Search results

the event that your complaint concerns a controller established in another MS, this will be considered as a cross-border case and will be forwarded to the

no impact on their rank or their remuneration. Current Commissioners are: Ms Tine A. Larsen (Chair), Mr Thierry Lallemang (Commissioner), Mr Marc Lemmer

his judgment are a complete answer to this part of Ms Proops' argument:
 
 
 "… I reject Ms Proops' argument that the disclosure on the web of

owner of the property is Ms. A.A.A. with an e-mail address for notification purposes ***EMAIL.1 and the tenants are Mr. B.B.B. and Ms. C.C.C., with an e-mail

phases in which Ms XX had come into contact with the same. In particular, the Provincial Director, XX, declared that: - "the request (from Ms XX) was received

At the hearing, at the request of the President without the right to vote, Ms Maria Alikaakou, a specialist scientist/auditor as assistant rapporteur and

relationship of Ms. A.A.A. and his family with AUTOMÓVILES FERSÁN, SA from a Chronological point of view is as follows:  October 25, 2018. Ms. C.C.C. (Sister

transferred to Ms X in April 2020, and that neither Y2 nor Mr. Y1 are (any longer) administrators of the fan page. 10. On 15 July 2020, Ms. X submitted her

the former business partner of Ms X the Partnership because, according to Ms V, the former business partner of Ms X (Mr W) must give his consent. Z bvba

been taken in those proceedings. Suffice it to say that they are ongoing. Ms Ziva Robertson, a partner of MWE, states in her witness statement as follows:

The Agencia Española de Protección de Datos filed a case brought by ms. A.A.A against mr. B.B.B in which the applicant denounced that the respondent had

/__Secure-1PAPISID .google.com / ANONCHK .c.clarity.ms /CLID .clarity.ms / NID .google.es /SEARCH_E .google.com / MR .c.clarity.ms /ts .creativecdn.com/ _RwBf .bing.com

​​"XXXX". 4.2. Within this area, Ms. XXXX is again the head of product and quality management; In the course of this, Ms. XXXX is also managing director

April 2019, which rejected the complaint submitted by Mr. A.A.A., representing Ms. B.B.B. against KUTXABANK, S.A., for failure to comply with the exercise of

00101/2021 Considering the claim made on July 27, 2020 before this Agency by Ms. A.A.A. , against the HEALTH SERVICE OF THE PRINCIPALITY OF ASTURIAS, for

/ 00291/2020, instructed by the Spanish Agency for Data Protection, before Ms. A.A.A. (*** COMPANY.1), with NIF: *** NIF.1, holder of the website, *** URL

claim made on March 23, 2022 before this Agency by D. A.A.A. on behalf of Ms. B.B.B. , against the HEALTH SERVICE OF THE ILLES BALEARS (IB-SALUT), for

LINDEN, president, Mr. Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, vice-president, Ms. Christine MAUGÜÉ and Ms. Isabelle LATOURNARIE-WILLEMS, and Mr. Bertrand of MARAIS, members;

formulated by Ms. A.A.A. against the HEALTH COUNCIL OF THE COMMUNITY OF MADRID - MADRID HEALTH SERVICE. SECOND: TO NOTIFY this resolution to Ms. A.A.A. and

Protection and based on the following BACKGROUND FIRST: On 06/22/2018 a letter from Ms AAA (hereinafter, the claimant) has entered the Spanish Agency for Data Protection

RESOLUTION Nº: R/00290/2020 Having regard to the complaint made to this Agency by Ms. A.A.A., (from now the plaintiff), against EVO BANCO, S.A.U. (now the claimed)

Were present, during the restricted training session of 19 September 2019: Ms. Sophie Lambremon, Commissioner, in her report; As representative of the company

RESOLUTION Nº: R/00319/2020 Having regard to the complaint made to this Agency by Ms. A.A.A., (from now the complainant), against CAIXABANK, S.A. (now the claimed)

RESOLVES: FIRST: DISMISS the claim made by Ms. A.A.A. versus CAIXABANK, S.A. SECOND: NOTIFY this resolution to Ms. A.A.A. and CAIXABANK, S.A. In accordance

filed a complaint with the Data Protection Authority (DPA), against Mr. Y1 and Ms. Y2, "the controllers". The subject of the complaint was the installation

in the Netherlands, TikTok is one of the most popular apps right now,' said Ms Verdier. 'It can be fun to make videos together and see what other people

the contract without Ms Y's consent and sent invoices to the new billing address. Moreover, such invoices still contained details of Ms Y, such as email address

with the Spanish DPA (AEPD) stating that the owner of a commercial website, Ms. A.A.A., herein the data controller, violated Article 6 GDPR and Article 13

president, Mr. Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, vice-president, Ms. Isabelle LATOURNAIRE-WILLEMS and Ms. Christine MAUGÜÉ, MM. Alain DRU and Bertrand du MARAIS

left after the hearing of the case and before the conference and decision and Ms Papageorgopoulou, an official in the Administration Department of the Authority

the Director of the Agency Spanish Data Protection RESOLVES: FIRST: IMPOSE Ms. B.B.B., with NIF *** NIF.2, for a violation of Article 6.1 of the RGPD, typified

