Search results

officially consolidated text, hereinafter ZVOP-1), and 2 Article 43 of the Information Commissioner Act (Official Gazette RS, No. 113/05, hereinafter ZInfP)

required in principle (see hereunder Article 65(2) GDPR) to adopt a decision under Article 65 GDPR is reached, since Article 64 GDPR only requires a simple majority

paragraph 2 of this Article. The implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 93(2). 4. The Commission

actual processing. If the information under Articles 13 or 14 GDPR and Article 15 GDPR would be the same information, Article 15(1) GDPR would be largely

exemption is based on Article 85(2) GDPR. According to Article 26(3) of the 2018 Act, certain GDPR provisions (listed in Article 26(9)) will not apply

Regulation Article 5 paragraph 1 subparagraph a Article 7 Article 9 Data Protection Act Section 6 subsection 1 paragraph 1 Insurance Contract Act Section

of the information gathered, the DPA held that the controller had violated Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, Article 9 GDPR and Article 25(2)

that the controller had violated Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 12 GDPR, Article 13 GDPR, Article 15 GDPR and Article 25(1) GDPR. As a result, the DPA issued

data. On the basis of the information gathered, the DPA held that the controller had violated Article 5(1)(e) GDPR and Article 25(2) GDPR. As a result,

data on behalf of the data subject under Article 15 GDPR; and 3) Article 6(1)(1) of the Finnish Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki) which allows insurance

very letter of the provisions of III of Article 45 of the Act of January 6, 1978 as amended, resulting from Act no. 2018-493 of June 20, 2018 aimed at bringing

the grounds that the conduct of the Commissioner violated the right to be heard. The court referred to Article 43(1),(2) Law N. 158 (I)/1999, which is

preparatory act and only the act adopted by the third party can, where appropriate, be classified as a ‘decision’ within the meaning of Article 22(1) of that

before before the issuance of the annulled act. 3.1.2 Article 47 of the General Principles of Administrative Law Act 1999 (158(I)/1999), provides that: 4 47

that the article’s publication was in violation of Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, when read in line with Article 85 GDPR. Article 5(1)(c) outlines

verification of the information provided to the authority. Naturally, information about an individual from the police is not retained, and information obtained during

breach of article 33 of the Rules. III.On corrective measures and publicity 39. Under the terms of III of article 20 of the Data Protection Act: When the

"GDPR"), which came to the attention of the Information Commissioner ("the Commissioner"). 1.2 The Commissioner considers that Ticketmaster was the controller

basis of the information presented by the controller, the Cyprus Commissioner considered that the legal basis should be consent, under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR

the requirements set in Article 82 of the Data Protection Act is set out in Article 3, paragraph I, of the Data Protection Act which provides: without

of the information gathered, the DPA held that the controller had violated Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, Article 17(1) GDPR, Article 25(1) GDPR, Article 32(1) GDPR

2020/369 Subject matter: Information for the individual, Legal bases, Consent, Education Legal act: Opinion The Information Commissioner (hereinafter: IP) has

LA 104/19, ECLI:DE:OVGNI:2020:0722.11LA104.19.00 Article 1 (1) GG, Article 2 (1) GG, § 7aF DSG ND, § 43 VwGO Proceedings VG Osnabrück, 30 January 2019,

credit information register are widely released for various purposes. Pursuant to Section 19 of the Credit Information Act, payment default information can

(violated article: Article 25) and those in accordance with Article 83(5) of the General Data Protection Regulation ( Article violated: Article 5) to the

Regulation) Article 1, paragraph 2, Article 5, Article 6, paragraph 1, subparagraph f, Article 17(1)(a), (c) and (d), Article 17(3)(a), Article 21(1) Judgments

people to read complete information by means of a link to this information. This was a violation of Article 12. Based on Article 13(2)(a) GDPR and WP29

details. Enforcement Notice issued by the Information Commissioner concerning contraventions of Article 5(2) and Article 35 UK GDPR by the Home Office ENFORCEMENT

decision have been taken by the controlled. 43. In view of the above, the restricted panel concludes that Article 38.3 of the GDPR does not have been respected

complained, the then X AG, said the Thuringian state commissioner for data protection and freedom of information with reference to Section 4f Paragraph 2 BDSG

January 1978 relating to information technology, files and liberties (hereafter referred to as the Data Protection Act or the Act of 6 January 1978) and

not completely determined by it. This already follows from Article 1.3, Article 20.3 and Article 93.1 No. 4a of the Basic Law. According to these, the commitment

company of the information and electronic commerce (hereinafter referred to as the ISESA), as provided for in 43.1 of the said Act. Article 85 of Law 39/2015

entitled to erasure under Article 17(1)(d) GDPR, as the data processing was not lawful. In any case, the requirements of Article 6 GDPR were no longer met

provide, beyond the mere information about the data loss itself, that the information and measures mentioned in Article 33(1)(b) to Article 33(1)(d) GDPR must

on the users device. Article 82 of the French Data Protection Act The DPA explained that Article 82 of the French Data Protection Act required the provider

protection law and further orders of the State Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information of Rhineland-Palatinate - LfDI - requiring him

exclude information from your response to a SAR merely because it is difficult to access. The Act deals with the situation where supplying information in permanent

the Spanish Act transposing the e-Privacy Directive? The AEPD held that there had been an infringement of Article 22(2) of the Information Society Services

applicable law 33. The first paragraph of Article 87 of the Data Protection Act, Article I of Title III of the Act provides: this Title shall apply without

given informed valid consent to receive such calls. The Information Commissioner (“Commissioner”) was tasked with determining whether the conduct of Unite

Personal information is defined as any kind of information about an identified or identifiable natural person. Thus, there is no doubt that information about

Did the provider violate Article 82 of the Data Protection Act? The DPA explained that Article 82 of the Data Protection Act required the provider to ask

second level of information information, i.e. the information note available on the website, contains all the information required under Article 13 of the GDPR

freedoms. The commissioner therefore considers that there is an Article 6 basis for processing (in this case article 6(1)(f). Moreover, the Commissioner specifies

pursuant to Article 17(2) DPA Act. 9. Moreover, as regards the one-stop-shop mechanism, Article 56 GDPR states: "Without prejudice to Article 55, the supervisory

provided for in Article 56(1), read in conjunction with Article 56(2), read in conjunction with Article 56(3), read in conjunction with Article 56(4), read

the Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information, the Hamburg Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information as well as

requests were requests for information according to Article 15(1) GDPR. The ‘Business secrecy’ exception only applied to Article 15(4) GDPR, where a data

the Commissioner required information from AAEA with respect to the processing of X's personal data. AAEA however did not reply to the Commissioner. The