Search results

(l) give advice on the processing operations referred to in Article 36(2); (m) encourage the drawing up of codes of conduct pursuant to Article 40(1) and

section! You can help us by filling in this section! The Hamburg DPA fined H&M Hennes & Mauritz Online Shop A.B. & Co KG. in October 2020 an amount of 35

guidelines, recommendations and best practices referred to in points (e) and (f); (m) issue guidelines, recommendations and best practices in accordance with point

authority the results of verifications of the measures referred to in point (j); (m) the mechanisms for reporting to the competent supervisory authority any legal

Article 21 GDPR, margin number 8 (C.H. Beck 2021, 39th Edition). LG Frankfurt a. M., 20 December 2018, 2/5 O 151/18, (available here). Herbst, in Kühling, Buchner

2019, 1st edition) ECHR, Abdolkhani and Karimnia v. Turkey, 2009, §§ 114-115; M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], 2011, §§ 301-304 and 319; Hirsi Jamaa and

personal data. Case Law: In C-708/18 - TK v Asociaţia de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA the CJEU had to provide guidance on how to assess whether processing

audit. The ICO is the best-funded DPA in Europe with a total budget of €61m in 2019, according to a Brave study. The ICO had 680 staff in 2019, far outnumbering

6 practice. However, the European Court of Justice has in the judgment M.I.C.M. from 2021 and in the judgment Breyer struck provided that dynamic IP addresses

with far too little funding for the caseload it has. The current budget is 25M euro and 180 FTE employed. Independent analysis by KPMG concludes it requires

visiting the Website can will constitute personal data. Justices Breyer and M.I.C.M. provides support for the assessment that dynamic IP addresses i all cases

be issued, Art. 33 Para. 1 M 158/10 -, resolution of September 14, 2012 - 1 M 94/12 - and resolution of October 25, 2012 - 1 M 103/12 -, each juris). The

17 practice. However, the European Court of Justice has in the judgment M.I.C.M. from 2021 and in the judgment Breyer struck provided that dynamic IP addresses

i practice. However, the European Court of Justice has in the judgment M.I.C.M. from 2021 and in the judgment Breyer struck provided that dynamic IP addresses

lawsuits became PEIRAIOS LEASING M.A.E. Therefore, the Hellenic DPA considered the controller to be PEIRAIOS LEASING M.A.E., and considered both complaints

o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]|| function(){ (i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)

its registered office at [place of business] , defendant, attorney at law M.M.C. van Graafeiland in The Hague. The parties will hereinafter be referred

official authority was not transferred to the defendant (cf. LG Frankfurt a.M., judgment of 20 December 2018 - 2/5 O 151/18 - NZI 2019, 342). However, the

Brussels Court of Appeal on 16 September 2020 by: M. BOSMANS - President-in-Office of the Council A-M. WHITETERSRaadsheer , O. DUGARDYN Alternate Counsellor

contact the ***TELEPHONE number from 9:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. which I do not do, because I receive it at 7:04 p.m. When I arrive at my home, I try to enter

President M.V. Polak as chairman and councilors C.E. du Perron, M.J. Kroeze, H. M. Wattendorff and G. C. Makkink, and pronounced in public by Counsel H.M. Wattendorff

protection violations in H&M's service centre 01.10.2020 - H&M In the case of the monitoring of several hundred employees of the H&M service centre in Nuremberg

Content Management & Consulting (M.I.C.M.) Limited Proximus NV Telenet BVBA Scarlet Belgium NV Case Number/Name: C-597/19 M.I.C.M. European Case Law Identifier:

tribunal has deemed the d between tta m e n to d e i d a ti p e rs o n a li d e g li a d e re n ti a l sris te m a M evalaute because validated by consent

pour attributaire M. [...]. Par un courrier électronique du 2 octobre 2019, la délégation de contrôle a notifié le contrôle en ligne à M. [...], après l’avoir

appropriate technical measures to guarantee security processing. 17. The counsel for M. [...] replies that his client had no desire to allow free access to these

protection law, in particular the data protection and state hospital law (DSG M-V, LKHG M-V). He also referred to an article he wrote about the GDPR in the magazine