Agency for Data Protection and based on to the following: BACKGROUND FIRST: Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter, the claiming party) dated March 2, 2022 filed a claim

without an account, however, customers were required to enter their title (Ms./Mr.) and their date of birth in the online form. After receiving a complaint

informed her that completing the survey was voluntary (optional). Ms. D. K. did not inform Ms. J. about any other recommendations concerning the method or date

the Spanish Data Protection Agency and based on the following: FACTS FIRST: Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter, the complaining party) on February 5, 2022 filed a claim

The plaintiff disregarded the objections expressed by Ms. K., head of payroll accounting, and Ms. T., payroll accountant, that Mr. G., as a member of the

fine on Ms M. Z. conducting business activity under the name K., the President of the Office for Personal Data Protection establishing that Ms M. Z. conducting

Alexandre LINDEN, Chairman, Mr Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, Vice-Chairman, Ms Anne DEBET, Ms Christine MAUGÜÉ, Mr Alain DRU and Mr Bertrand du MARAIS, members;

R/00651/2019 Having regard to the complaint made on 8 April 2019 to this Agency by Ms. A.A.A., against the CGT SECTOR FEDERAL DE TELEMARKETING, for not having duly

Spanish Agency for Data Protection RESOLVES: FIRST: ESTIMATE the claim made by Ms. A.A.A. and urge ASSOCIACIÓ FOR POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN CATALUNYA with

sanction the unlawful processing of personal data relating to an employee. Ms. XX, an employee of TB s.r.l., claims a violation of her data protection rights

B, Director ..., Ms. C, Head of ..., D..., Head of ... of the Bank and the Group, Mr. E, Head of ... of the Bank and the Group, Ms. F, Head ... of the

of the Lebon collection Reading the Thursday December 10, 2020 Rapporteur Ms. Myriam Benlolo Carabot Public reporter M. Alexandre Lallet Lawyer (s) SCP

C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 3/18 name of Ms. A.A.A., we inform you that a request for portability on April 2, 2019 with

Alexandre LINDEN, president, Mr. Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, vice-president, Ms. Christine MAUGÜÉ, MM. Alain DRU and Bertrand du MARAIS, members; Having regard

restricted formation composed of Mr. Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, vice-president, Ms. Isabelle LATOURNARIE-WILLEMS and Christine MAUGÜÉ; MM. Alain DRU and Bertrand

Justification The Office for the Protection of Personal Data received a complaint from Ms J. B. (hereinafter: "the Complainant"), regarding irregularities in the processing

Spanish Agency for Data Protection RESOLVES: FIRST: ESTIMATE the claim made by Ms. AAA and urge XFERA MÓVILES, SA with NIF A82528548, so that, within ten business

Defendant was second by-line with Ms Bertrand in a piece for Atlantic magazine. On 14th April 2019, just as she moved to Politico, Ms Bertrand praised the Second

Agency for the Protection of Data and based on the following: ACTS FIRST: Ms. AAA (hereinafter, the claimant) dated March 3, 2020 filed a claim with the

FIRST: DISMISS the claim made by Ms. A.A.A. Front of COUNCIL OF EDUCATION, *** IES B.B.B .. SECOND: NOTIFY this resolution to Ms. A.A.A. and to the COUNCIL OF

productions, - the pleading of 25 June 2019, in which Ms Van Kaam and Ms Van Lith pleaded on behalf of DFW and Ms Van den Brink and Spauwen on behalf of Ziggo et

Steuerberatungsgesellschaft mbH carries out data processing in relation to Ms. Jutta A *** for the purpose of tax advice and auditing on behalf of her clients

one who had to deliver the package to Ms. A.A.A.. The courier delivered the package to the neighbor indicated by Ms. A.A.A., a fact not disputed by the complainant

the Director of the Spanish Data Protection Agency RESOLVES: FIRST: IMPOSE Ms. B.B.B., with NIF ***NIF.1, for a violation of the Article 5.1.c) and 13 of

Agency for Data Protection and based on to the following: BACKGROUND FIRST: Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter, the complaining party) dated November 23 2021 filed

Office. 2.12 Following my Office's written and telephone communication with Ms., an inspection of the administrative file was arranged on May 11, 2022. It

Protection and based on to the following BACKGROUND FIRST: The claim filed by Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter the claimant), It has an entry dated 04/29/2019 in the

Unpublished in the Lebon collection Monday reading, March 01, 2021 Reporter Ms. Myriam Benlolo Carabot Public reporter Mr. Alexandre Lallet Lawyer (s) SCP

consideration of the following BACKGROUND FIRST: On 07/08/2018, a claim made by Ms. A.A.A. was entered into the Spanish Data Protection Agency (AEPD), sent by

