Search results

decisions adopted pursuant to Article 45(3) of this Regulation and decisions adopted on the basis of Article 25(6) of Directive 95/46/EC; (b) Chapter VII on cooperation

to transfer of personal data according to Article 25 Directive 95/46. Whether the provisions of Directive 95/46 are in conflict with the general principles

binding obligation of secrecy. Recital 171: Repeal of Directive 95/46/EC and Transition Phase Directive 95/46/EC should be repealed by this Regulation. Processing

previous Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC. Some of the principles are also reflected in Article 8 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (EU Charter),

implement aspects of the GDPR and the Law Enforcement Directive. Article 3(2) of the previous Directive 95/46/EG already exempted the rather sensitive area of

previously existing definition under Article 2 (a) Directive 95/46/EC. The Directive itself derives the definition from Article 2 (a) Convention 108, according

to access (Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), erasure (Article 17 GDPR), restriction (Article 18 GDPR), notification (Article 19 GDPR) or

special categories of data established in Article 9(2)(a) GDPR, Article 9(2)(c) GDPR, Article 9(2)(g) GDPR and Article 9(2)(i) GDPR directly correlate with

Article 94 - Repeal of Directive 95/46/EC 1. Directive 95/46/EC is repealed with effect from 25 May 2018. 2. References to the repealed Directive shall

DS-GVO BDSG, Article 21 GPDR, margin number 48 (C.H. Beck 2021, 3rd Edition) citing Article 2(a) Directive 2006/114/EC and Article 13(1) Directive 2002/58/EC;

pass a national data protection act that was aligned with Directive 95/46/EC. Directive 95/46/EC allowed Member States to adapt the rules to national frameworks

decisions in Category:Article 25 GDPR The Data Protection Directive did not contain a similar provision. Although Article 17 DPD Recital 46 had a similar thrust

out in Article 6 of the directive and, secondly, with one of the criteria for making data processing legitimate listed in Article 7 of the directive [...]

establishes that Directive 95/46/EC applies to matters not covered by the provisions of the EPD. Given that Article 94 GDPR repeals Directive 95/46/EC and replaces

and device manufacturers. However, similarly to what happens under Article 25, Article 32 GDPR holds practical significance when it comes to the controller

access (Article 15 GDPR), rectification (Article 16 GDPR), deletion (Article 17 GDPR), restriction of processing (Article 18 GDPR), objection (Article 21 GDPR)

adopted pursuant to paragraph 3 of this Article and decisions adopted on the basis of Article 25(6) of Directive 95/46/EC. 5. The Commission shall, where available

(EDPB), "[t]his wording is identical to that found in Recital 19 of Directive 95/46/EC, to which reference has been made in several CJEU rulings broadening

to the well-being of natural persons. Recital 3: Directive 95/46/EC Harmonisation Goal Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

legislator or intended. Compared with the previous Directive 95/46, Article 15(3) GDPR constitutes an additional right to receive a copy of all personal data

processing (Article 35(1), last sentence GDPR). "Commission decisions adopted and authorisations by supervisory authorities based on Directive 95/46/EC remain

The roots of Article 39 GDPR can be partially retraced to the GDPR’s predecessor, the Directive 95/46/EC (DPD). In particular, Article 18 DPD mentioned

(e.g. Article 25 (1) and (2), Article 28(1), Article 32(1) GDPR, Article 89(1) GDPR). These measures can also be regarded as measures under Article 24(1)

(“EDPB”). The EDPB replaces the Article 29 Working Party (“WP29”), the former advisory body established under Directive 95/46/EC. Notably, the powers granted

proceedings under Article 79 GDPR can be brought both against a controller (as defined under Article 4(7) GDPR) and a processor (as defined under Article 4(8) GDPR)

the European Union. 2. It shall apply from 25 May 2018. There is no relevant recital for Article 99 GDPR. Article 99 GDPR sets out the dates of the Regulation's

proportionality, enshrined in EU primary law in Article 5(4) TEU and Article 52(1)(2) CFR, is also reflected in Article 83(1) GDPR. In general, a measure is proportionate

for such performance. Article 7 GDPR regulates the "conditions for consent". It specifies the definition of consent set out in Article 4(11) GDPR and, by

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union ("CFR"), as well as Directive 95/46/EC. In the event that such verification is successful, the agreement

electronic communications, which supersede the GDPR(see Article 95 GDPR); the e-Commerce Directive (Directive 2000/31/EG), especially in the context of liability

Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data established by Directive 95/46/EC. It should consist of the head of a supervisory authority of each

operations. Recital 89: Abolishment of Indiscriminate General Notification Directive 95/46/EC provided for a general obligation to notify the processing of personal

Commission, or in the case of transfers referred to in Article 46 or 47, or the second subparagraph of Article 49(1), reference to the appropriate or suitable

other binding obligation of secrecy. Article 10 GDPR is a complementary provision to the Law Enforcement Directive (LED). It aims to ensure that criminal

those answers prove to be inaccurate, within the meaning of Article 6(1)(d) of Directive 95/46, for example due to the fact that, by mistake, the examination

processing. Recital 89: Abolishment of Indiscriminate General Notification Directive 95/46/EC provided for a general obligation to notify the processing of personal

Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data established by Directive 95/46/EC. It should consist of the head of a supervisory authority of each

information society service(s)." According to Article 4(25) GDPR, which in turn refers to Article 1(1) of Directive (EU) 2015/1535, an "information society service"

right to data protection. Article 51 GDPR is closely connected to Article 4(21) (definition of SA), Article 52 (independence), Article 53 (General conditions

hybrid of regulation and directive.” Whilst it establishes an EU-wide penalty regime for violations under Article 83 GDPR, Article 84(1) GDPR dispenses with

the relevance of Article 29 GDPR were rooted in the fact that Article 28(3)(b) GDPR already seems to cover much of the scope of Article 29 GDPR. More specifically

of the notion of religion in general. For instance, under Article 10(1)(b) of Directive 2011/95/EU, “[t]he concept of religion shall in particular include

Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data established by Directive 95/46/EC. It should consist of the head of a supervisory authority of each

publish a report on their activities, provided for in Article 28(5) of the Data Protection Directive, to be part of the accountability required by the principle

policy under Article 13 should not be too long. Article 12 GDPR may be limited by Union or national Law in accordance with Article 23 GDPR. Article 12(1) GDPR

point, it is important to note that Article 13(1)(f) GDPR, Article 14(1)(f) GDPR, Article 15(1)(c) GDPR and Article 15(2) GDPR, make specific reference

point of legislative history, Article 85 GDPR is a development of Article 9 of the 95/46 directive of the European Union. Article 9 obliged Member States to

the code. Although the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC (DPD) included a provision on codes of conduct (Article 27(1) DPD), this did not include any information

Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary, Article 38 GDPR, p. 702 (Oxford University Press 2020). In addition, although Directive 95/46/EC did not require organisations

Chair of the Board. Article 75 GDPR establishes the existence of, and governs the functioning of the secretariat of the Board. Article 75 GDPR outlines the