Search results

89: Abolishment of Indiscriminate General Notification Directive 95/46/EC provided for a general obligation to notify the processing of personal data to

Regulation and Directive 2002/58/EC, that Directive should be amended accordingly. Once this Regulation is adopted, Directive 2002/58/EC should be reviewed

Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data established by Directive 95/46/EC. It should consist of the head of a supervisory

under Article 6(1)(a) or Article 9(2)(a) GDPR, data subjects can withdraw their consent at any time Controllers must make data subjects aware of their

policy under Article 13 should not be too long. Article 12 GDPR may be limited by Union or national Law in accordance with Article 23 GDPR. Article 12(1) GDPR

Category:Article 33 GDPR There was no equivalent to Article 33 GDPR under the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC. Indeed, Article 17 of the Directive only

89: Abolishment of Indiscriminate General Notification Directive 95/46/EC provided for a general obligation to notify the processing of personal data to

European Union ("CFR"), as well as Directive 95/46/EC. In the event that such verification is successful, the agreement will remain in force "notwithstanding

89: Abolishment of Indiscriminate General Notification Directive 95/46/EC provided for a general obligation to notify the processing of personal data to

likelihood and severity of risks to the rights and freedoms of individuals. Article 32(1) GDPR makes use of the same concept - "state of the art" - that was

retraced to the GDPR’s predecessor, the Directive 95/46/EC (DPD). In particular, Article 18 DPD mentioned the role of a ‘data protection official’ who ensured

(a) of Article 6(1) or point (a) of Article 9(2), the existence of the right to withdraw consent at any time, without affecting the lawfulness of processing

directly applicable. Article 2(2)(d) GDPR excludes any processing that falls under the scope of the LED from the scope of the GDPR. Article 10 GDPR is intended

Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 38 GDPR, p. 702 (Oxford University Press 2020). In addition, although Directive 95/46/EC did not require organisations

Default', 20 October 2020 (Version 2.0), p. 6 (available here). Article 28(1) literally repeats the wording of Article 25(1): "processors providing sufficient

those answers prove to be inaccurate, within the meaning of Article 6(1)(d) of Directive 95/46, for example due to the fact that, by mistake, the examination

stored in a "filing system" within the meaning of Article 4(6) GDPR. See also Article 2(1) GDPR on the scope of the GDPR when it comes to non-automated filing

violation of Directive 95/46/EC. In particular, the provision on which disclosure of employees’ data was based seemed in conflict with Articles 6(1)(b) and

Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data established by Directive 95/46/EC. It should consist of the head of a supervisory

provision under the Directive 95/46/EC (Data Protection Directive – DPD), specifically Article 27(1). Accordingly, certain codes of conduct have already