Search results

From GDPRhub
  • The Supreme Administrative Court of France rejected Google’s appeal to annul the CNIL’s fine of € 100 million, imposed for the violation of Article 82
    36 KB (5,595 words) - 16:12, 2 February 2022
  • Court of Appeal - 2020/123 (category Court of Appeal (Ireland))
    appealed to the Circuit Court. The Circuit Court upheld the DPC’s decision. The data subject appealed again to the High Court. The High Court found that the DPC
    64 KB (9,589 words) - 16:15, 1 June 2022
  • conducted. The Court therefore did not order the suspension of the Health Data Hub. It is interesting that the French Supreme Administrative Court seems to go
    51 KB (7,830 words) - 09:50, 29 October 2020
  • case. The court that made the decision. If you have a court decision, there will generally be an auto-suggest based on the abbreviation of the court. Just
    17 KB (2,638 words) - 11:18, 19 February 2024
  • Regional Court, Vienna, Austria) on 7 December 2020. The data subject therefore lodged an appeal with the Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court). The latter
    12 KB (1,634 words) - 14:50, 30 April 2024
  • the English original for more details. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICEQUEEN'S BENCH DIVISIONTHE HON. MR JUSTICE
    87 KB (14,773 words) - 09:28, 1 March 2022
  • and sharing pictures (when they could not always be recognised). The Supreme Court stated that imposing penalties for enterprises requires that a person
    18 KB (2,375 words) - 16:17, 6 December 2023
  • there, is belied by SR's evidence and the ruling of the Supreme Court of Israel that the courts of that jurisdiction were not the appropriate forum to litigate
    108 KB (18,178 words) - 11:57, 29 November 2021
  • following the latter’s rejection he referred to the German Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof - BGH). The Court rejected the action on the grounds that the public
    133 KB (21,944 words) - 15:59, 22 March 2022
  • for more details. dish Supreme Court Decision date June 23, 2021 Business number 6Ob56 / 21k head The Supreme Court, as a court of appeal by the Senate
    127 KB (21,056 words) - 08:17, 19 August 2021
  • differently by the Court of Appeal or if the legal question resolved by the appellate court is to be assessed differently. 18. The Supreme Court states first
    103 KB (16,947 words) - 08:34, 24 April 2024
  • by the Court of Appeal of Amsterdam in its judgment of 24 June 2004 (ECLI:NL:HR:2005: AU4019 ([name of party])) (ratified by the Supreme Court) can (still
    30 KB (4,796 words) - 16:13, 10 March 2022
  • entity under foreign law META PLATFORMS IRELAND LTD., formerly FACEBOOK IRELAND LTD., established in Dublin (Ireland), defendants, lawyer mr. G.H. Potjewijd
    243 KB (40,160 words) - 11:54, 5 April 2023
  • The French Supreme Administrative Court considered that the automatic transfers of tax data between France and the United States under the FATCA Agreement
    28 KB (4,287 words) - 09:20, 23 February 2024
  • decision of the lower court. The Higher Regional Court Munich (Oberlandesgericht München) overturned the decision of the lower court and dismissed the data
    22 KB (3,418 words) - 10:28, 14 November 2022
  • a position on neither Meta Platforms Ireland Limited (formerly Facebook Ireland Limited, hereinafter Meta Ireland) nor Meta Plat- forms, Inc. (formerly
    104 KB (14,260 words) - 13:54, 9 June 2023
  • employee. The Celle Higher Regional Court rejected her claim and then she referred to the Federal Constitutional Court. The Court decided for the first time that
    127 KB (21,367 words) - 16:00, 22 March 2022
  • controller's establishment in Ireland. The Court added that the controller's argument that the right to bring proceedings before the Court of the data subject's
    92 KB (15,064 words) - 12:26, 28 June 2023
  • enterprise if no one has proven guilty. The Supreme Court refers to more recent practice from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) where a "mental link"
    91 KB (14,440 words) - 10:06, 17 November 2023
  • The Spanish Supreme Court (TS) confirmed a fine of 7,500 € imposed on the company Miraclia Telecomunicaciones S.L. (the defendant), as owner of the "o
    48 KB (7,584 words) - 12:55, 16 September 2021
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)