Search results

meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. 2. Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply. 3. Where reference

the NAIH's employees. Based on constitutional provision, the Act CXII of 2011 on the right to informational self-determination and on the freedom of information

‘Advice paper on special categories of data (“sensitive data”)’, 20 April 2011, p. 6 (available here). Walker, in Kühling, Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article

'consent' under the GDPR. WP29, ‘Opinion 15/2011 on the definition of consent’, 01197/11/EN WP187, 13 July 2011 (available here); and EDPB, ‘Guidelines 05/2020

Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. In that context, the Commission should consider specific measures for micro

GDPR); the Directive on Patients' Rights in Cross-Border Healthcare (Directive 2011/24/EU), regarding personal data processed within healthcare services and

2015 Ετήσια έκθεση 2014 Ετήσια έκθεση 2013 Ετήσια έκθεση 2012 Ετήσια έκθεση 2011 Ετήσια έκθεση 2010 Ετήσια έκθεση 2009 Ετήσια έκθεση 2008 Ετήσια έκθεση 2007

declaration in EU law (such as 14 days for online purchases under Directive 2011/83/EU), the right to withdraw consent has no limit. This makes long-term

Edition), citing 'Cavoukian Privacy by Design - The 7 Foundational Principles', 2011, p. 1 (available here). See also, AEPD, Guía de Privacidad desde el Diseño

of religion in general. For instance, under Article 10(1)(b) of Directive 2011/95/EU, “[t]he concept of religion shall in particular include the holding

Karimnia v. Turkey, 2009, §§ 114-115; M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], 2011, §§ 301-304 and 319; Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy [GC], 2012, § 204 CJEU

ECLI:EU:C:2016:572, paragraphs 137-154 or in case C-70/10, Scarlet Extended, ECLI:EU:C:2011:255, margin number 99.” EDPB, ‘Guidelines 10/2020 on restrictions under Article

relevant findings to the Committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council as established under this Regulation

2020). In CJEU, Case C-468/10 and C-469/10, ASNEFF and FECEMD, 24 November 2011, margin number 38 (available here) , the CJEU named two elements for a test

2016/680) The Data Protection Acts 1988 and 2003 The 2011 “ePrivacy Regulations” (S.I. No. 336 of 2011 – the European Communities (Electronic Communications

for, or the provision of, health care services as referred to in Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (9) to that natural person;

fill this section! In Hungary the GDPR is implemented by the Act CXII of 2011. You can help us fill this section! You can help us fill this section! You

users of mobile phone equipment and services and other provisions; 4) L. 3917/2011 on the retention of data that is produced or processed based on the provision

conjunction with Article 58(2) GDPR. According to Article 6 of National Law 3917/2011, records, such as the ones in question, are to be kept for a period of 12

concerning the sound recording and the cameras' field of view. Back as far as 2011, the Greek DPA issued a national directive for the CCTV at workplaces, and

processing via means of video surveillance, especially under HDPA Order 1/2011 on the use of video surveillance systems for the purposes of the protection

GDPR personal data is involved. Second, as the data subject was sentenced in 2011 and had served their prison time by 2016, the search results relate to old

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lg. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

by way of a step action regarding all contribution increases in the years 2011 - 2016, finding that all contribution increases are ineffective are and payment

DE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-subchapVI- sec1881.htm and https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-

this could not be inferred from the wording of the provision. The Directive 2011/24/EU also speaks against such a surrender of entire documents: its Article

immediately received a copy of the inspection report (document B.11). On 27 July 2011, the appellant submitted her defences (documents C.1 and C.2). On 17 September

sentence in full and that the arrest warrant had ceased to be valid since April 2011. Consequently, the information was no longer necessary for the purposes for

18, 2002 - VII ZR 260/01, NJW 2002, 2952, 2953 and from 29.03.2011 - VI ZR 117/10, NJW 2011, 1815 para. 8 each with further reference; OLG Köln, VersR 2020

the supplements to the insurance policy and the supplements from the years 2011 to 2020. Despite careful research, it was not possible to determine where

Authorization No. 2600/2011, which refers precisely to the General Population and Housing Census operation. 298. Authorization No. 2600/2011 was never subject

Inspection Service to Recommendation 1Recommendation of initiative n° 03/2011 of 25 May 2011 on the copying of identity cards as well as their use and electronic

as the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree 1 September 2011, n. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

No 1049/2001 Decided: 23.11.2011 Parties: Case Number/Name: T-82/09. Dennekamp I European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2011:688 Reference from: Language:

2001/29 Directive 2004/48 Directive 95/46 Directive 2002/58 Decided: 24.11.2011 Parties: Scarlet Extended SA Société belge des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs

free movement of such data, PbEG 1995, L 281/31. 4 HR 9 September 2011, ECLI:NL:HR:2011:BQ8097 (Santander), para. 3.3. 5 Parliamentary Papers II 2017/18

DE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-subchapVI- sec1881.htm and https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-

the articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree lg. 1 September 2011, no. 150, opposition to this provision may be lodged with the ordinary judicial

DE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-subchapVI- sec1881.htm and https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2011-title50/html/USCODE-2011-title50-chap36-

2016/679 (hereafter GDPR) and the way in which the Authority’s Directive 1/2011 on video surveillance systems should be interpreted in the light of the Regulation

Also, the CCTV system in question falls under the provisions of HDPA's 1/2011 directive, which is the main point of reference for the use of CCTV video-surveillance

usuarios@madrileña.es , to request the gas consumption made in the house during the years 2011 and 2012. The claimed entity, considering that the applicant of such information

the years 2011 to 2016 based on the respective tariffs. On the other hand, the 14th Justifications and supplementary sheets for the years 2011 to 2016.

3471/2006). However, with the provisions of article 16 par. 1 and 2 of law 3917/2011, par. 1 and 2 of article 11 of law 3471/2006 were amended, so that with article

obligation. Because the Courts and the Legal Register Centre made errors between 2011 and 2017, this information, turned out to be inaccurate and transferred without

obligation. Because the Courts and the Legal Register Centre made errors between 2011 and 2017, this information, turned out to be inaccurate and transferred without

has said that the wanted notice in question has not been valid since April 2011. The applicant has emphasized that the online content in question specifically

by national law, Directive 01/2011 and Law 4624/2019, as well as the GDPR. According to Article 9(4) of Directive 01/2011, the transmission to third parties

Code itself and to the measures prescribed by provision no. 192 of 12 May 2011, containing "Requirements regarding the circulation of information in the

which leaves the question open; VG Berlin ruling v. May 24, 2011 - Az. 1 K 133/10, BeckRS 2011, 52814; Bay. State Office for Data Protection Supervision