Search results

GHDHA - 200.290.360-01
The Court of Appeal Den Haag held that a law firm could restrict the information provided to data subjects pursuant to Articles 13, 14, and 15 GDPR in

35 KB (5,770 words) - 07:13, 4 April 2022
GHDHA - 200.291.947/01
947/01 European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2021:1924 Appeal from: Rb. Den Haag (Netherlands) C/09/595546 / HA RK 20-314 Appeal to: Original Language(s):

41 KB (6,941 words) - 10:56, 17 November 2021
Gerechtshof Den Haag - 200.271.226/01 (category Gerechtshof Den Haag (Netherlands))
GHDHA - 200.271.226/01 Court: Gerechtshof Den Haag (Netherlands) Jurisdiction: Netherlands Relevant Law: Article 21(1) GDPR UAVG Decided: 16.07.2020 Published:

20 KB (3,205 words) - 12:23, 4 October 2021
Hoge Raad - ECLI:NL:PHR:2023:935
January 2021, the case was brought to the attention of the Court of Appeal of Den Haag. In those proceedings, in an attempt to avoid liability, the data subject

103 KB (17,620 words) - 10:13, 29 November 2023
Rb. Amsterdam - C/13/694440 / KG ZA 20-1118 (category Rb. Amsterdam (Netherlands))
the decision, does not apply. Case ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2020:2068 Gerechtshof Den Haag. The Court ruled that Article 6(1)(f) provided for the legal basis for

19 KB (3,086 words) - 09:21, 7 April 2021
PHR - 22/01253
2.8, Rb. East Brabant 29 June 2016, ECLI:NL:RBOBR:2016:3387, para. 4.10., Rb. Overijssel April 6, 2021, ECLI:NL:RBOVE:2021:2525, para. 4.10. and Rb. The

241 KB (42,617 words) - 14:14, 13 September 2022