OF THE NETHERLANDS, established in The Hague , defendant, attorney at law M.M.C. van Graafeiland, The Hague. The parties will hereinafter be referred to

considered proven facts PROVEN FACTS FIRST: On February 18, 2018 at 6:27 p.m. an email was sent from the address ecooltra@email.ecooltra.com to ***USER

a certain period of time has elapsed as a human rights concern (see ECHR, M. L. and W. W. v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 2018, nos. 60798/10 and 65599/10

different codes of conducts under Article 41 GDPR (redacted as "code S***", code M*** and code U***"). These codes had been approved by the DSB under Article

ECLI:NL:HR:2016:1483, NJ 2017/262 m.nt. S.D. Lindenbergh and J.S. Kortmann, Ars Aequi 2017, p. 41 ff. m.t. W.H. van Boom, JOR 2016/332 m.nt. M.M.C. of the Moosdijk and

appellant, Attorney at law: Mr. J.M. Molkenboer in Tilburg, by ING BANK N.V. , based in Amsterdam, Intimate, Attorney at law: Mr. I.M.C.A. Reinders Folmer, Amsterdam

its content. This state of affairs is confirmed by the explanations of Mrs. M. K., ZSO teacher, classroom teacher [...] (the protocol of acceptance of oral

Handels- und Betriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. and stored there. In the past, employees of XY Handels- und Betriebsgesellschaft m.b.H. had access to the image material

fine on Ms M. Z. conducting business activity under the name K., the President of the Office for Personal Data Protection establishing that Ms M. Z. conducting

appeal. Thus determined by C.H.M. van Altena, Chairman, and C.M. Wissels and C.C.W. Lange, Members, in the presence of M.H. Kuggeleijn-Jansen, Registrar

brief dated November 4th, 2020, the plaintiff brought an action before the M. District Court. This was given to the defendant on Delivered on December 10th

represented by its agents. Third Party is represented by its agents and M.J.M. Piels. Considerations Why doesn't the court grant the plaintiff's request

otto.m***@at.com If you have any questions or concerns about the processing of your personal data, please feel free to contact contact us: otto.m***@at

qualified as minor for the purposes of the statute of limitations in Article 74.m) of the LOPDGDD. FOURTH: On 16/06/2020, FUNDACION SINDROME 5P MENOS DE C.V

for the data prepared in connection with epidemiological measures, e.g. á m. data obtained by sampling for COVID-19. The data received by the epidemiologist

lawyers, - Zs. Biró-Tóth and M. Z. Fehér, representing the Hungarian government, in the capacity of attorney, - T. Machovičová, M. Smolek and J. Vláčil, representing

cloudflare.com/terms/ httos://www.cloudflare.com/resources/assets/slt31c6tev37/1 M 1 j5uuFDuLTYiZJJDPBag/bda8d591447971 b3df2bccf5aa4e0916/Customer OPA v,3 1

XXXX p.m. The complaint regarding XXXX was submitted via ERV at XXXX p.m. The complainant's complaint regarding XXXX was filed via ERV at XXXX p.m. The complaint

his family, mother L. V., father Ž. V., brother I.V. and common-law wife M.M., so he could not determine with certainty who ... at ... hours was driving

(further) prosecution is undesirable (a so-called policy dismissal). T he M arket h o w a t w a ck both respect the orm e le and the material obligation

Office for Personal Data Protection to perform his tasks, i.e. to consider Mr. M. K.'s complaint about irregularities in the processing of his personal data

Inspection Service, 6 January 2020 (Exhibit 53), pp. 99 ff. 86C. SANTOS , M. OUWENS , M. OTH, N. IELOVA, V. OCA, "Consent Management Platforms Under the GDPR:

installation and use of surveillance cameras (hereinafter the Cameras Law), M.B., May 31, 2007. 6 Decision 19/2020 regarding the consultation of the National