLICATION 3 FIRST SUBMISSION OF CASSATION Violated legal provisions

the judgment of the Market Court of October 26, 2022, with roll number 2022/AR/457. 2. This decision should be read in conjunction with decision 31/2022

paragraph 4 of the AR - that it has sent written prior information notices and has thus complied with the relevant obligations from the AR. It was neither