Search results

From GDPRhub
  • reposicion" to ask the AEPD to reconsider its decision or 2) an appeal directly with the Superior Administrative Court. Recurso: You have one month to file. The
    4 KB (386 words) - 15:29, 3 September 2021
  • fine is brought to the police who present the case in court. As such, appeals will go through the court system. Datatilsynet post the focus of their planned
    6 KB (605 words) - 14:08, 27 April 2021
  • own motion. Appeals against decisions by the Italian Garante can be taken by the parties concerned before the civil court (Article 152 of the Code, which
    7 KB (808 words) - 08:17, 16 February 2023
  • Commissioner) is the national data protection authority for Malta. → Details see IDPC (Malta) You can help us fill this section! You can help us fill this
    2 KB (132 words) - 23:46, 14 January 2020
  • section! The Court of Appeal of Brussels is competent for the appeals against the decision of the litigation chamber. All other decisions can be appealed
    9 KB (993 words) - 07:10, 28 July 2022
  • highest administrative court (Conseil d'État). This applies to sanctions, guidelines or any decision of the authority. Decisions by the Conseil d'État are
    8 KB (824 words) - 22:52, 27 February 2024
  • change parts of or their whole decision. The DPA will then send the recipient the final decision, who may now appeal the decision if they still object to the
    10 KB (1,078 words) - 06:40, 26 March 2023
  • the NAIH decision shall be submitted to the authority itself within thirty days of its communication. Only attorney at law can act at the court on behalf
    7 KB (821 words) - 14:16, 7 March 2024
  • seems to be no formal decision that can be appealed. Any party can file an appeal against any DSB decision (or in the case of non-decision within 6 months)
    11 KB (1,468 words) - 13:27, 14 May 2023
  • who prepared the opinion. Decisions in inspection procedures include information on the staff member, who issued the decision on the Information Commissioner’s
    10 KB (1,242 words) - 10:51, 6 February 2024
  • legally binding decision may appeal against the decision with in 28 days. Further appeals on a point of law to the Hight Court or Appeals Court are possible
    8 KB (1,034 words) - 14:13, 20 August 2021
  • Any third party that is affected by the Court decision and did not intervene in the proceedings nor was the decision lawfully notified to him prior to the
    23 KB (2,039 words) - 08:15, 25 April 2024
  • will have to go before a court to claim compensation. Typically, this claim will first take place before the Small Claims Court. The EWCA in Open Rights
    18 KB (2,488 words) - 15:22, 14 December 2021
  • submission to the Director of the DVI. Furthermore, the decision issued by Director may be appealed to a court in accordance with the Law on Administrative Liability
    6 KB (544 words) - 04:39, 11 October 2022
  • tribunal for review. A tribunal decision may also be challenged and the case will then move forward in the Luxembourg court system. Complaints can be filed
    10 KB (1,199 words) - 10:14, 19 October 2022
  • overturn or amend the contested decision. It is then not possible to appeal the decision by the Head of the DPA. This decision can then only be challenged
    5 KB (441 words) - 09:34, 17 September 2022
  • Appeals against decisions are possible in the German administrative jurisdiction. Court of first instance is the district administration court (Verwaltungsgericht)
    4 KB (372 words) - 10:45, 22 September 2021
  • instance court against a decision taken by the EDPS. Should the decision be appealed by the data subject, this will then go to the Court of Justice (CJEU)
    8 KB (1,078 words) - 12:58, 10 May 2024
  • is manifestly unfounded b) the subject of the complaint is reviewed by a court or law enforcement authority c) the complainant has not provided necessary
    9 KB (1,006 words) - 07:13, 7 July 2021
  • case. Fixed deadlines cannot be set to address this issue. The European Court of Justice has established that an examinee can request that their examination
    61 KB (8,488 words) - 15:47, 18 March 2024
  • independence of SAs extends to adequacy decisions adopted by the Commission. An SA is not bound by an adequacy decision adopted by the Commission under Article
    47 KB (5,594 words) - 22:45, 1 April 2024
  • national courts and the Court of Justice only the national court has the authority to interpret and apply the national legal provisions, while the Court of Justice
    49 KB (7,800 words) - 09:22, 5 January 2024
  • blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the Maltese original. Please refer to the Maltese original for more details. On
    19 KB (3,039 words) - 14:24, 21 February 2024
  • has been the subject of Maltese court cases. Case reporting is also afforded journalistic privileges under national law. The Maltese DPA saw its task as balancing
    5 KB (655 words) - 10:34, 29 November 2023
  • blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the Maltese original. Please refer to the Maltese original for more details. [doc
    35 KB (5,495 words) - 15:17, 19 March 2024
  • The Maltese DPA decided that a controller, sending personal schoolwork to a data subject's personal email adress with other people in the "cc", is an infringement
    15 KB (1,805 words) - 10:08, 13 November 2023
  • appealed and the BVwG confirmed the DSB decision in case W137 2259819-1. Share blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine translation of the
    25 KB (3,875 words) - 10:36, 11 January 2024
  • The Maltese DPA ordered a controller to rectify a record for international protection under Article 16 GDPR. In 2016 the data subject gave Maltese authorities
    29 KB (4,620 words) - 14:50, 6 December 2023
  • complaint, filed at a Maltese court, on their Facebook page. The video contained information relating to 26 data subjects. The Maltese DPA (IDPC) requested
    16 KB (2,429 words) - 14:21, 7 May 2024
  • After Datatilsynet made a decision on a case, this decision can be appealed within three weeks after receipt of the decision. The appeal has to be submitted
    5 KB (427 words) - 15:48, 24 January 2022
  • the proceedings and is not the subject of this decision. 109 VIII. Subsidiary decisions 110 1. The decision on costs is based on §§ 92 Paragraph 1, 100 ZPO
    49 KB (8,074 words) - 08:33, 6 October 2022
  • suspended if another authority or court is to issue a binding decision which is essential for the authority to issue its own decision. This could be the case, for
    52 KB (8,052 words) - 09:31, 27 November 2023
  • precisely recourse to the Market Court", Court of Appeal Brussels, Market Court section, 19 th Chamber A, Market Court section, 2019/AR/741, 12 June 2019
    429 KB (58,279 words) - 09:12, 2 November 2022
  • (redacted) decision. Once the OLG Rostock has issued its decision, it will be linked here. Share blogs or news articles here! The decision below is a machine
    103 KB (16,959 words) - 13:58, 20 September 2021