Search results

Articles 5, paragraph 1 to 1. c) and article 5, paragraph 1 al. f) with article83, paragraph 5, al. a), the General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation679/2016

Ziggo et al. pointed out that the damage that DFW suffers as a result of the individual downloader is very small, since according to Ziggo et al. the Film

uitmaakt van de litigieuze klacht. Het betreft hier o.a. de vraag naar het al dan niet van toepassing zijn van de voornoemde aanbeveling. 4. De verweerder

version of the Privacy Ordinance, legal commentary», December 2019, Skullerud et al. Objective personal information is, for example, the data subject's age, address

Anwara Sp. z o.o., with its registered office in Warsaw at Al. Jerozolimskie 81 (formerly: Al. Solidarności 117/207), hereinafter referred to as the "Company"

necessary to achieve these goals (2019. judgment of 24 September GC et al. GC et al. [Delete links to special data], C‑136/17, EU:C:2019:773, paragraph 74)

inadmissible his claim against Arrow and dismissed the claims against ING et al., ordering [the appellant] to pay the costs of the proceedings and the follow-up

Personal Data Act and the Privacy Ordinance - Commentary edition», Skullerud et al. (2019). Article 29 Working Party Opinion 06/2014 on the concept of legitimate

Seitlinger et al, C-293/12 and C-594/12, EU:C:2014:238, nos. 35, 47 and 54 et seq.; Constitutional Court of Austria, decision of 27 June 2014, G 47/12 et al, AT:VFGH:2014:G47

ricezione dello stesso, a comunicare quali iniziative siano state intraprese al fine di dare attuazione a quanto prescritto e di fornire ogni elemento ritenuto

condotta per i sistemi informativi gestiti da soggetti privati in tema di crediti al consumo, affidabilità e puntualità nei pagamenti” – was not expired yet, the

DatenschutzR/Stender-Vorwachs, Ed. 28, Article 85 marginal no. 20; Frey, in: Schwartmann et al, DSGVO/BDSG, 2018, Art. 85 para. 25; further probably Schiedermair, in: Ehmann/Selmayr

C-136/17, GC et al. (31) The judgment of the European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) on 24 September 2019 in case C136/17, GC et al. is a continuation

DatenschutzR/Stender-Vorwachs, Ed. 28, Article 85 marginal no. 20; Frey, in: Schwartmann et al, DSGVO/BDSG, 2018, Art. 85 para. 25; further probably Schiedermair, in: Ehmann/Selmayr

decline of regulatory offences in particular and video surveillance (Gill et al., Assessing the impact of CCTV, the South City Case Study, Home Office Online

37/2020. In their short commentary on the decision, linked below, Craddock et al. also highlight the fact that part of the infringement, as well as at least

question now with due consideration ( of the evidence provided by Proximus al-dan-not in support of the need for the requested suspension, { of the balancing

websites is usually covered by the journalist exemption, see Wille Johansen et al., Personal Data Act commentary edition, Universitetsforlaget 2001, page 92

cases of Vnukovo Airlines (V.A.) and Others v. v. Vnukovo Airlines (V.A.) et al. Attorney General (2001) A.A.D. 969 and Kyriakides v. Republic (2013) 3 A

obligations under Article 6, §2, al. 5 and Article 9 of the Camera Act 1 2. there is a serious indication that article 6, § 2, al. 4 of the aforementioned law