Spanish Data Protection Agency and in based on the following: FACTS FIRST: Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter, the claiming party) dated March 7, 2022 filed a claim

com , (hereinafter, “theclaimed entity ”), by virtue of a complaint filed by Ms. AAA , (hereinafter,“The claimant”), and based on the following:ACTSFIRST:

properly and timely involved in the context of the complaint. A consultation via MS Teams of which no report is submitted is insufficient for proper and timely

Alexandre LINDEN, chairman, Mr Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, vice-chairman, Ms Anne DEBET, Ms Christine MAUGÜÉ, Mr Alain DRU and Mr Bertrand du MARAIS, members;

Spanish Data Protection Agency and based to the following: BACKGROUND FIRST: Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter, the complaining party) dated April 24, 2022 filed a

data requested by her. Ms Dennerlein submits that in failing to compare the data provided by Barclays to the request made by Ms Dennerlein, the Information

following the receipt of a complaint proposed on behalf of Ms XX by her son XX. The complaint stated that Ms XX, aged 85, was contacted, in the first days of December

from the copious medical documentation that the interested party had sent to Ms Brambilla on the occasion of the osteopathic treatments she had undergone

conversations and e-mail correspondence. On the basis of the CJEU case-law in Y vs MS and the Supreme Court, it cannot be said that such data can be regarded as

state that they have found an error in the database. contract data, where Ms. A.A.A., had been assigned as a con- tact in your rental contract, number

Spanish Data Protection Agency and based to the following BACKGROUND FIRST: Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter, the complaining party) dated June 8, 2022 filed a claim

File:EDPB 2 Plenary.pdf [10:00 – 10:45] The minutes were amended as set out in the FINAL version and adopted unanimously with the amendments sent by the

commerce (LSSI), and based on the following,BACKGROUNDFIRST: dated 02/25/19, Ms. AAA (hereinafter, “the claimant”), presented this-crito before the Spanish

to the following: BACKGROUND FIRST: D. A.A.A. in the name and on behalf of Ms. B.B.B. (hereinafter, the claimant) on August 5, 2019 filed a claim with the

causal link The applicant’s marriage to Ms D was converted into a registered partnership, after which the applicant and Ms D entered into a covenant for the

specializing in issuing credit ratings, violated Ms. B.'s right to information under the GDPR when C. Ges.m.b.H. Ms. B. has not provided any meaningful information

extending the state of health emergency; After hearing Ms Marie-Laure DENIS, Chairwoman, in her report, and Ms Nacima BELKACEM, Government Commissioner, in her

RoP. The Chair of the Board informed the members about the intervention of Ms. Jourová around 3 o’clock. Observers were present during the plenary meeting

Department. With a note dated 12.19.2021, the lawyer Ivan Trubbas, on behalf of Ms Isidahomhen Joy, owner of the individual company Naija Market International

information it requested in the course of an investigation following a complaint by Ms AAA. With the above-mentioned conduct of the respondent, the power of investigation

2023; Considering the file and its supplements; After hearing the report from Ms. Valérie PEUGEOT, commissioner, and the observations of Mr. Damien MILIC,

2022. Where were present - Mr. F. FOGLI, Acting Counsellor. president, - Ms A.-M. WITTERS, Advisor - Mr. 0. DUGARDYN, Counselor C. JOURDAN, Registrar

Also, the complainant states that, as appears from the under no. ... Order of Ms. Prosecutor Plemmeleiodiki..., which her relative attaches to the complaint

Agency for Data Protection and based on to the following BACKGROUND FIRST: Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter, "the complaining party") dated October 19 of 2021 filed

At this point in time, Ms. T., as an IT employee, was authorized to access the so-called special cases. The plaintiff asked Ms. T. to see if he had an

April 13, 2023; Considering the file and its supplements; On the proposal of Ms. Valérie PEUGEOT, commissioner, and after hearing the observations of Mr.

FIRST: PROCEED TO FILE these proceedings. SECOND: NOTIFY this resolution to Ms. A.A.A. In accordance with the provisions of article 50 of the LOPDGDD, this

Spanish Agency for Data Protection andbased on the following:BACKGROUNDFIRST: Ms. AAA (hereinafter, the claimant) dated April 9,2019 filed a complaint with

provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679"; HAVING REGARD to the complaint lodged by Ms XX, through her lawyer, with this Authority against Bank Rewire EU B.V.; HAVING

at) , transmitted with the following content: "To the department *** Since Ms. Susanne F *** works as a kindergarten teacher for you and said on the TV

of the LOPDGDD. SECOND: APPOINT D. B.B.B. as instructor. and, as secretary, Ms. C.C.C., indicating that any of them may be challenged, where appropriate

Spanish Agency for the Protection ofData and based on the following:ACTSFIRST: Ms. AAA (hereinafter, the claimant) dated October 18, 2019filed a claim with

service (SICER), gave as a result: delivery on 02/24/20, the recipient being: Ms. B.B.B. - *** NIF.1 THIRD: On 06/15/20, when the website *** URL.1 was consulted

