Search results

2019 that it was operating. Following Article 83(5)(a)GDPR, read in the lights of Recital (148) GDPR, the AEPD issued a reprimand to the owner of the video

operations, it is necessary to fall back on article 6.1. AVG and recital 50 GDPR. Recital 50 of the GDPR states that this is a separate legal basis required for

justification or basis for the processing, violating Article 9 GDPR. AEPD highlighted that Recital 46 GDPR already recognizes that, in exceptional situations, such

the infringement of its collaboration duties as per Article 58(2) of the GDPR. The decision is the consequence of a complaint submitted by a Spanish citizen

individual for failing to comply with the right to information (Article 13 GDPR) when collecting personal data on its website. A citizen brought to the attention

under Article 6(1) GDPR. In light of this, the DPA issued a fine of €70,000 to másLUZ Energía (SIE) by virtue of Article 83(5) GDPR for unlawful processing

infringement of the data minimisation principle related, as per Article 5(1)(c) GDPR. The decision is the consequence of a complaint submitted by another Spanish

warning, in accordance with Article 58(2)(b) of the GDPR, in connection with the above-mentioned Recital 148. Therefore, in accordance with the applicable

information.” Recitals 39 and 60 of the GDPR help to specify the scope of the right of information that is given to the interested parties. Recital 39 establishes:

Regulation (EU) 2016/679, of April 27, 2016, General Data Protection (GDPR), in its recital 18, indicates that this Regulation does not apply to the processing

doubts about the identity of the person making the request”. Moreover, Recital 64 GDPR require the measures adopted to identify data subjects to be “reasonable”

means of such activity, by virtue of article 4.7 of the GDPR. For its part, article 5.1.c) of the GDPR regulates the “principles relating to processing” establishing

consequent infringement of the data minimisation principle (Article 5(1)(c) GDPR). The decision is the consequence of a complaint submitted by a Spanish citizen

is charged with committing an offense for violation of article 6.1 of the GDPR, which states that: "one. The treatment will only be lawful if it complies

consent under Article 4(11) GDPR and Article 6(1) LOPDGDD (National data protection law aimed at the implementation of the GDPR). In both articles, consent

violated the GDPR. A citizen submitted a complaint before the AEPD stating that privacy policy of www.banderacatalana.cat did not comply with the GDPR. GRUP BC

of the general information duty included in Article 13 GDPR. Is this a violation of Article 13 GDPR? The AEPD held that there had been a violation of Article

as “anonymisation”. Recital 26 of the GDPR clarifies that anonymous information does not fall within the scope of the GDPR. The GDPR does not explicitly

infringement of Article 32 GDPR. Therefore, the Spanish DPA issued a warning sanction for each violation of Article 5(1)(f) and Article 32 GDPR. AEPD highlighted

hours of employees without having informed them in accordance with Article 13 GDPR. The AEPD received a letter filed by the interested party against the respondent