Search results
From GDPRhub
- and the data protection officer; (b) the purposes of the processing; (c) a description of the categories of data subjects and of the categories of personal31 KB (3,327 words) - 15:31, 5 June 2023
- APD/GBA (Belgium) - 161/2022 (category Article 3(2) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Article 3 of the GDPR assumes of two different cases. In the first case (Article 3.1 of the GDPR), the data processing carried out in the context of the activities19 KB (2,689 words) - 15:30, 23 November 2022
- hereinafter: ZVOP-2), according to point 2 of the first paragraph of Article 103 of ZVOP-2 and according to point 3 of the first paragraph of Article 105 of ZVOP-221 KB (3,272 words) - 08:50, 1 March 2024
- Datatilsynet (Norway) - 20/02136 (category Article 3(2) GDPR) (section (a) the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement taking into account the nature scope or purpose of the processing concerned as well as the number of data subjects affected and the level of damage suffered by them)relevant in the present case. The NO DPA rejects Grindr's argument according to which the interpretation of the article violated was not clear. The NO DPA confirms18 KB (2,375 words) - 16:17, 6 December 2023
- in the text of the Regulation exempts such a category of data from the scope of the law. Finally, the DPA assessed whether the controller had a valid legal25 KB (3,679 words) - 11:30, 2 August 2023
- CJEU - C-230/14 - Weltimmo (section Was the processing carried out 'in the context of [Weltimmo's] activities' in Hungary?)circumstances, of the use of those data for the purpose of the invoicing of the advertisements after a period of one month." It referred to the Lindqvist and13 KB (1,888 words) - 13:07, 1 June 2023
- for the data transfer referred to in item 2.a). 3) The complaint against the respondent to the second complaint on the grounds of a violation of the general108 KB (17,097 words) - 13:52, 12 May 2023
- CNIL (France) - SAN-2022-024 (category Article 3 GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)subjects in the EU (Article 3(2)(a) GDPR). The DPA concluded that Article 3(2)(b) GDPR was also not applicable. The DPA mentioned that the online collection30 KB (4,714 words) - 10:34, 4 January 2023
- Article 60 GDPR (section (3) Duty of lead supervisory authority (LSA) to communicate the relevant information and submit a draft decision)Cooperation Where the processing of personal data takes place in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the Union and35 KB (4,017 words) - 16:04, 18 March 2024
- 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council leaves intact and in no way affects the level of protection of natural persons with regard to the processing22 KB (2,177 words) - 10:01, 19 March 2024
- article 3 of the French Data Protection Act because the use of cookies is carried out within the framework of the activities of the company Google France which93 KB (14,936 words) - 17:09, 6 December 2023
- Authority for the Spanish autonomous region of the Basque Country. It is in charge of enforcing the GDPR in the public sector within the Basque Country3 KB (195 words) - 13:21, 15 September 2021
- DI-2020-11373 2(23) Date: 2023-06-30 2.2.1 Applicable regulations, etc. ................................................... .....9 2.2.2 The Privacy Protection113 KB (12,773 words) - 15:20, 6 December 2023
- Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-431-0061 (Helsingor decision no. 2) (category Article 5(2) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)in line with the GDPR. Furthermore, until the Municipality of Helsingor complies with the GDPR, the DPA suspended transfers of data to the United States75 KB (11,733 words) - 16:33, 21 August 2022
- Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-431-0061 (Helsingor decision no. 1) (category Article 5(2) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)high. . The warning shall be issued in accordance with Article 58 (2) of the Data Protection Regulation. 2, letter a. If the assessments of the risk made48 KB (7,442 words) - 10:24, 12 September 2022
- Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-431-0061 (Helsingor decision no. 3) (category Article 58(2)(f) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Article 36(1), the ban is effective until the DPA has provided such consultation as per Article 36(2) or the DPA otherwise permits the processing until117 KB (18,075 words) - 10:19, 12 September 2022
- AKI (Estonia) - EDPBI:ee:OSS:d:2022:343 (category Article 7(2) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)at a German DPA (not clear which German DPA) on 2 January 2020, which transferred the complaint on 7 May 2020 to the Estonian DPA (DPA), the lead supervisory42 KB (5,644 words) - 14:35, 30 November 2022
- informed of outcome of the investigation would compromise the objectives of GDPR. The CJEU added that a DPA assessing a complaint has a margin of discretion15 KB (2,180 words) - 08:23, 13 December 2023
- decision on the language of the proceedings. Interlocutory decision 01/2021 - 4/6 2. Motivation 10. As part of the analysis of the language of the proceedings19 KB (2,707 words) - 16:50, 12 December 2023
- translation of the final decision to the provide parties. 3. On 4 February 2021, the DPA also provided the parties with the inspection report of 13 July 20208 KB (1,156 words) - 16:56, 12 December 2023