83.5.a) of the aforementioned RGPD. To appoint Mr. B.B.B. as instructor and Ms. C.C.C. as secretary, indicating that either of them may be challenged, if

services, which took place on February 26, 2019. The claim filed by D. A.A.A. and Ms. B.B.B. (hereinafter the claimants). The claim is directed against XFERA MÓVILES

that was reliably notified in date 11/10/21, being the recipient of this, Ms. BBB ***NIF.1 In said notification, he was reminded of his obligation to interact

infraction "...." Considering the complaint filed by (data of the claimant Ms. A.A.A.) by letter dated X/XX/2016 by the which is brought to the attention

improving their usage of the new waste management system. The complainant, Ms AAA, filed a complaint with the AEPD claiming that the actions of the MCP

provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679"; CONSIDERING the complaint presented by Ms XX and Mr. XX on 09/10/2021, pursuant to art. 77 of the Regulation, with which

section, presiding; Mr. Bertrand Dacosta, Ms. Anne Egerszegi, presidents of chambers; Mr Olivier Yeznikian, Ms Rozen Noguellou, Mr Nicolas Polge, Mr Vincent

Spanish Data Protection Agency and based on the following FIRST CURRENTS: Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter, the claimant) on March 12, 2019 filed a complaint with

FIRST: On 16/05/19, the following complaint was filed with this Agency by Ms. A.A.A., (hereinafter, "the complainant"), in which she indicated, among others

which ended withthe following pronouncement:"APPRECIATE ( *** REFERENCE.1 ) to Ms. AAA and D. BBB as responsibleof the video surveillance system installed in

discussion of the case on 23-4-2021. The meeting of 23-4-2021 was attended by Ms. Ioanna Kamarinopoulou, lawyer (AMDSA…), as a representative of the responsible

physically abused Ms. T. Furthermore, it has been made credible that the applicant has still not been convicted in Spain of the alleged attack on Ms T. Irrespective

Agency for the Protection ofData..THIRD: APPOINT Mr. BBB as instructor and Ms. BBB as secretary . CCC ,indicating that any of them may be challenged, if

benoude-esitamine from registration number 4-1/19/192. /signed digitally/ Ms Elve Adamson Inspector General under the authority of the Director-General

of the LOPDGDD. SECOND: APPOINT D. R.R.R. as instructor. and, as secretary, Ms. S.S.S., indicating that any of them may be challenged, if applicable, in

sedeagpd.gob.es 9/12 SECOND: APPOINT D. R.R.R. as instructor. and as secretary to Ms. S.S.S., indicating that any of them may be challenged, if applicable, in

article 83.5.a) of the aforementioned RGPD.2. APPOINT Mr. RRR as instructor and Ms. SSS as secretary ,indicating that any of them may be challenged, where appropriate

83.5.a) of the aforementioned RGPD. To appoint Mr. B.B.B. as instructor and Ms. C.C.C. as secretary, indicating that either of them may be challenged, if

He believes that these processing delays are recurrent. As an illustration, Ms. [...]'s request for deletion and objection was received on July 4, 2018.

Asociativa de Valencia UNAE, with NIF G46421673, in the name and representation of Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter, the claimant) dated February 18, 2020 filed a claim

03.07.2017 as legal representation of Ms XXXX and would like to comment as follows: … You are asking us to delete Ms XXXX's profile along with all reviews

Alexandre LINDEN, President, Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, Vice-President, and Ms Sylvie LEMMET and Christine MAUGÜE, members; Considering the Convention n

was no such consent with regard to the other three MPs. Mr. N.D. claims that Ms. M.C. stated on air that she had access to "this type of health personal data

section, presiding; Mr. Bertrand Dacosta, Ms. Anne Egerszegi, presidents of chambers; Mr. Olivier Yeznikian, Ms. Rozen Noguellou, Mr. Nicolas Polge, Mr.

in accordance with Section 167 SGB IX ("BEM"). The plaintiff then proposed Ms. X, a representative of the works council, a representative of the disabled

provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679"; GIVEN the complaint presented by Ms XX on 06/07/2020 pursuant to art. 77 of the Regulation, with which Intesa

that by an appeal pursuant to Article 702 bis of the Code of Civil Procedure, Ms SEMSE complained of the failure to holder Comet s.p.a.'s failure to reply

pupils were made visible to an unnecessarily wide group of people through MS Office 365 e-mail address book. A guardian complained to the DPA about the

Policy. APPOINTMENT: as Instructor, Mr. B.B.B., and Secretary, if applicable, Ms. C.C.C., indicating that any of them may be challenged, if applicable, pursuant

in based on the following: FACTS FIRST: D. A.A.A. (hereinafter claimant 1), Ms. B.B.B. (hereafter claimant 2) and D. C.C.C. (hereinafter claimant 3) dated

