Search results
From GDPRhub
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9703988 (category Italian) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of 27 April 2016, relating to the protection of individuals with regard to to the processing of personal222 KB (35,993 words) - 09:52, 20 October 2021
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9900808 (category Italian) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)REGARD to the documentation in the deeds; GIVEN the observations made by the Secretary General pursuant to art. 15 of the Regulation of the Guarantor n157 KB (25,874 words) - 14:36, 27 June 2023
- resolution by the EDPB (Article 65(1)(a) GDPR). The EDPB declared most of the objections of the other DPA’s both relevant and reasoned in the context of Article276 KB (38,206 words) - 09:46, 20 January 2023
- result of the incorrect transposition of Directive 2002/58 of the European Parliament and of the Council /EC of 12 July 2002 on the processing of personal103 KB (16,947 words) - 08:34, 24 April 2024
- (hereinafter the GBA) decided to refer a case to the Inspectorate of the GBA on the basis of Article 63, 1° of the WOG. The reason for the aforementioned84 KB (14,035 words) - 16:56, 12 December 2023
- though the controller had the contact details of the majority of those involved. It further found that, at the time of the investigation, the privacy statement350 KB (51,369 words) - 09:25, 31 January 2024
- Court of Appeal of Brussels - 2019/AR/741 (category Court of Appeal of Brussels (Belgium)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)file of applicant). 3. The legal framework of the jurisdiction of the Marktenhof: The matter is regulated by the GBA Act. With regard to the commencement31 KB (4,878 words) - 13:23, 31 March 2022
- public law, the defendant is the sponsor of the House of History of the Federal Republic of Germany. 4The plaintiff researches the acquisition of the so-called68 KB (11,146 words) - 17:16, 9 March 2022
- falls not within the scope of the principle ne bis in idem”." Lastly, the DPA considered the controller's argument that the assessment of the storage period162 KB (24,007 words) - 19:41, 15 February 2023
- informed of the purpose of the processing nor the legal basis of such processing. As a result, the DPA found a violation of Article 13(1)(c) GDPR. The DPA noted246 KB (39,598 words) - 09:26, 24 April 2024
- ICO - Monetary Penalty on Marriott International Inc. (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Marriott, i the United Kingdom, elsewhere in the EU, and in the rest of the world. 1.5. Marriott was the controller i respect of the personal data of its customers241 KB (31,368 words) - 09:59, 9 May 2022