Search results

as to the reliability of the AOD in the case - who, after all, is an entity with an interest in not disclosing the fact of the breach committed by its

Article 83 of the RGPD that an administrative fine of EUR 500 000, an injunction accompanied by a periodic penalty payment and an additional publication penalty

com/abstract=3319284. 10, i. An end user requests a web page; ii. The publisher's ad server on the web page selects an SSP; iii. The SSP then selects an Ad exchange; iv

Chamber emphasises that the purpose of imposing an administrative fine is not to only to put an end to an offence committed but, above all, to ensure effective

are monitored by an independent body. Art. 47 Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy and an impartial court

therein do not allow an individual to challenge in court the election procedure of the head of a DPA. This judgement stemmed from an appeal against a decision

its usual meaning, indicates a “faithful reproduction or transcription of an original” in opposition to a “purely general description” of data. The true

necessarily understand that they are seeing an ad or how an ad has been targeted towards them. • There is also an assessment of the impact on human rights

storage of the ID. Consent is also not valid if data subjects must complete an additional form setting out that refusal. Orange  România SA is a  provider 

2021, it appears that «[…]». The company is now planning an IPO in 2022. The audit points out that an IPO of a company means that the public has a clear interest

its holder. When an advantage or service is offered to a citizen by means of his identity card as part of a computer application, an alternative that does

luz Energía (SIE) to via an SMS. 2nd. There is certification of the digital signature of the supply contract by sending of an SMS with SIE, on July 14

The HDPA of Greece examined the complaint of an employee of the Hellenic Electricity Distribution Network Operator S.A. against the latter regarding a

Regulation as follows: "Any information about an identified or identifiable natural person (" the data subject "); an identifiable natural person is a person

Article 22(1) GDPR. In particular, it asked whether an automated creation of a credit score value constitutes an automated decision within the meaning of this

about the health of an employee of such service, when those data are required for determining that employee's working capacity. Allowing an exception to the

Article 83(5) GDPR provides that an infringer may be subject to an “administrative fines up to 20 000 000 EUR, or in the case of an undertaking, up to 4 % of

a delivery address is an absolute necessity for the delivery of goods to the customers. Thus, Intervare does not detect whether an address is secret, as

An employee had submitted a complaint to the Greek Data Protection Authority about the video surveillance in the store in which she had worked. The Greek

personal data passed on to an uninvolved and unauthorized third party. This will make the Plaintiff exposed and there is also an indirect threat of potential