RGPD. SECOND: APPOINT D. *** INSTRUCTOR 1 as instructor and as secretary to Ms. *** SECRETARY. 2, indicating that any of them may be challenged, where appropriate

2016/679"), following an administrative procedure initiated ex officio to impose on Ms A. T. conducting business activity under the name of [...] in administrative

Agency for the Protection of Data and based on the following: ACTS FIRST: Ms. AAA (hereinafter, the claimant) dated February 25, 2019 filed a claim with

Spanish Agency for Data Protection andbased on the following:BACKGROUNDFIRST: Ms. AAA (hereinafter, the claimant) dated February 25, 2019filed a claim with

aforementioned RGPD. SECOND: APPOINT D. B.B.B. as an instructor. and as secretary to Ms. C.C.C., indicating that any of them may be challenged, if applicable, in

complaint. By complaint of XX, lodged pursuant to Article 77 of the Rules, Ms XX, an employee of the Municipality of Manduria, complained about the communication

in accordance with sections 1626 (1), 1629 (1) sentence 1 and sentence 2 ms. 1 BGB as its legal representative. 13 To the extent permitted, the applications

with which he declared that: - “the company I-Model s.r.l., in the person of Ms. XX, has not had the opportunity to verify the effective sending of the requests/requests

Guillaume Goulard, Presidents of Chambers; Ms Natalie Escaut, Ms Anne Egerszegi, Mr Thomas Andrieu, Councillors of State, Ms Christelle Thomas, Maître des requêtes

Company effectively allowed Ms. XX to access information relating to the health services provided to the complainant (colleague of Ms. XX) to which she would

processing fall's under the GDPR's household exemption. Mr X and Ms Y have a son and are divorced. Ms Y has sole custody of their son. Reliable care is required

period from September 27th, 2022 to October 3rd, 2022 by using health data from Ms. Karina U*** in response to a W***net review. have published. This is without

in the file; Made the following decision regarding: The complainants: Ms. X1, and Ms. X2 hereinafter “the complainants”; . . . The defendant: Y, hereinafter:

Weicheldinger, master of requests for extraordinary service, - the conclusions of Ms. Esther de Moustier, public rapporteur; Considering the following: 1. It appears

section, presiding; Mr. Bertrand Dacosta, Ms. Anne Egerszegi, presidents of chambers; Mr. Olivier Yeznikian, Ms. Rozen Noguellou, Mr. Nicolas Polge, Mr.

Alexandre LINDEN, president, Mr. Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, vice-president, Ms. Christine MAUGÜÉ and MM. Alain DRU and Bertrand du MARAIS, members; Having

(available on the website of the Ministry of Justice with the address: ekrs.ms.gov.pl), it was established that in the aforementioned period, the Company's

Policy.NAME: as Instructor to D. BBB , and Secretary, where appropriate, to Ms. CCC ,indicating that any of them may be challenged, if applicable, in accordance

Spanish Agency for Data Protection andbased on the followingBACKGROUNDFIRST: Ms. AAA (hereinafter, the claimant) filed on 11/14/2019claim before the Spanish

Spanish Agency for Data Protection and based on the following ACTS FIRST: Ms. AAA (* hereinafter, the claimant) dated January 23, 2020filed a claim with

APPOINT: as Instructor to D. R.R.R., and Secretary, where appropriate, to Ms. indicating that any of them may be challenged, if applicable, in accordance

Application .......... Anna Christou (Ms) for Ioannidis Dimitriou D.E.P.E., for the applicants. Irini Neofytou (Ms) for Attorney General, for the defendant

2016/679"; CONSIDERING the complaint presented on 15 November 2021 with which Ms XX complained of an alleged violation of the Regulations by the Fondazione

35), having conducted administrative proceedings concerning the complaint of Ms K. I., of irregularities in the processing of her personal data consisting

Alexandre LINDEN, president, Mr. Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, vice-president, Ms. Isabelle LATOURNARIE-WILLEMS and MM. Alain DRU and Bertrand du MARAIS, members;

75) . By the defendant fulfilling the requirements of Art. 15 para. 1 ms. 1, ms. 2 lit. a, b in conjunction Art. 12 Para. 1, 3 E. has violated the plaintiff's

withdrawn by the same on XX"; - "please note that due to a mere material error, Ms. (...), on date XX, sent to Mr.'s email (...), instead of the confirmation

was granted, setting a new date for the discussion of the case on 23-4-2021. Ms Ioanna Kamarinopoulou, lawyer (DPA ...), representing the controller, attended

the terms of his report, the Inspector General finds in this regard next : "Ms. X's right of access (read the complainant) to data concerning her processed

PABLO ARAMENDI SANCHEZ ILMOS/AS. MR./MRS. MAGISTRATES: D. RAMÓN GALLO LLANOS Ms. ANA SANCHO ARANZASTI In MADRID, on June twenty-seventh, two thousand and

attending. The meeting was also attended by an order from the President of Ms Alikaakou and Mr E. Skouglos, Assistant Rapporteurs, who, having provided

