Search results

2016/679, reported to art. 14 para. (11) and art. 15 para. (1) of Law no. 102/2005, as well as pursuant to art. 12-14 of Law no. 190/2018, corroborated with art

Regulation on Data Protection, corroborated with the provisions of art. 12-14 of Law no. 190/2018 on measures for the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2016/679

in the cookies "_ga" and _"gid" on August 14, 2020, at 12:46:19.344 CET. Subsequently, on August 14, 2020, at 12:46:19.948 CET, these identification numbers

way would effective enforcement of EU law - and thus also of the GDPR - be guaranteed (Wybitul/Haß/Albrecht: NJW 2018, 113, beck-online; cf. also Korch, NJW

have applied the new law, namely the GDPR and its implementing act - the Czech Law on Data Processing 2019 - instead of the old Law on Data Protection 2000

161, web doc. no. 9461168 and 9461321, provision 11 February 2021, no. 49, web document no. 9562852, as well as provision 17 December 2020, no. 280, 281 and

by art. 14, paragraph 2, of Law no. 689/1981, as it is not applicable to the case in question. It must, in fact, be remembered that on 19/9/2018 came into

interplay between the administrative law route and the civil law route and the interfaces with constitutional law and European law, in Nunner-Krautgasser/Garber/Klauser

hereinafter referred to as GDPR), and as set out in Articles 47, 642 and 68.1 of the Organic Law 3/2018, of December 5, on the Protection of Personal Data

respondents did not fall within the limits of art. 7 of Law no. 190/2018 on measures to implement EU Regulation no. 679/2016 (which was adopted in order to regulate

November 2012 - 10 C 4.12 - BVerwGE 145, 153; OVG Bln.-Brbg. 12.07.2017 - OVG 11 B 5.16 - juris; OVG NRW, judgment of 14.07.2016 - 19 A 2/14 - FamRZ 2016, 2130;

140 File 14, attachment[CONFIDENTIAL] 14File 14, attachment[CONFIDENTIAL] 14File piece16, appendix9.1:CSO_01Sept2018_30Nov2018_Overview. 14File piece16

Protection Authority dated 12.12.2018 (Supplement ./J), Response from the Respondent to the Data Protection Authority dated 04.12.2018 (Supplement ./K), Statement

countries paying in euros and dollars. 4. On May 31, 2018, in application of the President's decision no 2018-076C, a delegation from the National Commission

and control model pursuant to Legislative Decree no. 231/2001 which, with the entry into force of law n. 179/2017, was integrated and updated with a specific

requirements in Articles 12 and 13 GDPR. Finally, the DPA stated that the information given was insufficient to comply with Articles 13 and 14 GDPR as several

b. Letters from EQUIFAX, dated 11/05/2018 (file reference number 2018/251714) and of 12/20/2018 (file number 2018/285508) in which res- ponder the claimant's

paragraph 14.35. 171 Draft Decision, paragraph 14.38. 172 Draft Decision, paragraphs 14.36, 14.38. 173 Draft Decision, paragraphs 14.39-14.42. Adopted

606NOSAObjection,p.12. 607DESAs Objection,p.12;FRSAObjection,paragraph47;ITSAObjection,pp.8-10;NLSAObjection 608agraph52;NOSAObjection,p.12. DESAs Objection,p.12;FRS

fact that Decree-Law No. 54/2019 does not even have to revoke Decree-Law No. 226/2009, just as this diploma did not revoke the Decree-Law on the 2007 Census

the RGPD came into force on 25 May 2018, implicitly repealing a good part of the rules of that national law, and Law No. 0 58/2019 of 8 August, which came

referred to in Articles 13 and 14 GDPR. The information about the rights of data subjects must also be provided accordingly articles 12 to 22 and art.

Submissions,paragraph8.14. 31WhatsAppIE'sArticle65Submissions,paragraph8.14. 319 WhatsAppIE'sArticle65Submissions,paragraph8.14. 32Article56(6)GDPR. 32SeeArticle51(2)

sanctions, enshrined in Articles 12 and 14 of the Belgian Constitution 249. The principle of formal legality, enshrined in Articles 12 and 14 of the Belgian Constitution

thereof, as amended by the Decision of the EEA Joint Committee 2 No 154/2018 of 6 July 2018 , Having regard to Article 11 and Article 22 of its Rules of Procedure

monthly. (€) Months total 342/20 01/2014 12/2017 41.92 48 0 342/20 01/2018 12/2018 32.15 12 385.80 541/20 01/2018 12/2020 15.55 36 559.80 945.60 The extension

para. 6, 14 f.; Kranz, NVwZ 2018, 864) there is already no infringement of rights through an illegal impairment of (fundamental or European) law-protected

exercise the rights granted to them in Art 12 of the guidelines (ECJ C-141/12, margin no. 59). Although this case law was issued on the data protection directive

