Search results

____________________ HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT APPROVED ____________________ Crown Copyright © LADY JUSTICE ARDEN: overview of this appeal Appeal concerns a subject

processing of personal data, but not on other aspects of privacy interventions, copyright, organization of school work, teachers' work responsibilities, etc. that

'as part of the measures taken, the Platform Administrator developed a copyright amendment to the system [...], which makes it technically impossible to

the readers. The link to the author contained in the articles is owed copyright regulations and would be clicked by the users in the fewest cases anyway

photo was taken on commission. In that case the photographer, who has the copyright to the photograph as the creator of the photograph, may not publish the

such as trade secrets or intellectual property, in particular software copyright, as stated in recital 63 of the Data Protection Regulation. Information

has infringed the portrait right of [plaintiff] under Article 21 of the Copyright Act (hereinafter: Aw), both in respect of her exploitation rights and her

has the right to intervene. In practice, deletion occurs in the event of copyright infringement, for child protection reasons or in cases in which the safety

____________________ HTML VERSION OF APPROVED JUDGMENT� ____________________ Crown Copyright © Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down by the judge remotely

Article 85(2) GDPR and German national law Sections 22, 23 KUG (Act on Copyright in Works of Fine Arts and Photography) and Section 19(1) of the Berlin

others, including trade secrets or intellectual property, and in particular copyright, which protects software. If the controller handles a large amount of information

the complaint include the following: (i) the defendant had published copyrighted material in its website without the consent, (ii) the website did not

towards it by violating its portrait right as laid down in Article 21 of the Copyright Act (hereinafter: Aw), in violation of the General Data Protection Regulation

[claimant] invokes in the first place the provisions of Article 21 of the Copyright Act (hereinafter: AW), stating that he has not given (explicit) permission

Article 80, paragraph 1, points 1 and 2 of the Act of 4 February 1994. - Copyright, consolidated text. Dz.U. z 2019 r. poz. 1231, hereinafter - aut.) and

including business secrets or intellectual property and, in particular, the copyright protecting the software. However, those considerations should not lead

the DPA, that it is capable of embracing matters as varied as breach of copyright, defamation, harassment and negligence. If Parliament had intended to exclude

and has been with the same user since then. The website itself has been copyrighted 2013. Turnover and number of customers The travel agency's turnover in

interlocutory proceedings it must be assumed that the provisions of the Copyright Act do not apply to the present dispute. 4.5. The General Data Protection

such as business secrets or intellectual property, in particular software copyright. However, taking these factors into account should not result in any information