Policy. NAME: as Instructor to DRRR, and Secretary, where appropriate, to Ms SSS , indi- Whereas any of them may be challenged, if applicable, in accordance

Agency for Data Protection and based on to the following BACKGROUND FIRST: Ms. A.A.A., in the name and representation of D. B.B.B., D. C.C.C., D. D.D.D

APPOINT: as Instructor to D. R.R.R., and Secretary, where appropriate, to Ms. S.S.S., indi- Whereas any of them may be challenged, as the case may be,

burden of proof with regard to a data subject (other than the complainant), Ms Z, in order to support his to prove wrong via Facebook. Without the consent

the attorney Maríadel Carmen Ortiz Cornago and under the legal direction of Ms. María Paz Martín Álvarez, against the sentencedictated by the First Section

Aladjidi, Presidents of Chambers; Ms. J... C..., Ms. A... K..., MI.. B..., MD.. E..., Mr. Arno Klarsfeld, State Councilors and Ms. Christelle Thomas, master of

Alexandre LINDEN, president, Mr. Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, vice-president, Ms. Isabelle LATOURNARIE-WILLEMS and MM. Alain DRU and Bertrand du MARAIS, members;

interested party) , has involuntarily registered the vaccination in the name of Ms (…) and not of the same name who had actually received the administration

claim are the following: On November 25, 2020, in his capacity as attorney for Ms. B.B.B., on its behalf, it submitted a statement of claim to the BBVA entity

other persons, as can be assumed, also former employees of the Bank (Ms B. and Ms C.), who also had unauthorized access to the platform, did not log into

rights of Ms. Turner, who appealed against this ruling. The German Supreme Court held that a claim for injunctive relief with regard to the use of Ms. Turner's

the other, the Inspector, Head of Section Technique responsible for, (...). Ms. (...) stated that in order to take advantage of "recycled paper, since it

Alexandre LINDEN, President, Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, Vice-President, and Ms Anne DEBET and Christine MAUGÜE, members; Considering the Convention n o 108

been requested by the claimant, as the new owner, and its hitherto owner, Ms. B.B.B. Likewise, there is evidence that, as a consequence of such action

Spanish Agency for Data Protection andbased on the followingBACKGROUNDFIRST: Ms. AAA (hereinafter, the claimant) filed on 04/04/2019claim before the Spanish

Specifically, the complainant has informed the company that there is a ... Order of Ms. Prosecutor Plemmeleiodiki ..., by which it was judged that he has nothing

data of the complainant was provided to EDP,by telephone, on 05/17/2018, by Ms. BBB who made thechange in the ownership of the gas contract and stated that

” 37. The sole affidavit sworn on behalf of the notice party was sworn by Ms. Pat Pierce, its Data Protection Officer, who says that sanctions were imposed

president, Mr. Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, vice-president, Ms. Anne DEBET, Mr. Bertrand du MARAIS and Ms. Christine MAUGÜE, members; Having regard to Regulation

Started: 18.07.2023 Decided: 30.11.2023 Published: 01.12.2023 Fine: n/a Parties: Ms. X, represented by noyb - European Center for Digital Rights RADIO TÉLÉVISION

advertising". Since 01.08.2006, the managing director under trade law has been Ms XXXX . 1.2 In carrying out this business, it operates a data application "DAM

Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es, 14/18 HE REMEMBERS: START: PUNISHMENT PROCEDURE against Ms. A.A.A. with NIF.: ***NIF.1, holder of the website: https://liasclothes.olistshops

disclosure Page 44 private phone number and social security number to Mr. XXXX and Ms. XXXX has been demonstrably transmitted by the job market service XXXX), -

January 26, 2023 by using the contact details (name and telephone number) of Ms. Melanie O***, Mr. Ernst P** * and five other people who are only known to

it is a day in which the Doctor who performed the analysis does not work. Ms C. has never contacted the ASST, either to collect her result (which remained

all documentation following her return to work; • all correspondence between Ms [the complainant]'s lawyers and [the school]; • evaluation interviews.” 19

the company and the investigation activity. 1.1 By complaint of 24 July 2018 Ms XX (represented and defended by lawyer XX) asked the Authority to order the

oral procedure at first instance of 9 September 2019; * - the pleading of Ms Zomer and Zomer presented and proposed at the appeal hearing; * - the written

complaint dated 25 February 2019, then spontaneously regularized on 17 April 2019, Ms. XX complained about alleged violations of the Regulation by Reweb s.r.l.

long time, with the employment relationship continuing in the background. Ms D, who was named as a witness, was unknown to the plaintiff. The plaintiff

didn't mean to continue writing, but to pass on. Ms. "XXXX" asked me whether this XXXX was my ex-girlfriend (Ms. XXXX and XXXX are apparently the same person

APPOINT: as Instructor to D. B.B.B., and Secretary, where appropriate, to Ms. C.C.C., indicated Whereas any of them may be challenged, as the case may