17 of Regulation no. 1/2019. Pursuant to art. 78 of the Regulation, as well as articles 152 of the Code and 10 of Legislative Decree no. 150/2011, opposition

Protection Act 2018 (“DPA”) and Article 4(7) of the UK General Data Protection Regulation (“UK GDPR”). 2. Unless otherwise stated, references to “Articles” are to

2013 - 1 ABR 17/12 - para. 15, 18; April 25, 2001 - 5 AZR 395/99 - to II of the reasons; BGH December 21, 2011 - I ZR 190/10 - para. 12). cc) The last application

has violated Article 12 (1) and Article 14 (1) points a) and c) of the General Data Protection Regulation, as well as Article 14 ( the provisions of points

within the meaning of Art. 4 No. 15, Art. 9 (1) GDPR. Sending this health data to a third party was prohibited by law. There is no reason for exception; in

Norwegian law. The Personal 31 Data Act and the GDPR entered into force in Norway on 20 July 2018. 29 Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 154/2018 of 6 July

determined by Union law or Member State law applicable to the controller.Recital 45 specifies that: "The should also be Union law or Member State law which determines

of the Basic Law and Article 12 of the Basic Law outweighs the interests of the plaintiff from Articles 2 (1) and 1 (1) of the Basic Law. 65The freedom

(Bresich/Dopplinger/Dörnhöfer/Kunnert/Riedl, DSG (2018) Section 24 margin no. 7). A statement of Violations of the law, which no longer exist at the time of the decision

violated Articles 12(3) and 15 GDPR by failing to timely act upon two separate access requests. Second, the controller violated Articles 5(1)(e), ⁣12(3) and

in EU banking law (Art. 132 and Regulation (EC) No. 25532/98) as well as in EU antitrust law (Art. 101, 102 TFEU and Regulation (EC) No. 1/2003), has completely

effectiveness of Union law and compliance with the obligations resulting from Union law are ensured (cf. ECJ, judgments of October 3, 2013 - C-113/12 [ECLI:​EU:​C:​2013:​627]

Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999, in the version of the amendment Federal Law Gazette I No. 24/2018 (Data Protection Dere- Regulation Act 2018) as unconstitutional"

BeckRS 2019, 26477 marginal no. 14; cf. also OLG Cologne, order of 18 October 2018 - 15 W 57/18, K&R 2018, 803 = BeckRS 2018, 26063). cc. The following

Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations, from June 14, 2018 (folio 21), to November 12, 2018 (folio 36), period that the official he remained on medical

BDSG, 2019, Art. 12 marginal no. 32; Heckmann/Pasche, in: Ehmann/Selmayr, Datenschutz-Grundverordnung, 2nd ed. 2018, Art. 12 marginal no. 43; Paal/Hennemann

fully harmonized Union law, according to the latest case law of the Federal Constitutional Court, the fundamental rights of the Basic Law apply according to

protection law (LG Mainz, judgment of November 12, 2021 - 3 O 12/20, juris para. 73 - not final; Quaas, in: Wolff/Brink, BeckOK data protection law, 42nd edition

2022). 6 HR March 16, 2018, ECLI:NL:HR:2018:365, NJ 2018/423 m.nt. J. Legemaate, JIN 2018/80 m.nt P.M. Hennekens, GZR-Updates.nl 2018-0138 m.nt. H. de Jager

applies by virtue of federal law (see BSG 18.12.2018 - B 1 KR 40/17 R, juris Rn. 29 ff .; BSG 18.12.2018 - B 1 KR 31/17 juris Rn. 14 f.).which serve to clarify

case law, cf. only BGH, Judgment of December 4th, 2018 - VI ZR 128/18 -, para. 9, juris and judgment of September 18th, 2009 - V ZR 75/08 -, para. 12, juris

following provisions of the GDPR: i. Articles 5.1.a) and 5.2, as well as Article 6.1 GDPR; ii. Articles 12.1 and 12.2, Article 15.1, Article 5.2, Article