Search results

Lower court: LG Munich I, final judgment of February 26, 2021 – 41 O 7178/20 Findings: BeckRS 2022, 16827 ZD 2022, 563 LSK 2022, 16827 tenor I. Upon the defendant's

juris; OLG Munich, decision of 17 June 2018 - 15 W 86/18 -, juris; OLG Munich, decision of 17 June 2018 - 15 W 86/18 -, juris; OLG Munich, decision of

2021 (see point I.6), ./33 - statement of MB from 05/04/2021 (see point I.7), ./34 - Statement of the BF1 from 05/05/2021 (see Point I.8), ./35 - Opinion

U 206/20 -, juris para. 59 ff.; LG Düsseldorf, judgment of October 28, 2021 - 16 O 128/20 -, juris para. 37; LG Munich I, judgment of December 9, 2021 -

damage as a result (cf. LG Munich I, judgment of December 9th, 2021 - 31 O 16606/20, GRUR-RS 2021, 41707). B. The lawsuit is unfounded t.I. The plaintiff has

The Regional Court of Erfurt (LG Erfurt) requested a preliminary ruling by the CJEU on, among others, the question whether making an access request for

23a (2017 Munich). See e.g.: OLG Dresden, decision dated 12.9.2022 – 4 U 1327/22; OLG Nürnberg, decision dated 21.11.2022 – 8 U 1621/22; LG Frankfurt (Oder)

OLG Cologne, NJW-RR 2019, 1213 m.w. Nachw.; LG Offenburg, judgment of 26 September 2018 - 2 O 310/18-, juris; LG Stuttgart, judgment of 29 August 2019 - 11

below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Court: LG Ravensburg 2nd Civil Chamber Decision

the file. Reasons for decision The action is admissible, but unfounded. I. The LG Frankfurt a.M. has international and local jurisdiction. This is not in

decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. I. With the lawsuit, the plaintiff has requested

jameda.de). BGH, judgment of December 13, 2022 - VI ZR 54/21 - OLG Munich LG Munich I - 2 - The VI Civil Senate of the Federal Court of Justice has on the

refer to the judgment of the LG Köln in case 33 O 376/22 for further details. However, the court reversed the decision of the LG Köln with respect to the claim

issue is noted above all if navigation is carried out domestically, i.e. in Germany, takes place. In addition, there is a domestic connection in the provision

asserted by the plaintiff are to be assessed according to German law. This follows from Article 3(1) Rome I Regulation in conjunction with the choice of law in

The Administrative Court Munich rejected a request for interim relief directed against the collection and storing of Covid-19 test certificates by a school

also the GDPR (LG Munich I, judgment from December 9th, 2021, Az.: 31 0 16606/20; LG Essen, judgment of November 10th, 2022 - 6 0 1 1 1/22; LG Regensburg,

the defendant offers to German users. There are conditions of use and community standards to regulate the use; by clicking the "I agree" button on May 21

addresses and e-mail addresses of the association's members directly to them, i.e. without the involvement of a trustee. These data were necessary in preparation

below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. Tenor I. The plaintiff's appeal against the