National Register and the BCSS both contain the same information relating to Ms. X's address [read complainant], the relevant question before the DPA is not

13/02/2019 he joined the Spanish Protection Agency of Data (AEPD) a claim from Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter, the claimant) against GLOBAL BUSINESS TRAVEL SPAIN,

APPOINT: as Instructor to D. R.R.R., and Secretary, where appropriate, to Ms. S.S.S., indicating that any of them may be challenged, if applicable, in

Following the murder of a Slovak journalist and his fiancée, Mr Ján Kuciak and Ms Martina Kušnírová, in Slovakia on 21 February 2018, the Slovak authorities

Alexandre LINDEN, president, Mr. Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, vice-president, Ms. Anne DEBET and Christine MAUGÜÉ, and MM. Alain DRU and Bertrand du MARAIS

of examining these elements; Having regard to the additional request from Ms. Valérie PEUGEOT, commissioner rapporteur, notified to the boards of the companies

on, since the forwarding to Mr. [...] was unintentional and the employee, Ms. [...], thought she was sending the message to the plaintiff, which would

policy". APPOINT: Mr. B.B.B. as Instructor, and Secretary, if applicable, Ms. C.C.C., indicating that any of them may be challenged, as the case may be

National Commission for Data Protection sitting in a restricted body composed of Ms Tine A. Larsen, president, and Messrs Thierry Lallemang and Marc Lemmer, commissioners;

health code, in particular its article L. 1461-3; After hearing the report from Ms. Valérie PEUGEOT, commissioner, and the observations of Mr. Damien MILIC,

Integral" in which he appears as policyholder and includes as only insured to Ms. B.B.B., contracting made in the offices of IBERCAJA, in its capacity as the

Protection Agency and in based on the following: BACKGROUND FIRST: On 08/10/22, Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter, the complaining party) filed claim before the Spanish

APPOINT: as Instructor to D. R.R.R., and Secretary, where appropriate, to Ms. S.S.S., indicating that any of them may be challenged, if applicable, in

your ownership.APPOINT: DBBB as Instructor , and Secretary, if applicable, Ms. CCC , indicatingWhereas any of them may be challenged, if applicable, in

information and the alleged violation of the right to information as well as against Ms. Sofia C*** (second respondent), represented by the first respondent, because

aforementioned and mere clerical error, n. 2 copies of the same medical record of Ms (omissis) and inserted in two separate packages: one destined correctly for

Spanish Data Protection Agency and based to the following BACKGROUND FIRST: Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter the claimant) on 12/28/2021 filed claim before the Spanish

[CONFIDENTIAL] Contact [CONFIDENTIAL] Subject Decision to impose a fine Dear Ms.Kaag, The Data Protection Authority (hereinafter: AP) has decided to ask the

provisions of art. 83 of the said regulation. APPOINT: Mr. A.A.A. as Instructor and Ms. B.B.B. as Secretary, indicating that any of them may be challenged, if appropriate

"significant effects on the rights and obligations of the data subject, i.e. Ms A. W.". Due to the assumption that this breach is unlikely to result in a

summon the employees of the defendant tax office (Ms. E..., Ms. F..., Mr. G..., Ms. H..., Ms. I..., Ms. J..., head of the tax office Mr. K...) to the meeting

the time working in the solvent department of the XX health facility, where Ms. XX was hospitalized. Following the publication of the article, the complainant

Alexandre LINDEN, chairman, Mr Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, vice-chairman, Ms Anne DEBET, Ms Christine MAUGÜÉ and Mr Alain DRU, members; Having regard to Regulation

(hereinafter the "CNPD" or the "National Commission") received a complaint from Ms [...] (hereinafter the "Claimant") concerning the publication of her [data]

footer of “unsubscribe”. COOLTRA acknowledges that a mistake was made, because Ms. A.A.A. states that, finally, he sent email correctly to rgpd@ecooltra.com

following, among other things: The letter that you sent does not matter to Ms. [remark of interlocutory judge: [defendant] ]. This is evidenced by the fact

representatives of Google LLC. : As counsel for the company Google LLC. ; […] Ms. Eve JULLIEN, Government Commissioner, who made no comment; The company having

falsifiers is liable pursuant to art. 168 of the Code, it is ascertained that Ms. XX processed personal data that did not comply with the relevant regulations

Mentioned at the tables of the Lebon collection 10th - 9th chambers combined Ms Christelle Thomas, rapporteur Mr. Laurent Domingo, public reporter SCP MARLANGE

original for more details. DECISION N° 433069 THE QUADRATURE OF THE NET CALIOPEN Ms. Christelle Thomas Rapporteur Mr. Alexandre Lallet Public Rapporteur Session

