Search results

GDPR (UAVG) was not applicable. The Court of Appeal of Amsterdam stated, firstly, that the term 'journalistic' within the meaning of Article 43 UAVG should

inthiscaseincludingtheBVRandTVS. Withdrawn on that date pursuant to article 51 of the UAVG and the Personal Data Protection Act (Wbp). 6/25 Date Unidentified November

on [Article 9 GDPR] and Article 29 of the Dutch GDPR Implementation Act (“UAVG”). The store employee did not agree that the processing of the fingerprint

Regulation (hereinafter: UAVG). [applicant] has submitted his application in view of the provisions of art. 35 paragraph 2 UAVG submitted on time. To that

of law between the Spanish decree and the Dutch law implementing the GDPR (UAVG), which prohibits the company from collecting national identification numbers

predecessor of art. 35 UAvg – was ruled in the same sense in the appeal case law.1 It is not apparent from the parliamentary history of the UAvg that under the

Rabobank referred to Article 35(2) of the Dutch Act implementing the GDPR (UAVG), which provides that an interested party (i.e. data subject) who disagrees

General Data Protection Implementation Act (hereinafter: UAVG) apply to the present dispute. 4.6. The UAVG stipulates that the permission of their legal representative(s)

the GDPR, read in in connection with article 14, third paragraph, of the UAVG, the AP is authorized to DPG in the event of a violation of Article 12 of

and Section 83(4) of the AVG, read in conjunction with Section 14(3) of the UAVG. The AP applies the Penalty Policy Rules 2019 (hereinafter: Penalty Policy

exceptional cases are mentioned in Articles 32 and 33 of the UAVG. a. Brain 3.12. Article 33(4)(c) of the UAVG states that criminal personal data may be processed

the Implementing Act of the GDPR (UAVG), which follows from the right to object, Article 21 GDPR. Article 35(2) UAVG stipulates that the appeal must be

pursuant to Article 35 of the General Data Protection Implementing Act (UAVG). Moreover, the controller claimed that the request of 15 February 2021 was

any case within one month of receipt. Article 34 GDPR Implementation Act (“UAVG”) states that a written decision on the request is a decision within the

The six-week period applicable to such requests pursuant to Article 35(2) UAVG expired on 24 January 2020. The first summary summons was served on Rabobank

into force on 25 May 2018. On the same date, the AVG Implementation Act (UAVG) entered into force and Article 51 of that Act repealed the Wbp. The AVG

Regulation as AVG and the General Data Protection Regulation Implementation Act as UAVG. 1 The course of the procedure 1.1. On August 11, 2021, [applicant] submitted

in the UAVG should be disapplied and whether this is necessary and proportionate to safeguard the interests referred to in Article 41 (1) UAVG. Moreover

rejection to Court within the legal term of 6 weeks (under Article 35(2) UAVG), which makes his request inadmissible. Heist Finance also argues that the

Netherlands, these exceptions have been elaborated in article 41 UAVG. Article 41 paragraph 1 under i UAVG states that the interest of a person concerned must give