LINDEN, President, Mr. Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, Vice-President, Ms. Anne DEBET, Ms. Christine MAUGÜÉ, Mr. Bertrand du MARAIS and Mr. Alain DRU , members ;

complaint presented to this Authority on 12/19/2020, regularized on 11/10/2021, Ms. XX represented that she had formulated a request to exercise her rights,

hospitals French for the interoperability and free sharing of algorithms, Ms. B ... I ..., MC .. A ..., the national union of journalists (SNJ), the general

notification received (fasc. n. 169175). With a report dated 28 July 2021, Ms XX complained that, after an altercation with a Rinascente store employee

Alexandre LINDEN, President, Philippe-Pierre CABOURDIN, Vice-President, and Ms Anne DEBET and Christine MAUGÜE, members; Having regard to Convention 108

meeting in its restricted formation composed of Mr Alexandre LINDEN, chairman, Ms Christine MAUGÜÉ, Mr Alain DRU and Mr Bertrand du MARAIS, members; Having

same is, Mrs. Mercedes with DNI NUM002 and the tenants are, Mr. Ignacio and Ms. Noemi. It is also observed that, in the twentieth point of the contract,

Commission for Data Protection sitting in restricted formation composed of Ms. Tine A. Larsen, president, and Messrs. Thierry Lallemang and Marc Lemmer

invited the EDPB members to inform the EU COM about any screening made in MS about the respect of data protection in the context of the elections. The

aforementioned RGPD. 2. APPOINT Mr. R.R.R. as instructor. and as secretary to Ms. S.S.S., indicating that any of them may be challenged, if applicable, in

regarding the violation of the provisions on the protection of personal data by Ms. K.W. running a business under the name W. with its place of business in O

documents in the file; has adopted the following decision on: The complainant: Ms X, hereinafter "the complainant"; The defendant: Y, hereinafter "the defendant"

transactions at G1. were fully booked at the time the insolvency was opened: Ms. ... was not at G1 at that time, according to her own statements. (but an

date and time before/after uninstallation). THIRD: NOTIFY this resolution to Ms. B.B.B.. FOURTH: Warn the sanctioned person that he must make the sanction

Commission for Data Protection sitting in restricted formation composed of Ms. Tine A. Larsen, President, and Messrs. Marc Lemmer and Alain Herrmann, commissioners;

regard to the deontological and professional errors that were made committed by Ms. Z is a complaint pending with the competent authority and the Dispute Chamber

Commission for Data Protection sitting in restricted formation composed of Ms Tine A. Larsen, President, and Messrs Thierry Lallemang and Marc Lemmer, Commissioners

the 1980s a sign was signed at Moret Ernst & Young in Rotterdam and whether Ms [defendant 1] ([defendant 2].) can claim compensation (for disadvantage) on

Agency for Data Protection and based on to the following BACKGROUND FIRST: Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter, the complaining party) dated 05/07/2021 filed a claim

documents in the file; Made the following decision regarding: The plaintiff: Ms. X, hereinafter “the plaintiff”; . . . The defendant: Mrs. Y1, hereinafter:

aforementioned RGPD. SECOND: APPOINT D. B.B.B. as instructor. and as secretary to Ms. C.C.C., indicating that any of them may be challenged, where appropriate

submitted pursuant to art. 77 of the Regulation, regularized on June 14, 2021, Ms XX complained that Educationest s.r.l. (hereinafter, the company) would have

activity. With the complaint presented to this Authority on 31 July 2023, Ms. XX complained that she had not obtained adequate feedback from Banca Popolare

aforementioned RGPD. 2. APPOINT D. B.B.B. as instructor. and as secretary to Ms. C.C.C., indicating that any of them may be challenged, where appropriate

National Commission for Data Protection sitting in a restricted body composed of Ms Tine A. Larsen, president, and Messrs Thierry Lallemang and Marc Lemmer, commissioners;

Guarantor, pursuant to art. 77 of the Regulation, dated 30 March 2022 with which Ms XX, represented and defended by the lawyer XX, complained about the violation

indicated in lett. A) of the Dispute, he represented that: “With reference to Ms XX, the related personal data are still present in Benetton's systems, despite

January 2023, presented to this Authority pursuant to art. 77 of the Regulation, Ms. XX complained about receiving, "over the years", and most recently on 1 December

Guarantor, pursuant to art. 144 of the Code, dated 9 July 2021, with which Ms XX, through her lawyer, complained of the violation of legal provisions in

documents in the file; Made the following decision regarding: The complainant: Ms. X, hereinafter “the complainant”; . . . The defendant: the rest home Y, hereinafter:

whatever quality in this case the latter did not prove to possess in relation to Ms. A.D., to submit a notification to the National Revenue Agency under Art.

Mentioned in the tables of the Lebon collection 2nd - 7th bedrooms combined Ms Stéphanie Vera, Rapporteur Mrs Sophie Roussel, public rapporteur SCP SPINOSI

25 September 2023       Before Tribunal Judge Simon Heald Tribunal Member Ms E Yates Tribunal Member Mr D Sivers         Between   PETER WAILES   Appellant

not give his consent for his personal data to be passed on. He assumes that Ms. S.'s promise of December 2, 2014 not to publish his personal data in connection